Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 145. (Read 224961 times)
October 19, 2017, 07:21:44 AM
1060 3gb how much sol?
October 19, 2017, 07:16:20 AM
I'm testing ZM v0.5.2 windows on 1080 ti rig, 2% hashrate better EWBF's miner and more efficiency than EWBF's.
But CPU usage more than 80%, in EWBF just 40 - 45%.
@dstm: you did nice job, please check CPU usage
But CPU usage more than 80%, in EWBF just 40 - 45%.
@dstm: you did nice job, please check CPU usage
What windows version are you on?
I use win 10, CPU G4400, rig: 8 x 1080ti.
October 19, 2017, 06:52:35 AM
I ordered one.
One thing for sure though is that the difficulty will be rising A LOT, so doing a profitability calculator at the moment is not that accurate when you think about the possible situation
One thing for sure though is that the difficulty will be rising A LOT, so doing a profitability calculator at the moment is not that accurate when you think about the possible situation
October 19, 2017, 06:40:03 AM
Just for reference:
This is what I'm getting on a 10GPU system (6*1070 + 4*1080Ti) running linux with an i3-7300T (a 35W CPU)
This is what I'm getting on a 10GPU system (6*1070 + 4*1080Ti) running linux with an i3-7300T (a 35W CPU)
Code:
1 [|||||||||| 18.2%] Tasks: 112, 279 thr; 2 running
2 [|||||||||| 16.6%] Load average: 0.80 0.57 0.27
3 [|||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 51.0%] Uptime: 00:53:42
4 [||||||||| 15.3%]
October 19, 2017, 06:31:42 AM
Pls state your Windows version, the CPU you're on and the running GPUs when reporting CPU load.
Windows 10, AMD A4 7300, 4GB of RAM
October 19, 2017, 06:27:59 AM
Pls state your Windows version, the CPU you're on and the running GPUs when reporting CPU load.
October 19, 2017, 06:25:46 AM
I'm still not able to figure out why this miner is giving me only around 500 sol/s for 5 of the 6 GTX 1080ti. Only GPU 0 is getting 700 sol/s, the rest is working with only 40% PL for some strange reason. EWBF works just fine in this same rig.
Check your cpu usage pls, I'm heavier on it currently.
Nailed it, it's stuck at 100% all the time. It's an old dual core cpu.
October 19, 2017, 06:18:45 AM
I'm testing ZM v0.5.2 windows on 1080 ti rig, 2% hashrate better EWBF's miner and more efficiency than EWBF's.
But CPU usage more than 80%, in EWBF just 40 - 45%.
@dstm: you did nice job, please check CPU usage
win 10But CPU usage more than 80%, in EWBF just 40 - 45%.
@dstm: you did nice job, please check CPU usage
ZM v0.5.2 windows on 2x1070
9% CPU load
October 19, 2017, 06:13:15 AM
I'm testing ZM v0.5.2 windows on 1080 ti rig, 2% hashrate better EWBF's miner and more efficiency than EWBF's.
But CPU usage more than 80%, in EWBF just 40 - 45%.
@dstm: you did nice job, please check CPU usage
But CPU usage more than 80%, in EWBF just 40 - 45%.
@dstm: you did nice job, please check CPU usage
What windows version are you on?
October 19, 2017, 06:12:22 AM
I'm still not able to figure out why this miner is giving me only around 500 sol/s for 5 of the 6 GTX 1080ti. Only GPU 0 is getting 700 sol/s, the rest is working with only 40% PL for some strange reason. EWBF works just fine in this same rig.
Check your cpu usage pls, I'm heavier on it currently.
October 19, 2017, 06:03:24 AM
I'm testing ZM v0.5.2 windows on 1080 ti rig, 2% hashrate better EWBF's miner and more efficiency than EWBF's.
But CPU usage more than 80%, in EWBF just 40 - 45%.
@dstm: you did nice job, please check CPU usage
But CPU usage more than 80%, in EWBF just 40 - 45%.
@dstm: you did nice job, please check CPU usage
October 19, 2017, 06:02:19 AM
I'm still not able to figure out why this miner is giving me only around 500 sol/s for 5 of the 6 GTX 1080ti. Only GPU 0 is getting 700 sol/s, the rest is working with only 40% PL for some strange reason. EWBF works just fine in this same rig.
October 19, 2017, 06:00:02 AM
Amazing miner +20/+25 sols per card with 1080TI, total with my 4x1080TI 3130 sols. +100 than EWBF, i will try again when bitcoin gold appears.
October 19, 2017, 04:44:37 AM
Released EthControl 0.0.12 with ZM dstm Windows support. (https://github.com/JamesSmith2/EthControl/releases) (https://ethmonitoring.com)
What is this? Got a readme or introduction text we can look at?
Hi,
It's remote controlling for miner software, can view console from mobile, change configs etc. also notifies if rig stopped.
Full guide: https://ethmonitoring.com/site/guide-eth-control
Code:
1. Download EthControl (EthControl-0.0.12.zip)
2. Extract ethcontrol.zip
3. Start ethcontrol.exe
4. Insert rig name and access token
5. Press "Start"
6. Go to EthMonitoring.com and click "EthControl" menu
7. Add new config if not added yet
8. Go to new "Miners" and press console button right before "Edit" button on miner
9. Console visible and new configuration can bet set
October 19, 2017, 04:41:58 AM
For people that were asking about the telemtry option:
To start telemetry just write 'zm.exe ...... --telemetry=0.0.0.0:2222' (dont forget the '=') then you can use your browser to get stats with 'http://ip-of-your-pc:2222'
To start telemetry just write 'zm.exe ...... --telemetry=0.0.0.0:2222' (dont forget the '=') then you can use your browser to get stats with 'http://ip-of-your-pc:2222'
October 19, 2017, 04:34:32 AM
Hmmm, so something weird here. After about 6 hours of stable usage, the miner crashed. Now it won't run for more than a few minutes at the same overclock settings. I scaled them down, but it crashed again, so I scaled down further. After about five instance of scaling back my settings, I've gone back to ewbf for now until this can be a bit more stable. Not sure how I can provide useful log data or more info than this as the crash makes my graphics card fail completely and I have to shut down the PC 'blind' then reboot. Sometimes on the reboot the graphics card is still inactive and I need to completely power off the PC and restart.
Will see if similar issues happen with ewbf, in which case I think I might be looking at a damaged card here (?) which is odd considering the overclocking, power settings etc are actually lower than I usually use when mining with this rig.
It's about 150 or so less Sol/s (about 4% in total across 7 cards) but I'm getting tired of having to come reboot the machine. Very odd that it worked for so much of the day without a hitch but now just won't cooperate.
Will see if similar issues happen with ewbf, in which case I think I might be looking at a damaged card here (?) which is odd considering the overclocking, power settings etc are actually lower than I usually use when mining with this rig.
It's about 150 or so less Sol/s (about 4% in total across 7 cards) but I'm getting tired of having to come reboot the machine. Very odd that it worked for so much of the day without a hitch but now just won't cooperate.
Sounds like a hardware issue to me, especially because some GPUs don't work even after rebooting. In general: sn overclocked system might behave unpredictable.
October 19, 2017, 04:27:51 AM
'GPU rejected shares' BtcZ mining on miningspeed.com.
Here are some grab from zm cmd windows 10 creators,
C:\zm>zm --server asia.miningspeed.com --port 3072 --user t1g2hp1DP3wMBvKSCCcJY2X8UmsBAvcP4gc.rzbtcz02 --pass x --telemetry=192.168.2.89:4100
# telemetry server started
# GPU0 connected to: asia.miningspeed.com:3072
# GPU0 server set difficulty to: 001aaaaaaaaaaaab00000000...
# GPU1 connected to: asia.miningspeed.com:3072
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 28"]
# GPU1 server set difficulty to: 001aaaaaaaaaaaab00000000...
# GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 30"]
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 29"]
# GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
> GPU1 61C Sol/s: 433.2 Sol/W: 4.18 Avg: 433.2 I/s: 232.2 Sh/s: 0.300 +++
> GPU0 64C Sol/s: 431.1 Sol/W: 4.07 Avg: 431.1 I/s: 229.0 Sh/s: 0.400 ++++
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
# GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 29"]
========= Sol/s: 864.3 Sol/W: 4.13 Avg: 864.3 I/s: 461.3 Sh/s: 0.700
GPU1 56C Sol/s: 8.5 Sol/W: 2.16 Avg: 220.9 I/s: 4.7 Sh/s: 0.150
========= Sol/s: 439.6 Sol/W: 3.12 Avg: 651.9 I/s: 233.8 Sh/s: 0.550
GPU0 59C Sol/s: 7.4 Sol/W: 2.07 Avg: 219.2 I/s: 4.1 Sh/s: 0.200
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 29"]
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 30"]
GPU1 62C Sol/s: 437.4 Sol/W: 2.84 Avg: 293.0 I/s: 230.2 Sh/s: 0.100
========= Sol/s: 444.7 Sol/W: 2.46 Avg: 512.3 I/s: 234.3 Sh/s: 0.300
GPU0 64C Sol/s: 431.8 Sol/W: 2.79 Avg: 290.1 I/s: 227.2 Sh/s: 0.233 +++
# GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
anyone could shed some light on this ? Many thanks.
Here are some grab from zm cmd windows 10 creators,
C:\zm>zm --server asia.miningspeed.com --port 3072 --user t1g2hp1DP3wMBvKSCCcJY2X8UmsBAvcP4gc.rzbtcz02 --pass x --telemetry=192.168.2.89:4100
# telemetry server started
# GPU0 connected to: asia.miningspeed.com:3072
# GPU0 server set difficulty to: 001aaaaaaaaaaaab00000000...
# GPU1 connected to: asia.miningspeed.com:3072
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 28"]
# GPU1 server set difficulty to: 001aaaaaaaaaaaab00000000...
# GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 30"]
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 29"]
# GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
> GPU1 61C Sol/s: 433.2 Sol/W: 4.18 Avg: 433.2 I/s: 232.2 Sh/s: 0.300 +++
> GPU0 64C Sol/s: 431.1 Sol/W: 4.07 Avg: 431.1 I/s: 229.0 Sh/s: 0.400 ++++
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
# GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 29"]
========= Sol/s: 864.3 Sol/W: 4.13 Avg: 864.3 I/s: 461.3 Sh/s: 0.700
GPU1 56C Sol/s: 8.5 Sol/W: 2.16 Avg: 220.9 I/s: 4.7 Sh/s: 0.150
========= Sol/s: 439.6 Sol/W: 3.12 Avg: 651.9 I/s: 233.8 Sh/s: 0.550
GPU0 59C Sol/s: 7.4 Sol/W: 2.07 Avg: 219.2 I/s: 4.1 Sh/s: 0.200
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 29"]
# GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 30"]
GPU1 62C Sol/s: 437.4 Sol/W: 2.84 Avg: 293.0 I/s: 230.2 Sh/s: 0.100
========= Sol/s: 444.7 Sol/W: 2.46 Avg: 512.3 I/s: 234.3 Sh/s: 0.300
GPU0 64C Sol/s: 431.8 Sol/W: 2.79 Avg: 290.1 I/s: 227.2 Sh/s: 0.233 +++
# GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
anyone could shed some light on this ? Many thanks.
Thx for reporting - will check.
October 19, 2017, 04:27:14 AM
Mini report for the past 12 hours. The average speed according to the statistics of flaypool was 1540 and it was 1580. Ie, the gain is 2.5%. It seems to be not bad. But considering 2% devfee there is a gain of 0.5%.
Everything that is shown by the pool belongs to you - you don't have to subtract the dev fee from it, so if I understand you correctly your earnings increased by 2.5%.
For people that are doing tests:
The share rate is subjected to probability, this is why it's jumping all the time on the pool side. If you want to get robust numbers run it for about 24h, the longer it runs the more accurate to pool is able to estimate your solution rate, be aware some pools might report wrong numbers.
My numbers are exact it was tested by people that are using the linux version , however it's ofc natural for you to check this.
October 19, 2017, 04:20:32 AM
Not sure what causes this (drivers? Afterburner? Your miner?) but my MSI Duke GTX 1070 in my desktop is only drawing 45% power. Nice Sol/W rate but not nearly as many Sol/s as I know this card can do (it can sit at 500 easily).
Anyone know why this happens? Even though afterburner is set to 80% power limit, something is throttling it to 45%
Anyone know why this happens? Even though afterburner is set to 80% power limit, something is throttling it to 45%
How you get 500 sols with a GTX 1070? Which miner and settings you are using?
THX
October 19, 2017, 04:08:21 AM
For me windows version ignores --telemetry key, and just always uses 127.0.0.1:2222
Tnx you friend.
Jump to: