Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 146. (Read 224961 times)

What is this? Got a readme or introduction text we can look at?

Released EthControl 0.0.12 with ZM dstm Windows support. (https://github.com/JamesSmith2/EthControl/releases) (https://ethmonitoring.com)

Hmmm, so something weird here. After about 6 hours of stable usage, the miner crashed. Now it won't run for more than a few minutes at the same overclock settings. I scaled them down, but it crashed again, so I scaled down further. After about five instance of scaling back my settings, I've gone back to ewbf for now until this can be a bit more stable. Not sure how I can provide useful log data or more info than this as the crash makes my graphics card fail completely and I have to shut down the PC 'blind' then reboot. Sometimes on the reboot the graphics card is still inactive and I need to completely power off the PC and restart.

Will see if similar issues happen with ewbf, in which case I think I might be looking at a damaged card here (?) which is odd considering the overclocking, power settings etc are actually lower than I usually use when mining with this rig.

It's about 150 or so less Sol/s (about 4% in total across 7 cards) but I'm getting tired of having to come reboot the machine. Very odd that it worked for so much of the day without a hitch but now just won't cooperate.

> : indicates that a new job was received
+ : indicates one submitted share
*  : indicates one submitted devfee-share=2% (commission for the use of miner)
= : sum of the stats if mining on multiple GPUs

EWBF miner gives more performance, and you can set dev fee to 1% with same hash boost. So no, 2% in this case is way too much.

Giving me 100 sols more than EWBF.
Nice work!

How to use --telemetry parametr?

#  telemetry server started

What shoud i type in browser and what default port for telemetry ?

Tnx

If the "+" is a share, what is "*"?

ewbf also has 2%. So - no difference here.

'GPU rejected shares' BtcZ mining on miningspeed.com.
Here are some grab from zm cmd windows 10 creators,


C:\zm>zm --server asia.miningspeed.com --port 3072 --user t1g2hp1DP3wMBvKSCCcJY2X8UmsBAvcP4gc.rzbtcz02 --pass x --telemetry=192.168.2.89:4100
#  telemetry server started
#  GPU0 connected to: asia.miningspeed.com:3072
#  GPU0 server set difficulty to: 001aaaaaaaaaaaab00000000...
#  GPU1 connected to: asia.miningspeed.com:3072
#  GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 28"]
#  GPU1 server set difficulty to: 001aaaaaaaaaaaab00000000...
#  GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 30"]
#  GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 29"]
#  GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
#  GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
>  GPU1 61C  Sol/s: 433.2  Sol/W: 4.18  Avg: 433.2  I/s: 232.2  Sh/s: 0.300  +++
>  GPU0 64C  Sol/s: 431.1  Sol/W: 4.07  Avg: 431.1  I/s: 229.0  Sh/s: 0.400  ++++
#  GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
#  GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 29"]
   ========= Sol/s: 864.3  Sol/W: 4.13  Avg: 864.3  I/s: 461.3  Sh/s: 0.700
   GPU1 56C  Sol/s: 8.5    Sol/W: 2.16  Avg: 220.9  I/s: 4.7    Sh/s: 0.150
   ========= Sol/s: 439.6  Sol/W: 3.12  Avg: 651.9  I/s: 233.8  Sh/s: 0.550
   GPU0 59C  Sol/s: 7.4    Sol/W: 2.07  Avg: 219.2  I/s: 4.1    Sh/s: 0.200
#  GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]
#  GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 29"]
#  GPU0 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 30"]
   GPU1 62C  Sol/s: 437.4  Sol/W: 2.84  Avg: 293.0  I/s: 230.2  Sh/s: 0.100
   ========= Sol/s: 444.7  Sol/W: 2.46  Avg: 512.3  I/s: 234.3  Sh/s: 0.300
   GPU0 64C  Sol/s: 431.8  Sol/W: 2.79  Avg: 290.1  I/s: 227.2  Sh/s: 0.233  +++
#  GPU1 rejected share: [20,"invalid solution 31"]

anyone could shed some light on this ? Many thanks.

Not more than 1%. Then it makes sense all this, and just play in new toys without having any special profit changes in the end!

Refine from me WIN 10.

What is the dev fee of the alternative miner that you would use?

Mini report for the past 12 hours. The average speed according to the statistics of flaypool was 1540 and it was 1580. Ie, the gain is 2.5%. It seems to be not bad. But considering 2% devfee there is a gain of 0.5%.

Not sure what causes this (drivers? Afterburner? Your miner?) but my MSI Duke GTX 1070 in my desktop is only drawing 45% power. Nice Sol/W rate but not nearly as many Sol/s as I know this card can do (it can sit at 500 easily).



Anyone know why this happens? Even though afterburner is set to 80% power limit, something is throttling it to 45%

Hey, testing this for a few minutes on Windows 10 fall creators update, with an 1060 6g at 2088MHz core and 9100MHz memory and 387.92 drivers, I get an average of 349 Sol/s, pretty good (I get around 335 with ewbf's)


https://i.imgur.com/SoGsUKw.jpg

Thanks! That's exactly what I thought the reason was, actually
You should mention it somewhere in description here, could be useful for other people using port forwarding/proxy.
However, for people like me (with isolated local networks, limited number of open ports and no access to external port management) - there is another issue. It seems you've hardcoded pool addresses for devfee, so they don't actually went through proxy even if I forward the right port (3443 in my case). I've managed to solve it easily by additionally remapping local port AND pool hostname (3proxy+edited windows hosts file, in my case). Hope it also come in handy for others...

Those are all Asus DUAL OC GTX 1070s.

pretty nice, which one you bought? Version? shop?

Not sure exactly how long it's been running, but going for about three hours or so, and looking pretty stable:

You have to enable telemetry e.g. 'zm ..... --telemetry=0.0.0.0:2222' and your pc that's running zm must be reachable, that's all.