Sorry noobs here. Can you run this in Zen cash instead of zcash? Thank you
Sure you can, it's the same algo!
Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows) - page 52. (Read 224961 times)
January 24, 2018, 01:31:56 AM
Sure you can, it's the same algo!
January 23, 2018, 11:26:32 PM
I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?
I have the same problem. With time, the miner just gets slower and slower... as if some lint was accumulating...but no errors are displayed, so I am blind to what's going on inside.P.S.
Running 7x Nvidia 1080Ti, no overclocking, fans at 100%, temperatures no more than 63ºC
All of you with slow miners.. have you installed Visual C++ runtime library? (from the Readme?),.. and how much ram do you have. My miner with dstm runs great.
January 23, 2018, 08:13:58 PM
I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?
I have the same problem. With time, the miner just gets slower and slower... as if some lint was accumulating...but no errors are displayed, so I am blind to what's going on inside.P.S.
Running 7x Nvidia 1080Ti, no overclocking, fans at 100%, temperatures no more than 63ºC
January 23, 2018, 08:03:25 PM
I tried switching from ewbf to dstm for the 2nd time yesterday. Initially it started out 5-10% faster than ewbf which is awesome, however after about 10-15 minutes it slowed more & more to the point where it was as much as 40% slower than ewbf, at which point I switched back.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.
I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?
Yep same motherboard, never had this issue with any other miner but I'd love to get it working & get the extra sols. Anyone else have any ideas?
January 23, 2018, 07:17:59 PM
I tried switching from ewbf to dstm for the 2nd time yesterday. Initially it started out 5-10% faster than ewbf which is awesome, however after about 10-15 minutes it slowed more & more to the point where it was as much as 40% slower than ewbf, at which point I switched back.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.
I have the same problem with DSTM 0.5.6, 0.5.7 and 0.5.8. Stable and fast as hell, but after one hour it starts to make less and less sol/s.. in three hours I'm getting half rate (I start with 680-700 sol/s and after 4 hours I end with 230 sol/s)... so my only solution is restart the miner. All the time no more than 60ºC, fan speed at 60%. I have two rigs, same specs and the same problem: Asrock H110 PRO + 13 Nvidia 1080Ti (up five different brands, mixed). Every rig have 4 PSUs: 3 x 1000W + 1 x 1600W and just one cable to power every riser (4 pin molex version) so no problems about power or temperature. I use simplemining without overclock, just power at 200W, no extra mhz in gpu core or memory. Is it a configuration problem?
January 23, 2018, 05:41:35 PM
I tried switching from ewbf to dstm for the 2nd time yesterday. Initially it started out 5-10% faster than ewbf which is awesome, however after about 10-15 minutes it slowed more & more to the point where it was as much as 40% slower than ewbf, at which point I switched back.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.
I've talked to others that do not have the same problem, yet they were running less GPUs than I am. I have multiple rigs with 13x1070s & 1070tis.
January 23, 2018, 05:08:07 PM
anyone knows what is best mining pool for ZEN? Most profitable?
January 23, 2018, 03:00:38 PM
Charging 2% here from all profits is just ridiculous , this guy is making millions monthly yet he hides behind anonymity and brilliant "customer service" (yes, you are paying him).
This pretty much.
Here its a working program for fee remove
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dstm-found-a-fee-remover-for-dstm-zm-miner-2800586
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dstm-found-a-fee-remover-for-dstm-zm-miner-2800586
I DO hope you can get it working under Windows 10. Cheers
Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner???
Yes, standard 1080 FE, running 0.9V(85% TDP), can get ez 2000MHz, but doing 1974MHz, watercooled, keeping it at about 37C, XOC bios(may affect sols in a negative way), +550 on mems.
Doing 570Sols with EKWB. DSTM is not good for GDDR5X cards(1080, 1080Ti).
If you can do 570 with EKWB with 0 fee, why would u do 570 x 0.98 (2% fee)= 558.6 with DSTM? Doesnt make sense.
January 23, 2018, 12:15:18 PM
Hi, DSTM.
Recv 10054 is a network, I think I fix it.
Now 10053 visits me (but its very rare). Is this a network problem too?
Send timeout is network too? (I changed WiFi adapter from noname to HighPower Tplink and dont see send timeout for a couple of days)
2018-01-22 19:11:54|# recv failed: 10053
2018-01-22 19:11:54|# reconnecting
2018-01-22 19:12:07|# connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
2018-01-22 19:12:10|# server set difficulty to: 0004189374bc6a7ef9db22d0...
2018-01-22 19:12:34|> GPU0 62C Sol/s: 332.8 Sol/W: 2.95 Avg: 332.8 I/s: 178.5 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:35|> GPU2 61C Sol/s: 301.2 Sol/W: 3.60 Avg: 301.2 I/s: 163.4 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:36|> GPU1 58C Sol/s: 293.9 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 293.9 I/s: 159.3 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:36|> GPU3 57C Sol/s: 316.3 Sol/W: 3.51 Avg: 316.3 I/s: 167.9 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:38|> GPU4 60C Sol/s: 335.4 Sol/W: 3.63 Avg: 335.4 I/s: 180.0 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:40|> GPU5 62C Sol/s: 296.2 Sol/W: 3.27 Avg: 296.2 I/s: 162.8 Sh: 2.99 . . +
2018-01-22 19:12:40| ========== Sol/s: 1875.8 Sol/W: 3.40 Avg: 1875.8 I/s: 1011.8 Sh: 2.99 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:45|# send timeout
2018-01-22 19:12:54| GPU0 63C Sol/s: 332.2 Sol/W: 2.94 Avg: 332.5 I/s: 176.8 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:55| GPU2 61C Sol/s: 302.7 Sol/W: 3.49 Avg: 302.0 I/s: 160.9 Sh: 1.49 . . +
2018-01-22 19:12:55|# send timeout
2018-01-22 19:12:56|# send timeout
2018-01-22 19:12:56| GPU1 61C Sol/s: 291.8 Sol/W: 3.42 Avg: 292.9 I/s: 156.7 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:56| GPU3 58C Sol/s: 309.3 Sol/W: 3.49 Avg: 312.8 I/s: 165.8 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:58| GPU4 60C Sol/s: 339.4 Sol/W: 3.53 Avg: 337.4 I/s: 177.5 Sh: 1.50 . . +
2018-01-22 19:13:00| GPU5 63C Sol/s: 289.6 Sol/W: 3.19 Avg: 292.9 I/s: 161.0 Sh: 5.98 . . +++
2018-01-22 19:13:00| ========== Sol/s: 1865.0 Sol/W: 3.34 Avg: 1870.4 I/s: 998.5 Sh: 8.97 . .
2018-01-22 19:13:08|# send timeout
2018-01-22 19:13:14| GPU0 63C Sol/s: 327.1 Sol/W: 2.92 Avg: 330.7 I/s: 176.5 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:13:15| GPU2 61C Sol/s: 298.5 Sol/W: 3.44 Avg: 300.8 I/s: 159.9 Sh: 1.99 . . +
2018-01-22 19:13:16|# send timeout
2018-01-22 19:13:16| GPU1 61C Sol/s: 293.8 Sol/W: 3.41 Avg: 293.2 I/s: 156.1 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:13:16| GPU3 59C Sol/s: 319.4 Sol/W: 3.51 Avg: 315.0 I/s: 165.4 Sh: 0.00 . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
========== Sol/s: 1882.1 Sol/W: 3.31 Avg: 1864.7 I/s: 1005.4 Sh: 6.80 0.99 100
2018-01-23 19:52:16| GPU2 61C Sol/s: 301.5 Sol/W: 3.33 Avg: 300.9 I/s: 163.1 Sh: 1.07 0.99 94
2018-01-23 19:52:16| GPU3 59C Sol/s: 321.4 Sol/W: 3.51 Avg: 309.2 I/s: 168.6 Sh: 1.16 0.99 78
2018-01-23 19:52:16| GPU0 63C Sol/s: 327.6 Sol/W: 3.04 Avg: 328.6 I/s: 176.5 Sh: 1.17 0.99 183
2018-01-23 19:52:28|cudaMemcpy 2 failed
This is an overclocking problem, I think? But what GPU? The numeration is similar to 0123?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And thew last question. My First rig running on a 0.5.7 and has a brilliant lost shares (0.6%)
uptime: 1 days 14:14:29
contime: 1 days 14:14:26
version: zm 0.5.7
server: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ID DEVICE NAME °C ∅ SOL/S ∅ SOL/W ∅ WATT SHARES LAT
0 GeForce GTX 1070 58 478.96 3.37 142.23 3962 / 26 78
1 GeForce GTX 1070 58 470.71 3.31 142.18 3917 / 26 78
2 GeForce GTX 1070 58 467.81 3.30 141.56 3911 / 30 78
3 GeForce GTX 1070 59 460.86 3.24 142.21 3843 / 30 78
4 GeForce GTX 1070 60 471.97 3.69 127.96 3979 / 22 78
Total - 2350.32 3.38 696.13 19612 / 134 78
The second rig running on a 0.5.8 and has more than a 1 percent of lost shares, I change on 0.5.7 and will see (for now less than 1 percent).
Thanks.
Recv 10054 is a network, I think I fix it.
Now 10053 visits me (but its very rare). Is this a network problem too?
Send timeout is network too? (I changed WiFi adapter from noname to HighPower Tplink and dont see send timeout for a couple of days)
2018-01-22 19:11:54|# recv failed: 10053
2018-01-22 19:11:54|# reconnecting
2018-01-22 19:12:07|# connected to: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
2018-01-22 19:12:10|# server set difficulty to: 0004189374bc6a7ef9db22d0...
2018-01-22 19:12:34|> GPU0 62C Sol/s: 332.8 Sol/W: 2.95 Avg: 332.8 I/s: 178.5 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:35|> GPU2 61C Sol/s: 301.2 Sol/W: 3.60 Avg: 301.2 I/s: 163.4 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:36|> GPU1 58C Sol/s: 293.9 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 293.9 I/s: 159.3 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:36|> GPU3 57C Sol/s: 316.3 Sol/W: 3.51 Avg: 316.3 I/s: 167.9 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:38|> GPU4 60C Sol/s: 335.4 Sol/W: 3.63 Avg: 335.4 I/s: 180.0 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:40|> GPU5 62C Sol/s: 296.2 Sol/W: 3.27 Avg: 296.2 I/s: 162.8 Sh: 2.99 . . +
2018-01-22 19:12:40| ========== Sol/s: 1875.8 Sol/W: 3.40 Avg: 1875.8 I/s: 1011.8 Sh: 2.99 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:45|# send timeout
2018-01-22 19:12:54| GPU0 63C Sol/s: 332.2 Sol/W: 2.94 Avg: 332.5 I/s: 176.8 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:55| GPU2 61C Sol/s: 302.7 Sol/W: 3.49 Avg: 302.0 I/s: 160.9 Sh: 1.49 . . +
2018-01-22 19:12:55|# send timeout
2018-01-22 19:12:56|# send timeout
2018-01-22 19:12:56| GPU1 61C Sol/s: 291.8 Sol/W: 3.42 Avg: 292.9 I/s: 156.7 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:56| GPU3 58C Sol/s: 309.3 Sol/W: 3.49 Avg: 312.8 I/s: 165.8 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:12:58| GPU4 60C Sol/s: 339.4 Sol/W: 3.53 Avg: 337.4 I/s: 177.5 Sh: 1.50 . . +
2018-01-22 19:13:00| GPU5 63C Sol/s: 289.6 Sol/W: 3.19 Avg: 292.9 I/s: 161.0 Sh: 5.98 . . +++
2018-01-22 19:13:00| ========== Sol/s: 1865.0 Sol/W: 3.34 Avg: 1870.4 I/s: 998.5 Sh: 8.97 . .
2018-01-22 19:13:08|# send timeout
2018-01-22 19:13:14| GPU0 63C Sol/s: 327.1 Sol/W: 2.92 Avg: 330.7 I/s: 176.5 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:13:15| GPU2 61C Sol/s: 298.5 Sol/W: 3.44 Avg: 300.8 I/s: 159.9 Sh: 1.99 . . +
2018-01-22 19:13:16|# send timeout
2018-01-22 19:13:16| GPU1 61C Sol/s: 293.8 Sol/W: 3.41 Avg: 293.2 I/s: 156.1 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-01-22 19:13:16| GPU3 59C Sol/s: 319.4 Sol/W: 3.51 Avg: 315.0 I/s: 165.4 Sh: 0.00 . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
========== Sol/s: 1882.1 Sol/W: 3.31 Avg: 1864.7 I/s: 1005.4 Sh: 6.80 0.99 100
2018-01-23 19:52:16| GPU2 61C Sol/s: 301.5 Sol/W: 3.33 Avg: 300.9 I/s: 163.1 Sh: 1.07 0.99 94
2018-01-23 19:52:16| GPU3 59C Sol/s: 321.4 Sol/W: 3.51 Avg: 309.2 I/s: 168.6 Sh: 1.16 0.99 78
2018-01-23 19:52:16| GPU0 63C Sol/s: 327.6 Sol/W: 3.04 Avg: 328.6 I/s: 176.5 Sh: 1.17 0.99 183
2018-01-23 19:52:28|cudaMemcpy 2 failed
This is an overclocking problem, I think? But what GPU? The numeration is similar to 0123?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And thew last question. My First rig running on a 0.5.7 and has a brilliant lost shares (0.6%)
uptime: 1 days 14:14:29
contime: 1 days 14:14:26
version: zm 0.5.7
server: eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ID DEVICE NAME °C ∅ SOL/S ∅ SOL/W ∅ WATT SHARES LAT
0 GeForce GTX 1070 58 478.96 3.37 142.23 3962 / 26 78
1 GeForce GTX 1070 58 470.71 3.31 142.18 3917 / 26 78
2 GeForce GTX 1070 58 467.81 3.30 141.56 3911 / 30 78
3 GeForce GTX 1070 59 460.86 3.24 142.21 3843 / 30 78
4 GeForce GTX 1070 60 471.97 3.69 127.96 3979 / 22 78
Total - 2350.32 3.38 696.13 19612 / 134 78
The second rig running on a 0.5.8 and has more than a 1 percent of lost shares, I change on 0.5.7 and will see (for now less than 1 percent).
Thanks.
January 23, 2018, 09:29:10 AM
Hi guys! I have a question regarding MSI 1060 6gb Gaming X. Whenever I set my Power Limit(watt) on my MSI 1060 6gb on SMOS using dstm v0.5.7, It always shows "applying limit for GPU1 100" even though I set it to 60w on smos. My 1070 and 1080Ti works fine with the power limit and show on the screen the limit I applied to it....
SMOS OC setting on dstm v0.5.7 https://imgur.com/a/XIf7l
GPU0:1080Ti
GPU1,2: 1060 6G https://imgur.com/a/topF9
GPU3: 1070
I have been searching through reddit but can't find anything regarding this issue.
SMOS OC setting on dstm v0.5.7 https://imgur.com/a/XIf7l
GPU0:1080Ti
GPU1,2: 1060 6G https://imgur.com/a/topF9
GPU3: 1070
I have been searching through reddit but can't find anything regarding this issue.
January 23, 2018, 08:54:02 AM
Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner???
I have a rig of 8x 1080 (non-ti), they are Gigabyte GTX 1080 WINDFORCE OC. On average I would say they run in the 560's and 570's. I have seen them as low as 550's and as high as 590.
Currently: 581 576 576 573 580 576 569 576
January 23, 2018, 08:14:23 AM
As I try to run it suprnova in zen cash it gives me "the code execution cannot proceed because VCRUNTIME140.ddl was not found. Reinstalling the program may fix this problem.... I am running win 10. Thank you and sorry for the trouble
Did you even do a google search on the missing dll (not ddl)? If you had you would have learned that it is component of the Visual C++ runtime library which can be downloaded from here:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2977003/the-latest-supported-visual-c-downloads
January 23, 2018, 07:01:34 AM
As I try to run it suprnova in zen cash it gives me "the code execution cannot proceed because VCRUNTIME140.ddl was not found. Reinstalling the program may fix this problem.... I am running win 10. Thank you and sorry for the trouble
January 23, 2018, 06:49:45 AM
Sorry noobs here. Can you run this in Zen cash instead of zcash? Thank you
You can use it for any equihash coin January 23, 2018, 06:46:20 AM
Sorry noobs here. Can you run this in Zen cash instead of zcash? Thank you
I know you can do it with EWFB... not sure about this one but it's just a matter of change the pool and try it! January 23, 2018, 06:45:28 AM
Sorry noobs here. Can you run this in Zen cash instead of zcash? Thank you
January 23, 2018, 04:47:56 AM
Just a feature request... would be great to get coloured output so it's easier to read 
January 23, 2018, 03:46:23 AM
May i know the formula of 2% dev-fee.
Is sol/s *0.98 or etc.
Someone can tell me. Thanks!
Is sol/s *0.98 or etc.
Someone can tell me. Thanks!
January 23, 2018, 02:28:17 AM
Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner???
6xGigabyte 1080 auorus, very slight OC 1900/4950 GPU/MEM 70% limit
January 23, 2018, 02:25:17 AM
Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner???
A wide range, but my MSI Gaming X gives 590-600 on 100%, +120/+300 Jump to: