Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 159. (Read 224961 times)
September 26, 2017, 07:11:09 AM
gpu chip + 80mhz, memory +800mhz,
September 26, 2017, 12:48:12 AM
wait for windows version too.
i check itzcash - 280sol on GTX 1060 3Gb, same as in another miner.
with overclock - 290sol
I dont understand miners used windows for mining.
Linux is better os for any good miner soft and it's stable os. Windows is for novices (windoze-only nicehash etc)
September 26, 2017, 12:33:38 AM
5x1070 OC
Flypool Statistics: http://oi63.tinypic.com/v4osuh.jpg
Local: ~2190 Sols/sec
Flypool: ~2085 Sols/sec
~5% difference (2% should be fee)
For next version i vote for API support ;-)
Btw, nicehash doesnt work very well with your miner. (extranounce support is missing)
Code:
GPU1 57°C Sol/s: 444.5 Sol/W: 4.05 Avg: 444.2 I/s: 238.3 Sh/s: 0.111
GPU3 58°C Sol/s: 444.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.2 I/s: 233.2 Sh/s: 0.110
GPU0 60°C Sol/s: 436.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.6 I/s: 233.7 Sh/s: 0.106
GPU2 59°C Sol/s: 435.3 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 439.6 I/s: 235.8 Sh/s: 0.106 +
GPU4 57°C Sol/s: 437.9 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 440.5 I/s: 236.2 Sh/s: 0.106 +
========== Sol/s: 2197.9 Sol/W: 4.00 Avg: 2195.0 I/s: 1177.2 Sh/s: 0.538
GPU3 58°C Sol/s: 444.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.2 I/s: 233.2 Sh/s: 0.110
GPU0 60°C Sol/s: 436.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.6 I/s: 233.7 Sh/s: 0.106
GPU2 59°C Sol/s: 435.3 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 439.6 I/s: 235.8 Sh/s: 0.106 +
GPU4 57°C Sol/s: 437.9 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 440.5 I/s: 236.2 Sh/s: 0.106 +
========== Sol/s: 2197.9 Sol/W: 4.00 Avg: 2195.0 I/s: 1177.2 Sh/s: 0.538
Flypool Statistics: http://oi63.tinypic.com/v4osuh.jpg
Local: ~2190 Sols/sec
Flypool: ~2085 Sols/sec
~5% difference (2% should be fee)
For next version i vote for API support ;-)
Btw, nicehash doesnt work very well with your miner. (extranounce support is missing)
Can you please post your OC and Power Limit settings? I'm also using 1070s and only get 3.82 Sol/W
Thanks!
Code:
export DISPLAY=:0
nvidia-smi -pm ENABLED
nvidia-smi -pl 110
export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
DISPLAY=:0 XAUTHORITY=/home/mining/.Xauthority nvidia-settings -a GPUPowerMizerMode=1 | logger
DISPLAY=:0 XAUTHORITY=/home/mining/.Xauthority nvidia-settings -a GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset[3]=1000 | logger
DISPLAY=:0 XAUTHORITY=/home/mining/.Xauthority nvidia-settings -a GPUGraphicsClockOffset[3]=100 | logger
nvidia-smi -pm ENABLED
nvidia-smi -pl 110
export GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0
export GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
DISPLAY=:0 XAUTHORITY=/home/mining/.Xauthority nvidia-settings -a GPUPowerMizerMode=1 | logger
DISPLAY=:0 XAUTHORITY=/home/mining/.Xauthority nvidia-settings -a GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset[3]=1000 | logger
DISPLAY=:0 XAUTHORITY=/home/mining/.Xauthority nvidia-settings -a GPUGraphicsClockOffset[3]=100 | logger
September 25, 2017, 12:52:05 PM
5x1070 OC
Flypool Statistics: http://oi63.tinypic.com/v4osuh.jpg
Local: ~2190 Sols/sec
Flypool: ~2085 Sols/sec
~5% difference (2% should be fee)
For next version i vote for API support ;-)
Btw, nicehash doesnt work very well with your miner. (extranounce support is missing)
Code:
GPU1 57°C Sol/s: 444.5 Sol/W: 4.05 Avg: 444.2 I/s: 238.3 Sh/s: 0.111
GPU3 58°C Sol/s: 444.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.2 I/s: 233.2 Sh/s: 0.110
GPU0 60°C Sol/s: 436.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.6 I/s: 233.7 Sh/s: 0.106
GPU2 59°C Sol/s: 435.3 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 439.6 I/s: 235.8 Sh/s: 0.106 +
GPU4 57°C Sol/s: 437.9 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 440.5 I/s: 236.2 Sh/s: 0.106 +
========== Sol/s: 2197.9 Sol/W: 4.00 Avg: 2195.0 I/s: 1177.2 Sh/s: 0.538
GPU3 58°C Sol/s: 444.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.2 I/s: 233.2 Sh/s: 0.110
GPU0 60°C Sol/s: 436.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.6 I/s: 233.7 Sh/s: 0.106
GPU2 59°C Sol/s: 435.3 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 439.6 I/s: 235.8 Sh/s: 0.106 +
GPU4 57°C Sol/s: 437.9 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 440.5 I/s: 236.2 Sh/s: 0.106 +
========== Sol/s: 2197.9 Sol/W: 4.00 Avg: 2195.0 I/s: 1177.2 Sh/s: 0.538
Flypool Statistics: http://oi63.tinypic.com/v4osuh.jpg
Local: ~2190 Sols/sec
Flypool: ~2085 Sols/sec
~5% difference (2% should be fee)
For next version i vote for API support ;-)
Btw, nicehash doesnt work very well with your miner. (extranounce support is missing)
Can you please post your OC and Power Limit settings? I'm also using 1070s and only get 3.82 Sol/W
Thanks!
September 25, 2017, 12:22:05 PM
5x1070 OC
Flypool Statistics:
Local: ~2190 Sols/sec
Flypool: ~2085 Sols/sec
~5% difference (2% should be fee)
For next version i vote for API support ;-)
Btw, nicehash doesnt work very well with your miner. (extranounce support is missing)
Code:
GPU1 57°C Sol/s: 444.5 Sol/W: 4.05 Avg: 444.2 I/s: 238.3 Sh/s: 0.111
GPU3 58°C Sol/s: 444.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.2 I/s: 233.2 Sh/s: 0.110
GPU0 60°C Sol/s: 436.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.6 I/s: 233.7 Sh/s: 0.106
GPU2 59°C Sol/s: 435.3 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 439.6 I/s: 235.8 Sh/s: 0.106 +
GPU4 57°C Sol/s: 437.9 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 440.5 I/s: 236.2 Sh/s: 0.106 +
========== Sol/s: 2197.9 Sol/W: 4.00 Avg: 2195.0 I/s: 1177.2 Sh/s: 0.538
GPU3 58°C Sol/s: 444.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.2 I/s: 233.2 Sh/s: 0.110
GPU0 60°C Sol/s: 436.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.6 I/s: 233.7 Sh/s: 0.106
GPU2 59°C Sol/s: 435.3 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 439.6 I/s: 235.8 Sh/s: 0.106 +
GPU4 57°C Sol/s: 437.9 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 440.5 I/s: 236.2 Sh/s: 0.106 +
========== Sol/s: 2197.9 Sol/W: 4.00 Avg: 2195.0 I/s: 1177.2 Sh/s: 0.538
Flypool Statistics:
Local: ~2190 Sols/sec
Flypool: ~2085 Sols/sec
~5% difference (2% should be fee)
For next version i vote for API support ;-)
Btw, nicehash doesnt work very well with your miner. (extranounce support is missing)
Thx for the numbers, Sol/W looks pretty good.
Dev fee is exactly 2%. If you can't reproduce this number on your pool after running it long enough you should ask your pool why you're missing 3% - 3% are significant. This is why I'm calculating an average, it's there so that you can check the pool numbers.
I'll add extranounce support in the next version.
API will be there in one of the next releases.
September 25, 2017, 11:58:56 AM
5x1070 OC
Flypool Statistics: http://oi63.tinypic.com/v4osuh.jpg
Local: ~2190 Sols/sec
Flypool: ~2085 Sols/sec
~5% difference (2% should be fee)
For next version i vote for API support ;-)
Btw, nicehash doesnt work very well with your miner. (extranounce support is missing)
Code:
GPU1 57°C Sol/s: 444.5 Sol/W: 4.05 Avg: 444.2 I/s: 238.3 Sh/s: 0.111
GPU3 58°C Sol/s: 444.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.2 I/s: 233.2 Sh/s: 0.110
GPU0 60°C Sol/s: 436.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.6 I/s: 233.7 Sh/s: 0.106
GPU2 59°C Sol/s: 435.3 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 439.6 I/s: 235.8 Sh/s: 0.106 +
GPU4 57°C Sol/s: 437.9 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 440.5 I/s: 236.2 Sh/s: 0.106 +
========== Sol/s: 2197.9 Sol/W: 4.00 Avg: 2195.0 I/s: 1177.2 Sh/s: 0.538
GPU3 58°C Sol/s: 444.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.2 I/s: 233.2 Sh/s: 0.110
GPU0 60°C Sol/s: 436.1 Sol/W: 3.97 Avg: 435.6 I/s: 233.7 Sh/s: 0.106
GPU2 59°C Sol/s: 435.3 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 439.6 I/s: 235.8 Sh/s: 0.106 +
GPU4 57°C Sol/s: 437.9 Sol/W: 4.01 Avg: 440.5 I/s: 236.2 Sh/s: 0.106 +
========== Sol/s: 2197.9 Sol/W: 4.00 Avg: 2195.0 I/s: 1177.2 Sh/s: 0.538
Flypool Statistics: http://oi63.tinypic.com/v4osuh.jpg
Local: ~2190 Sols/sec
Flypool: ~2085 Sols/sec
~5% difference (2% should be fee)
For next version i vote for API support ;-)
Btw, nicehash doesnt work very well with your miner. (extranounce support is missing)
September 25, 2017, 07:01:15 AM
wait for windows version too.
i check itzcash - 280sol on GTX 1060 3Gb, same as in another miner.
with overclock - 290sol
I dont understand miners used windows for mining.
Linux is better os for any good miner soft and it's stable os. Windows is for novices (windoze-only nicehash etc)
I run both and I had more crash (well I had zero with Windows 10) with Linux.
Both have cons and pros.
That "noob" OS thing is just silly IMO.
September 25, 2017, 06:17:31 AM
wait for windows version too.
i check itzcash - 280sol on GTX 1060 3Gb, same as in another miner.
with overclock - 290sol
I dont understand miners used windows for mining.
Linux is better os for any good miner soft and it's stable os. Windows is for novices (windoze-only nicehash etc)
September 24, 2017, 04:09:59 PM
Thought I'd share some OC settings after running a few tests
These are for 1070s running on nvOC v19
With these settings I'm getting the following results on a 7 GPU (4 different 1070 models) rig...
Avg. Sol. 3146.0
Avg. I/s 1683.8
Avg. Sol/W 3.82
Temps are between 49c and 61c with fans at only 48%
These are for 1070s running on nvOC v19
- Power Limit: 118w
- Core Overclock: 110
- Mem Overclock: 600
With these settings I'm getting the following results on a 7 GPU (4 different 1070 models) rig...
Avg. Sol. 3146.0
Avg. I/s 1683.8
Avg. Sol/W 3.82
Temps are between 49c and 61c with fans at only 48%
is this miner built in the nvOC distro now ?
Yes, thx to fullzero - he did a lot tests before including it.
thanks for the info but I dont see it in 1bash ? Are you using v19 or v19.1 ?
Thanks again
I'm not familiar with nvOC, it's probably best to ask this on the nvOC thread.
September 24, 2017, 04:00:50 PM
Thought I'd share some OC settings after running a few tests
These are for 1070s running on nvOC v19
With these settings I'm getting the following results on a 7 GPU (4 different 1070 models) rig...
Avg. Sol. 3146.0
Avg. I/s 1683.8
Avg. Sol/W 3.82
Temps are between 49c and 61c with fans at only 48%
These are for 1070s running on nvOC v19
- Power Limit: 118w
- Core Overclock: 110
- Mem Overclock: 600
With these settings I'm getting the following results on a 7 GPU (4 different 1070 models) rig...
Avg. Sol. 3146.0
Avg. I/s 1683.8
Avg. Sol/W 3.82
Temps are between 49c and 61c with fans at only 48%
is this miner built in the nvOC distro now ?
Yes, thx to fullzero - he did a lot tests before including it.
thanks for the info but I dont see it in 1bash ? Are you using v19 or v19.1 ?
Thanks again
September 24, 2017, 03:26:46 PM
Thought I'd share some OC settings after running a few tests
These are for 1070s running on nvOC v19
With these settings I'm getting the following results on a 7 GPU (4 different 1070 models) rig...
Avg. Sol. 3146.0
Avg. I/s 1683.8
Avg. Sol/W 3.82
Temps are between 49c and 61c with fans at only 48%
These are for 1070s running on nvOC v19
- Power Limit: 118w
- Core Overclock: 110
- Mem Overclock: 600
With these settings I'm getting the following results on a 7 GPU (4 different 1070 models) rig...
Avg. Sol. 3146.0
Avg. I/s 1683.8
Avg. Sol/W 3.82
Temps are between 49c and 61c with fans at only 48%
is this miner built in the nvOC distro now ?
