A not qualified dev?
More info, please.
Topic: [ANN] Ducats - Money without banks - page 9. (Read 21632 times)
I've tried to adapt Neisklar's https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin to Ducats using this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=214512.0;all and come up with the following patch: http://0x0a.nl:35858/static/p2p.quarktoducats.patch .. A couple of things I'm sure are off. At the very least the SUBSIDY_FUNC is entirely wrong. I tried to verify functionality by running in testnet mode, but the Ducats testnet didn't seem to exist (or I messed up).
Long story slightly shorter, I'm running an extremely experimental p2pool at http://0x0a.nl:35858 (0.9% fee) of which I'm not sure it works at all. It is accepting shares though, so it's not broken 100%
. It's certainly a better idea to wait till someone knowledgeable like rav3n_pl comes to the rescue, but if you can't wait and you don't mind to risk losing a lot of time and energy .. you're welcome to join my pool 
!
And if you want to run your own p2pool based on my changes, you can do the following:
Long story slightly shorter, I'm running an extremely experimental p2pool at http://0x0a.nl:35858 (0.9% fee) of which I'm not sure it works at all. It is accepting shares though, so it's not broken 100%
. It's certainly a better idea to wait till someone knowledgeable like rav3n_pl comes to the rescue, but if you can't wait and you don't mind to risk losing a lot of time and energy .. you're welcome to join my pool !And if you want to run your own p2pool based on my changes, you can do the following:
Code:
git clone https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin
cd p2pool-quarkcoin
wget http://0x0a.nl:35858/static/p2p.quarktoducats.patch
patch -p1 < p2p.quarktoducats.patch
Thank you for the effort 0btc. If everything is running smoothly I will add a link in the first post.
I have also restarted my testnet client. Please let me know if you are able to connect.
There we go. 32 cores of azure VPS (~2800 khs) coming towards the pool.
Let's see if it moves now, before my azure trial expires.
Let's see if it moves now, before my azure trial expires.
I see now. it says estimated time to next block 155 hours.
Well, let's hope some more miners join us.
For now I can confirm that I can connect and that the shares are submited.
Well, let's hope some more miners join us.
For now I can confirm that I can connect and that the shares are submited.
I'm testing your pool.
..
I'm getting some yay's. I'll run for 10-15 minutes to see if it pays.
I'll let you know if it pays
Ha, welcome
! Sadly though, payments will only happen when the p2pool network finds a block, and right now, my server is the only p2pool node in existence for this network (unless someone else has patched p2pool as described above and used the same IDENTIFIER and PREFIX hex values) - and of that only p2pool node, we two are the only miners. That means that the two of us only get paid out when either of us finds a block.. If other people start joining the p2pool network, blocks will get found much faster, as will the payouts. (A block found while you have an active share = instant payout) - which is the strength of p2pool. Until then, nothing much happens! Thanks for testing though I've tried to adapt Neisklar's https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin to Ducats using this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=214512.0;all and come up with the following patch: http://0x0a.nl:35858/static/p2p.quarktoducats.patch .. A couple of things I'm sure are off. At the very least the SUBSIDY_FUNC is entirely wrong. I tried to verify functionality by running in testnet mode, but the Ducats testnet didn't seem to exist (or I messed up).
Long story slightly shorter, I'm running an extremely experimental p2pool at http://0x0a.nl:35858 (0.9% fee) of which I'm not sure it works at all. It is accepting shares though, so it's not broken 100%. It's certainly a better idea to wait till someone knowledgeable like rav3n_pl comes to the rescue, but if you can't wait and you don't mind to risk losing a lot of time and energy .. you're welcome to join my pool !
And if you want to run your own p2pool based on my changes, you can do the following:
Long story slightly shorter, I'm running an extremely experimental p2pool at http://0x0a.nl:35858 (0.9% fee) of which I'm not sure it works at all. It is accepting shares though, so it's not broken 100%
. It's certainly a better idea to wait till someone knowledgeable like rav3n_pl comes to the rescue, but if you can't wait and you don't mind to risk losing a lot of time and energy .. you're welcome to join my pool !And if you want to run your own p2pool based on my changes, you can do the following:
Code:
git clone https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin
cd p2pool-quarkcoin
wget http://0x0a.nl:35858/static/p2p.quarktoducats.patch
patch -p1 < p2p.quarktoducats.patch
I'm testing your pool.
I'm running the optimized cpu quark miner with the command:
Code:
minerd.exe -a quark --url stratum+tcp://0x0a.nl:35858 -u 631obYuQUiU5pVrrMM8RFt2MbRaRn52F9n -p x
I'm getting some yay's.
Now lets run for 10-15 minutes to see if it pays.
Code:
[2014-01-17 22:03:39] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://0x0a.nl:35858
[2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2014-01-17 22:03:39] 6 miner threads started, using 'quark' algorithm.
[2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
[2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
[2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2014-01-17 22:03:39] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2014-01-17 22:03:39] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-17 22:03:39] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 4: 696536 hashes, 114.00 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:03:46] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 5: 739053 hashes, 119.07 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 3: 744899 hashes, 120.99 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 1: 744744 hashes, 121.73 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 0: 709755 hashes, 114.35 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:03:46] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 590.15 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 4: 7806 hashes, 121.95 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:03:46] thread 2: 746594 hashes, 120.31 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 3: 2039318 hashes, 117.96 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:03] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 4: 2135245 hashes, 123.05 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 0: 2000537 hashes, 115.28 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 1: 2089044 hashes, 120.38 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 3: 7911 hashes, 121.69 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:03] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 719.77 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 2: 2098518 hashes, 120.94 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:03] thread 5: 2125358 hashes, 122.47 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:06] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 3: 247556 hashes, 113.75 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 5: 265222 hashes, 121.98 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 2: 263142 hashes, 120.97 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 0: 265677 hashes, 122.02 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 1: 262832 hashes, 120.72 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:06] thread 4: 268708 hashes, 123.41 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 2: 4565563 hashes, 119.00 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:44] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 3: 4595685 hashes, 119.59 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 5: 4557893 hashes, 118.61 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 0: 4674615 hashes, 121.65 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:44] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 722.97 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 2: 7817 hashes, 122.13 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 4: 4654783 hashes, 121.14 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:04:44] thread 1: 4334985 hashes, 112.82 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:05:09] thread 4: 2990085 hashes, 118.66 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:05:09] Stratum detected new block
[2014-01-17 22:05:09] thread 5: 2968015 hashes, 117.48 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:05:09] thread 3: 2980882 hashes, 117.99 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:05:09] thread 2: 2949748 hashes, 116.76 khash/s
[2014-01-17 22:05:09] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 705.35 khash/s (yay!!!)
I've tried to adapt Neisklar's https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin to Ducats using this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=214512.0;all and come up with the following patch: http://0x0a.nl:35858/static/p2p.quarktoducats.patch .. A couple of things I'm sure are off. At the very least the SUBSIDY_FUNC is entirely wrong. I tried to verify functionality by running in testnet mode, but the Ducats testnet didn't seem to exist (or I messed up).
Long story slightly shorter, I'm running an extremely experimental p2pool at http://0x0a.nl:35858 (0.9% fee) of which I'm not sure it works at all. It is accepting shares though, so it's not broken 100%. It's certainly a better idea to wait till someone knowledgeable like rav3n_pl comes to the rescue, but if you can't wait and you don't mind to risk losing a lot of time and energy .. you're welcome to join my pool !
And if you want to run your own p2pool based on my changes, you can do the following:
Long story slightly shorter, I'm running an extremely experimental p2pool at http://0x0a.nl:35858 (0.9% fee) of which I'm not sure it works at all. It is accepting shares though, so it's not broken 100%
. It's certainly a better idea to wait till someone knowledgeable like rav3n_pl comes to the rescue, but if you can't wait and you don't mind to risk losing a lot of time and energy .. you're welcome to join my pool !And if you want to run your own p2pool based on my changes, you can do the following:
Code:
git clone https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin
cd p2pool-quarkcoin
wget http://0x0a.nl:35858/static/p2p.quarktoducats.patch
patch -p1 < p2p.quarktoducats.patch
cpu coins become useless. such difficulty in a few hours is outrageous.
{
"blocks" : 336,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 2366.15324099,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : 3,
"hashespersec" : 49199,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
"blocks" : 336,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 2366.15324099,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : 3,
"hashespersec" : 49199,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
So is this a quark clone? Won't bother with it if it is.
The algoritme is equal to Quark but coin distribution is totally different and more like Peercoin.
So is this a quark clone? Won't bother with it if it is.
{
"blocks" : 308,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 835.73765216,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
"blocks" : 308,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 835.73765216,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
634D3YoNZeZK1ZPatr5etSgjh1zdxPKLn3
cpu is sputtering, and coughing I think...
cpu is sputtering, and coughing I think...
no chance with my cpu ^(
5stFnqVvWNBX7mKaEp214N3XLRXwFJRE8X
thx
5stFnqVvWNBX7mKaEp214N3XLRXwFJRE8X
thx
In the treasury)
5yvaa9FSm6zWcnoaGQSLSZqnAzmcBZ6p6v
p2pool, please.
no chance with my cpu ^(
64EZiTZCemZK9a67aM5ve5oDDNTQGcBE5t
64EZiTZCemZK9a67aM5ve5oDDNTQGcBE5t
need pool, no pool is not fair with cpu 
Code:
./init.cpp: " -port=" + _("Listen for connections on (default: 25858 or testnet: 25859)") + "\n" +
./init.cpp: " -bind=" + _("Bind to given address and always listen on it. Use [host]:port notation for IPv6") + "\n" +
./init.cpp: " -upnp " + _("Use UPnP to map the listening port (default: 1 when listening)") + "\n" +
./init.cpp: " -upnp " + _("Use UPnP to map the listening port (default: 0)") + "\n" +
./init.cpp: " -rpcport=" + _("Listen for JSON-RPC connections on (default: 25858 or testnet: 25859)") + "\n" +
Good catch. This was only cosmetic. As you can see in protocol.h the port being used is 25856 which has now been updated in init.cpp.
I appreciate the reply, I'll change how I search for ports going forward!
lol
most of coin belongs to DEV
anybody got coin? check it.
and please check the source code , how many coin in first 200 block
most of coin belongs to DEV
anybody got coin? check it.
and please check the source code , how many coin in first 200 block
My laptop is not finding blocks with this difficulty either. We are aiming to get a pool started within 24 hours.
Jump to: