[ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 160.

ShowMeCoins

member

Activity: 129

Merit: 11

While using suprnova.cc I noticed that the "retry on connection problem" isn't that reliable. Doesn't matter if it's a pool- or a miner thing, but could you make it configuable to just exit on error.

MarketGamer

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Thought I'd share some OC settings after running a few tests

These are for 1070s running on nvOC v19

Power Limit: 118w
Core Overclock: 110
Mem Overclock: 600

With these settings I'm getting the following results on a 7 GPU (4 different 1070 models) rig...

Avg. Sol. 3146.0
Avg. I/s 1683.8
Avg. Sol/W 3.82

Temps are between 49c and 61c with fans at only 48%

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Note Version 0.4.4

For people that rely on temperature control:
The temperature controller might work not properly.
I'll provide an update soon.

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: ShowMeCoins on September 22, 2017, 07:14:09 AM

Quote from: dstm on September 22, 2017, 06:52:44 AM

Very strange, could you pls try without --temp-target.

It shouldn't, but it worked...

Without:

Code:

# /opt/miners/bin/zm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --port 3333 --user t1SBXPFpggB4ynb6B3ybYU8dXYeM7qzpjer.RIG1 --pass d=32000
# GPU0 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU0 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU1 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU1 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU2 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU2 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU3 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU3 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU4 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU4 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU5 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU5 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU6 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU6 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
> GPU0 47°C Sol/s: 746.9 Sol/W: 3.07 Avg: 746.9 I/s: 399.6 Sh/s: 0.300 +++
> GPU1 53°C Sol/s: 749.3 Sol/W: 3.10 Avg: 749.3 I/s: 408.0 Sh/s: 0.300 +++
> GPU2 48°C Sol/s: 746.9 Sol/W: 3.07 Avg: 746.9 I/s: 403.6 Sh/s: 0.100 +
GPU3 46°C Sol/s: 763.2 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 763.2 I/s: 408.6 Sh/s: 0.100 +
> GPU4 49°C Sol/s: 764.3 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 764.3 I/s: 404.8 Sh/s: 0.400 ++++*
> GPU5 45°C Sol/s: 749.5 Sol/W: 3.07 Avg: 749.5 I/s: 402.4 Sh/s: 0.200 ++
> GPU6 45°C Sol/s: 762.8 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 762.8 I/s: 407.3 Sh/s: 0.100 +
========== Sol/s: 5283.0 Sol/W: 3.10 Avg: 5283.0 I/s: 2834.3 Sh/s: 1.500

With:

Code:

# /opt/miners/bin/zm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --port 3333 --user t1SBXPFpggB4ynb6B3ybYU8dXYeM7qzpjer.RIG1 --pass d=32000 --temp-target=72
# GPU0 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU0 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU1 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU1 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU2 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU2 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU3 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU3 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU4 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU4 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU5 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU5 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU6 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU6 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
> GPU0 41°C Sol/s: 684.5 Sol/W: 2.90 Avg: 684.5 I/s: 364.3 Sh/s: 0.100 +
> GPU1 48°C Sol/s: 647.4 Sol/W: 2.81 Avg: 647.4 I/s: 348.5 Sh/s: 0.000
> GPU2 43°C Sol/s: 600.1 Sol/W: 2.64 Avg: 600.1 I/s: 324.5 Sh/s: 0.000
> GPU3 40°C Sol/s: 582.2 Sol/W: 2.51 Avg: 582.2 I/s: 308.5 Sh/s: 0.000
> GPU4 44°C Sol/s: 536.8 Sol/W: 2.59 Avg: 536.8 I/s: 286.8 Sh/s: 0.200 ++
> GPU5 40°C Sol/s: 478.5 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 478.5 I/s: 255.6 Sh/s: 0.200 ++
> GPU6 39°C Sol/s: 452.6 Sol/W: 2.37 Avg: 452.6 I/s: 243.1 Sh/s: 0.300 +++
========== Sol/s: 3982.1 Sol/W: 2.63 Avg: 3982.1 I/s: 2131.3 Sh/s: 0.800

Thx, for reporing, I'll check what's going wrong

ShowMeCoins

member

Activity: 129

Merit: 11

Quote from: dstm on September 22, 2017, 06:52:44 AM

Very strange, could you pls try without --temp-target.

It shouldn't, but it worked...

Without:

Code:

# /opt/miners/bin/zm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --port 3333 --user t1SBXPFpggB4ynb6B3ybYU8dXYeM7qzpjer.RIG1 --pass d=32000
# GPU0 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU0 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU1 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU1 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU2 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU2 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU3 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU3 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU4 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU4 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU5 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU5 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU6 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU6 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
> GPU0 47°C Sol/s: 746.9 Sol/W: 3.07 Avg: 746.9 I/s: 399.6 Sh/s: 0.300 +++
> GPU1 53°C Sol/s: 749.3 Sol/W: 3.10 Avg: 749.3 I/s: 408.0 Sh/s: 0.300 +++
> GPU2 48°C Sol/s: 746.9 Sol/W: 3.07 Avg: 746.9 I/s: 403.6 Sh/s: 0.100 +
GPU3 46°C Sol/s: 763.2 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 763.2 I/s: 408.6 Sh/s: 0.100 +
> GPU4 49°C Sol/s: 764.3 Sol/W: 3.13 Avg: 764.3 I/s: 404.8 Sh/s: 0.400 ++++*
> GPU5 45°C Sol/s: 749.5 Sol/W: 3.07 Avg: 749.5 I/s: 402.4 Sh/s: 0.200 ++
> GPU6 45°C Sol/s: 762.8 Sol/W: 3.14 Avg: 762.8 I/s: 407.3 Sh/s: 0.100 +
========== Sol/s: 5283.0 Sol/W: 3.10 Avg: 5283.0 I/s: 2834.3 Sh/s: 1.500

With:

Code:

# /opt/miners/bin/zm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --port 3333 --user t1SBXPFpggB4ynb6B3ybYU8dXYeM7qzpjer.RIG1 --pass d=32000 --temp-target=72
# GPU0 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU0 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU1 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU1 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU2 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU2 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU3 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU3 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU4 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU4 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU5 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU5 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
# GPU6 connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
# GPU6 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1...
> GPU0 41°C Sol/s: 684.5 Sol/W: 2.90 Avg: 684.5 I/s: 364.3 Sh/s: 0.100 +
> GPU1 48°C Sol/s: 647.4 Sol/W: 2.81 Avg: 647.4 I/s: 348.5 Sh/s: 0.000
> GPU2 43°C Sol/s: 600.1 Sol/W: 2.64 Avg: 600.1 I/s: 324.5 Sh/s: 0.000
> GPU3 40°C Sol/s: 582.2 Sol/W: 2.51 Avg: 582.2 I/s: 308.5 Sh/s: 0.000
> GPU4 44°C Sol/s: 536.8 Sol/W: 2.59 Avg: 536.8 I/s: 286.8 Sh/s: 0.200 ++
> GPU5 40°C Sol/s: 478.5 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 478.5 I/s: 255.6 Sh/s: 0.200 ++
> GPU6 39°C Sol/s: 452.6 Sol/W: 2.37 Avg: 452.6 I/s: 243.1 Sh/s: 0.300 +++
========== Sol/s: 3982.1 Sol/W: 2.63 Avg: 3982.1 I/s: 2131.3 Sh/s: 0.800

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: ShowMeCoins on September 22, 2017, 06:36:04 AM

Quote from: dstm on September 22, 2017, 05:58:07 AM

Could you please provide more information?

How did you start zm? (parameters)
What CPU are you on? CPU usage?
GPU usage?

To init. my cards I use:

Code:

echo 5 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic
echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_oops
Xorg :0 &
sleep 5
export DISPLAY=:0
xset -dpms s off
/usr/bin/nvidia-settings -a GPUFanControlState=1
/usr/bin/nvidia-settings -a GPUTargetFanSpeed=100
/usr/bin/nvidia-settings -a GPUGraphicsClockOffset[3]=68
/usr/bin/nvidia-settings -a GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset[3]=684

nvidia-smi -i 0 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 1 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 2 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 3 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 4 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 5 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 6 -pl 245

xset -dpms s off

It uses an "Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4500 @ 3.50GHz", 8Gb Ram, ASRock H110 BTC etc. mainboard.

CPU usage 'mpstat -u 2', around 01:30:45 monit kicked in:

Code:

01:30:31 PM all 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.74
01:30:33 PM all 0.25 0.00 1.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.50
01:30:35 PM all 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.74
01:30:37 PM all 0.25 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.00
01:30:39 PM all 0.50 0.00 10.30 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88.94
01:30:41 PM all 0.25 0.00 1.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 97.99
01:30:43 PM all 2.28 0.00 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88.61
01:30:45 PM all 6.57 0.00 17.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.51
01:30:47 PM all 8.86 0.00 24.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.33
01:30:49 PM all 10.35 0.00 33.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.06
01:30:51 PM all 11.65 0.00 41.01 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.09

01:30:51 PM CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %guest %gnice %idle
01:30:53 PM all 11.93 0.00 46.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.12
01:30:55 PM all 10.55 0.00 49.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.20
01:30:57 PM all 12.03 0.00 55.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.58
01:30:59 PM all 9.09 0.00 58.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.83
01:31:01 PM all 8.33 0.00 57.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.09
01:31:03 PM all 7.30 0.00 57.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.01

GPU Usage 'nvidia-smi':

Code:

Startup: "screen -dmS flypool /opt/ramdrive/zm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --port 3333 --user t1SBXPFpggB4ynb6B3ybYU8dXYeM7qzpjer.RIG1 --pass d=32000 --temp-target 72"
EWBF uses same setting, different syntax.

Very strange, could you pls try without --temp-target.

ShowMeCoins

member

Activity: 129

Merit: 11

Quote from: dstm on September 22, 2017, 05:58:07 AM

Could you please provide more information?

How did you start zm? (parameters)
What CPU are you on? CPU usage?
GPU usage?

To init. my cards I use:

Code:

echo 5 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic
echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_oops
Xorg :0 &
sleep 5
export DISPLAY=:0
xset -dpms s off
/usr/bin/nvidia-settings -a GPUFanControlState=1
/usr/bin/nvidia-settings -a GPUTargetFanSpeed=100
/usr/bin/nvidia-settings -a GPUGraphicsClockOffset[3]=68
/usr/bin/nvidia-settings -a GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset[3]=684

nvidia-smi -i 0 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 1 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 2 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 3 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 4 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 5 -pl 245
nvidia-smi -i 6 -pl 245

xset -dpms s off

It uses an "Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4500 @ 3.50GHz", 8Gb Ram, ASRock H110 BTC etc. mainboard.

CPU usage 'mpstat -u 2', around 01:30:45 monit kicked in:

Code:

01:30:31 PM all 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.74
01:30:33 PM all 0.25 0.00 1.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.50
01:30:35 PM all 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.74
01:30:37 PM all 0.25 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.00
01:30:39 PM all 0.50 0.00 10.30 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88.94
01:30:41 PM all 0.25 0.00 1.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 97.99
01:30:43 PM all 2.28 0.00 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88.61
01:30:45 PM all 6.57 0.00 17.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.51
01:30:47 PM all 8.86 0.00 24.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.33
01:30:49 PM all 10.35 0.00 33.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.06
01:30:51 PM all 11.65 0.00 41.01 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.09

01:30:51 PM CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %guest %gnice %idle
01:30:53 PM all 11.93 0.00 46.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.12
01:30:55 PM all 10.55 0.00 49.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.20
01:30:57 PM all 12.03 0.00 55.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.58
01:30:59 PM all 9.09 0.00 58.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.83
01:31:01 PM all 8.33 0.00 57.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.09
01:31:03 PM all 7.30 0.00 57.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.01

GPU Usage 'nvidia-smi':

Code:

Startup: "screen -dmS flypool /opt/ramdrive/zm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --port 3333 --user t1SBXPFpggB4ynb6B3ybYU8dXYeM7qzpjer.RIG1 --pass d=32000 --temp-target 72"
EWBF uses same setting, different syntax.

garytheasshole

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 105

Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk

Quote from: dstm on September 22, 2017, 06:19:23 AM

Quote from: garytheasshole on September 22, 2017, 06:08:44 AM

Quote from: dstm on September 21, 2017, 11:21:33 AM

Quote from: garytheasshole on September 21, 2017, 10:47:16 AM

Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0

My early versions used 1.1.0, I had to downgrade to 1.0.0 because ubuntu still uses the old version. I don't really like to link it statically because of the security implications and licensing. It's pretty easy to compile 1.0.0 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH until ubuntu finally updates it's libraries. If there are any difficulties I might provide a version which is linked against openssl 1.1.0.

That's what I did man, but it's still not working

Code:

# ./zm
./zm: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
./zm: /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)

root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 ceп 21 14:32 /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> libcrypto.so.1.0.0i
[root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 ceп 21 14:32 /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> libssl.so.1.0.0i

I'll compile a new version against openssl 1.1.0 and pm it to you. I'll come up with a better solution later.

Much obliged

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: garytheasshole on September 22, 2017, 06:08:44 AM

Quote from: dstm on September 21, 2017, 11:21:33 AM

Quote from: garytheasshole on September 21, 2017, 10:47:16 AM

Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0

My early versions used 1.1.0, I had to downgrade to 1.0.0 because ubuntu still uses the old version. I don't really like to link it statically because of the security implications and licensing. It's pretty easy to compile 1.0.0 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH until ubuntu finally updates it's libraries. If there are any difficulties I might provide a version which is linked against openssl 1.1.0.

That's what I did man, but it's still not working

Code:

# ./zm
./zm: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
./zm: /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)

root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 ceп 21 14:32 /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> libcrypto.so.1.0.0i
[root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 ceп 21 14:32 /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> libssl.so.1.0.0i

I'll compile a new version against openssl 1.1.0 and pm it to you. I'll come up with a better solution later.

garytheasshole

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 105

Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk

Quote from: dstm on September 21, 2017, 11:21:33 AM

Quote from: garytheasshole on September 21, 2017, 10:47:16 AM

Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0

My early versions used 1.1.0, I had to downgrade to 1.0.0 because ubuntu still uses the old version. I don't really like to link it statically because of the security implications and licensing. It's pretty easy to compile 1.0.0 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH until ubuntu finally updates it's libraries. If there are any difficulties I might provide a version which is linked against openssl 1.1.0.

That's what I did man, but it's still not working

Code:

# ./zm
./zm: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
./zm: /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)

root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 ceп 21 14:32 /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> libcrypto.so.1.0.0i
[root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 ceп 21 14:32 /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> libssl.so.1.0.0i

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: ShowMeCoins on September 22, 2017, 02:40:51 AM

I just plugged in my 7th 1080ti and 'zm' doesn't seem to like it

Code:

---snippet---
GPU0 51°C Sol/s: 454.5 Sol/W: 2.43 Avg: 499.1 I/s: 245.3 Sh/s: 0.120 +
GPU1 56°C Sol/s: 451.2 Sol/W: 2.36 Avg: 489.5 I/s: 240.4 Sh/s: 0.060
GPU2 52°C Sol/s: 448.3 Sol/W: 2.52 Avg: 476.3 I/s: 237.7 Sh/s: 0.100 ++
GPU3 49°C Sol/s: 444.2 Sol/W: 2.43 Avg: 470.3 I/s: 236.7 Sh/s: 0.160 +
GPU4 52°C Sol/s: 450.3 Sol/W: 2.36 Avg: 467.3 I/s: 239.4 Sh/s: 0.080
GPU5 50°C Sol/s: 445.2 Sol/W: 2.45 Avg: 453.3 I/s: 236.9 Sh/s: 0.080 +
GPU6 48°C Sol/s: 442.5 Sol/W: 2.37 Avg: 442.6 I/s: 236.5 Sh/s: 0.040 +
========== Sol/s: 3136.2 Sol/W: 2.42 Avg: 3298.4 I/s: 1672.8 Sh/s: 0.640
---snippet---

Same setting, different miner (EWBF):

Code:

---snippet---
INFO 09:30:58: GPU4 Accepted share 26ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 09:30:59: GPU5 Accepted share 18ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 09:31:01: GPU5 Accepted share 30ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:03: GPU4 Accepted share 25ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:03: GPU4 Accepted share 19ms [A:4, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 49C GPU1: 53C GPU2: 49C GPU3: 46C GPU4: 49C GPU5: 47C GPU6: 46C
GPU0: 725 Sol/s GPU1: 751 Sol/s GPU2: 736 Sol/s GPU3: 746 Sol/s GPU4: 731 Sol/s GPU5: 730 Sol/s GPU6: 725 Sol/s
Total speed: 5144 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage | Efficiency |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| 0 | 244W | 2.97 Sol/W |
| 1 | 222W | 3.38 Sol/W |
| 2 | 224W | 3.29 Sol/W |
| 3 | 248W | 3.01 Sol/W |
| 4 | 215W | 3.40 Sol/W |
| 5 | 240W | 3.04 Sol/W |
| 6 | 244W | 2.97 Sol/W |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
INFO 09:31:06: GPU3 Accepted share 24ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:09: GPU2 Accepted share 25ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 09:31:16: GPU1 Accepted share 80ms [A:4, R:0]
INFO 09:31:17: GPU5 Accepted share 16ms [A:4, R:0]
---snippet---

Could you please provide more information?

How did you start zm? (parameters)
What CPU are you on? CPU usage?
GPU usage?

ShowMeCoins

member

Activity: 129

Merit: 11

I just plugged in my 7th 1080ti and 'zm' doesn't seem to like it

Code:

---snippet---
GPU0 51°C Sol/s: 454.5 Sol/W: 2.43 Avg: 499.1 I/s: 245.3 Sh/s: 0.120 +
GPU1 56°C Sol/s: 451.2 Sol/W: 2.36 Avg: 489.5 I/s: 240.4 Sh/s: 0.060
GPU2 52°C Sol/s: 448.3 Sol/W: 2.52 Avg: 476.3 I/s: 237.7 Sh/s: 0.100 ++
GPU3 49°C Sol/s: 444.2 Sol/W: 2.43 Avg: 470.3 I/s: 236.7 Sh/s: 0.160 +
GPU4 52°C Sol/s: 450.3 Sol/W: 2.36 Avg: 467.3 I/s: 239.4 Sh/s: 0.080
GPU5 50°C Sol/s: 445.2 Sol/W: 2.45 Avg: 453.3 I/s: 236.9 Sh/s: 0.080 +
GPU6 48°C Sol/s: 442.5 Sol/W: 2.37 Avg: 442.6 I/s: 236.5 Sh/s: 0.040 +
========== Sol/s: 3136.2 Sol/W: 2.42 Avg: 3298.4 I/s: 1672.8 Sh/s: 0.640
---snippet---

Same setting, different miner (EWBF):

Code:

---snippet---
INFO 09:30:58: GPU4 Accepted share 26ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 09:30:59: GPU5 Accepted share 18ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 09:31:01: GPU5 Accepted share 30ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:03: GPU4 Accepted share 25ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:03: GPU4 Accepted share 19ms [A:4, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 49C GPU1: 53C GPU2: 49C GPU3: 46C GPU4: 49C GPU5: 47C GPU6: 46C
GPU0: 725 Sol/s GPU1: 751 Sol/s GPU2: 736 Sol/s GPU3: 746 Sol/s GPU4: 731 Sol/s GPU5: 730 Sol/s GPU6: 725 Sol/s
Total speed: 5144 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage | Efficiency |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| 0 | 244W | 2.97 Sol/W |
| 1 | 222W | 3.38 Sol/W |
| 2 | 224W | 3.29 Sol/W |
| 3 | 248W | 3.01 Sol/W |
| 4 | 215W | 3.40 Sol/W |
| 5 | 240W | 3.04 Sol/W |
| 6 | 244W | 2.97 Sol/W |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
INFO 09:31:06: GPU3 Accepted share 24ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:09: GPU2 Accepted share 25ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 09:31:16: GPU1 Accepted share 80ms [A:4, R:0]
INFO 09:31:17: GPU5 Accepted share 16ms [A:4, R:0]
---snippet---

Nokia555

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 266

EthMonitoring.com

Quote from: dstm on September 21, 2017, 11:55:21 AM

Quote from: Nokia555 on September 21, 2017, 11:39:15 AM

Can i include linux version with EthControl Linux when it's done? (https://ethmonitoring.com/site/eth-control)

Yes

Quote

Also windows version, when you release it. Is there API support coming?

Windows, I'll start working on it soon. API, do you mean something like RPC to get stats? If this is something that people would like to have I'll implement it.

API for stats info yes, to get GPU temps, fan speeds, hashrates for remote monitoring. I can help you with that, if you have any questions let me know.

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: Nokia555 on September 21, 2017, 11:39:15 AM

Can i include linux version with EthControl Linux when it's done? (https://ethmonitoring.com/site/eth-control)

Yes

Quote

Also windows version, when you release it. Is there API support coming?

Windows, I'll start working on it soon. API, do you mean something like RPC to get stats? If this is something that people would like to have I'll implement it.

Nokia555

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 266

EthMonitoring.com

Can i include linux version with EthControl Linux when it's done? (https://ethmonitoring.com/site/eth-control)

Also windows version, when you release it. Is there API support coming?

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: garytheasshole on September 21, 2017, 10:47:16 AM

Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0

My early versions used 1.1.0, I had to downgrade to 1.0.0 because ubuntu still uses the old version. I don't really like to link it statically because of the security implications and licensing. It's pretty easy to compile 1.0.0 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH until ubuntu finally updates it's libraries. If there are any difficulties I might provide a version which is linked against openssl 1.1.0.

garytheasshole

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 105

Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk

Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0

dstm

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 126

Quote from: MarketGamer on September 20, 2017, 11:33:13 PM

Running 0.4.4 for about 5 hours now, so far so good.

Is there a reason the GPUs slowly change order in the output, can they be fixed in place instead so always output in order 0,1,2,3.... etc.?

The GPU that finishes first prints it's output first, they are all independent. So you're able to see how things actually behave on your system. This can be changed if it's important.

MarketGamer

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Running 0.4.4 for about 5 hours now, so far so good.

Is there a reason the GPUs slowly change order in the output, can they be fixed in place instead so always output in order 0,1,2,3.... etc.?

tazmako

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

XDNA - Most innovative cryptocurrency in 2018

wait for windows version too.

Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 160. (Read 224961 times)