Yes, thx to fullzero - he did a lot tests before including it.
September 24, 2017, 03:20:37 PM
Thought I'd share some OC settings after running a few tests
These are for 1070s running on nvOC v19
With these settings I'm getting the following results on a 7 GPU (4 different 1070 models) rig...
Avg. Sol. 3146.0
Avg. I/s 1683.8
Avg. Sol/W 3.82
Temps are between 49c and 61c with fans at only 48%
These are for 1070s running on nvOC v19
- Power Limit: 118w
- Core Overclock: 110
- Mem Overclock: 600
With these settings I'm getting the following results on a 7 GPU (4 different 1070 models) rig...
Avg. Sol. 3146.0
Avg. I/s 1683.8
Avg. Sol/W 3.82
Temps are between 49c and 61c with fans at only 48%
is this miner built in the nvOC distro now ?
September 24, 2017, 02:58:32 PM
New Version 0.4.5
fix: bad miner performance when using --temp-target
on systems with many GPUs
reduce temperature controller cpu usage
I've redesigned the controlling loop - it has some important improvements. You might test the new temperature controller design by setting different --temp-target values and observe the controlling behaviour with nvidia-smi. I recommend to to set your fan speed to 100%, it's important to have an constant fan speed value since otherwise you'll get two controlling loops (fan controller + temp controller) with feedback which might produce unpredictable performance results.
fix: bad miner performance when using --temp-target
on systems with many GPUs
reduce temperature controller cpu usage
I've redesigned the controlling loop - it has some important improvements. You might test the new temperature controller design by setting different --temp-target values and observe the controlling behaviour with nvidia-smi. I recommend to to set your fan speed to 100%, it's important to have an constant fan speed value since otherwise you'll get two controlling loops (fan controller + temp controller) with feedback which might produce unpredictable performance results.
September 24, 2017, 12:02:35 PM
dstm's ZCash Cuda miner
original thread link with your credit posted on https://forum.z.cash/t/dstm-s-zcash-cuda-miner/21658thank you in advance for your work
Thx for informing
September 24, 2017, 11:43:06 AM
dstm's ZCash Cuda miner
original thread link with your credit posted on https://forum.z.cash/t/dstm-s-zcash-cuda-miner/21658thank you in advance for your work
September 24, 2017, 05:07:54 AM
Just a small update.
There is currently a small issue that causes the performance to drop significantly (60%) on large systems when using temp-target - so the performance might be bad for some people currently. It's caused by the high sampling rate I'm using for temperature measurements. The driver starts to cause high latencies on systems with many GPUs, this was unexpected. Since I'm controlling the performance of each GPU based on this measurements I had to rework the temp-controller such that it's working properly with low sampling rates. I'm currently testing a new version, if it passes tests I'll upload it today.
The miner seems pretty stable now - I've already worked out the technical details of the windows port. I expect to have a working version in 1-2 weeks.
There is currently a small issue that causes the performance to drop significantly (60%) on large systems when using temp-target - so the performance might be bad for some people currently. It's caused by the high sampling rate I'm using for temperature measurements. The driver starts to cause high latencies on systems with many GPUs, this was unexpected. Since I'm controlling the performance of each GPU based on this measurements I had to rework the temp-controller such that it's working properly with low sampling rates. I'm currently testing a new version, if it passes tests I'll upload it today.
The miner seems pretty stable now - I've already worked out the technical details of the windows port. I expect to have a working version in 1-2 weeks.
September 24, 2017, 03:29:40 AM
waiting for dstm's ZCash miner for Windows, please 
yep, same to me!2dstm
any news about time of windows release?
September 23, 2017, 11:14:58 PM
I'll run some test on suprnova. Did you use ssl to connect to suprnova?
If reconnection is unreliable, I'll make it configurable as a temporal workaround in the next release.
If reconnection is unreliable, I'll make it configurable as a temporal workaround in the next release.
No SSL, just "--server zec-eu.suprnova.cc --port 2142 --user BLABLABLA.RIG1 --pass d=2048"
September 23, 2017, 10:23:57 PM
waiting for dstm's ZCash miner for Windows, please
September 23, 2017, 03:39:53 PM
While using suprnova.cc I noticed that the "retry on connection problem" isn't that reliable. Doesn't matter if it's a pool- or a miner thing, but could you make it configuable to just exit on error.
I'll run some test on suprnova. Did you use ssl to connect to suprnova?
If reconnection is unreliable, I'll make it configurable as a temporal workaround in the next release.
Jump to: