Topic: [ANN] eMunie (EMU) - NOT a BitCoin fork/clone - call for beta testers - page 31. (Read 78405 times)
May 30, 2013, 05:29:43 PM
I would like to give it a test.
May 30, 2013, 05:29:26 PM
i am interested to be a tester.
May 30, 2013, 05:25:41 PM
im interested, if launched id like to open a pool aswell
May 30, 2013, 05:24:10 PM
I'll be a tester
May 30, 2013, 05:21:20 PM
I'm interested in a Beta spot. Is it open source?
I would like to test it too
May 30, 2013, 05:21:02 PM
Would like to test.
Question. If the primary hatcher selects his validator, whats to stop him from selecting a friend and gaming the system in some way?
Question. If the primary hatcher selects his validator, whats to stop him from selecting a friend and gaming the system in some way?
May 30, 2013, 05:13:40 PM
How are new "hatcher" nodes added post-beta?
Anyone can opt to be a hatcher, just as anyone can opt to mine BitCoin. It's just a toggle in your peer.
May 30, 2013, 05:13:17 PM
I would like to be a beta tester.
May 30, 2013, 05:12:46 PM
Ok so no limit in the number of EMU but as they are coming slow also not a problem
Will it possible in the future o change this or other key feature of the system like change the crypt algorithm or the time when new EMU will appear?
Will there a central system to take care on this or is community related
Like btc transactions from an old client may not accept by newer miners because of something so the community of miners can drive th direction of the development.
Will it possible in the future o change this or other key feature of the system like change the crypt algorithm or the time when new EMU will appear?
Will there a central system to take care on this or is community related
Like btc transactions from an old client may not accept by newer miners because of something so the community of miners can drive th direction of the development.
Ideally we would like to build a community just like the other successful currencies have, and push this forward as a whole if it can gain some traction.
Any suggestions for improvements etc etc would be met with honest consideration, hopefully as a community.
May 30, 2013, 05:10:16 PM
How are new "hatcher" nodes added post-beta?
May 30, 2013, 05:08:00 PM
I'll test, looks like you have the first 50 already though
70 or so posts, a bunch of replies and questions. Might be getting close to 50. He did also mention that as the beta expands it would be first in line would be next. I'm doubting that the entire beta would limited permanently to 50 people.
Indeed, the more people that pledge their support the better really, heavier testing load = better system, so we aren't capping at 50 or anything like that. We just don't want to overload it instantly and so plan to scale up over those initial 2 weeks.
May 30, 2013, 05:06:55 PM
May 30, 2013, 05:06:37 PM
As mentioned by com911, the name is only one letter shy of a muslim mullah. If hard set on keeping the name, change it to the common spelling, moola.
May 30, 2013, 05:04:40 PM
Most interesting is that there are really new ideas!
I understand that in your post (as you wrote) not all can be covered..
But some questions and not only want to ask "tester too, to be an early adapter."
one important (for me) will there a maximum of ENU in your system? I like also to think on one with a non maximum (differnet from bitcoin)..
Also the question if the hatching nodes need to go through all transactions until the first block, will this scale with a large list of transactions (i think in bitcoin, yes wehere we have the ~8 GB Blockchain now..)
I know that this is also need to test so
at least this sound interesting and let us see your effords soon
I understand that in your post (as you wrote) not all can be covered..
But some questions and not only want to ask "tester too, to be an early adapter."
one important (for me) will there a maximum of ENU in your system? I like also to think on one with a non maximum (differnet from bitcoin)..
Also the question if the hatching nodes need to go through all transactions until the first block, will this scale with a large list of transactions (i think in bitcoin, yes wehere we have the ~8 GB Blockchain now..)
I know that this is also need to test so
at least this sound interesting and let us see your effords soon
Thanks for the enthusiasm
There is no set cap target of EMU's, so in theory it's unlimited. We've opted for a simple 1 EMU per minute volume target (which will be voted on in hourly intervals, so 60 p/h) which gives a nice, steady yearly volume of around 520k EMU's. Each EMU can be subdivided just like BTC, so granularity isn't a problem.
To your verification question, the backward traversal of the chain will be quite quick, even with many millions of transactions in the system as there is only 1 path to get back to the genesis block. Forward traversal from the genesis block is more resource hungry as the ledger grows and we have some ideas to mitigate this over time. That said, as the ledger grows, the amount of work that a hatcher node has had to do to verify that transaction rises, so the proportion of the 80% share allocated to that hatcher will increase, thus they are paid for that work.
Ok so no limit in the number of EMU but as they are coming slow also not a problem
Will it possible in the future o change this or other key feature of the system like change the crypt algorithm or the time when new EMU will appear?
Will there a central system to take care on this or is community related
Like btc transactions from an old client may not accept by newer miners because of something so the community of miners can drive th direction of the development.
May 30, 2013, 05:04:11 PM
I would like help with beta testing.
May 30, 2013, 05:00:24 PM
I'd like to test if possible.
May 30, 2013, 04:59:56 PM
I'll test, looks like you have the first 50 already though
70 or so posts, a bunch of replies and questions. Might be getting close to 50. He did also mention that as the beta expands it would be first in line would be next. I'm doubting that the entire beta would limited permanently to 50 people.
May 30, 2013, 04:58:34 PM
This is excellent news. I'm in. When/where can we get access to the code? I look forward to thoroughly dissecting this thing.
May 30, 2013, 04:56:08 PM
I would test it too.
May 30, 2013, 04:53:32 PM
looks interesting
can help test
can help test
Jump to: