Topic: [ANN] [ETC] Ethereum Classic: Immutable Smart Contracts - page 442. (Read 821137 times)
Pumper tits is hiding LOL
Where's pumpy? 
He should wake up soon, I should get his number. This will make his head explode
Where's pumpy?
I sent etc to polo and they found eth someone accidentally sent me but better to use one of the tutorials on Reddit
6 hours
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/etc-ethereum-classic-the-rise-and-fall-1565824
Do not believe bitpop.
The only reason the fork happened was because the community as a whole decided to do it.
This would not happen when the FBI or whoever goes to Vitalik.
There has to be consensus, there has been consensus and there will be again.
The only popularity Ethereum Classic now has comes from its temporary monetary value. Which we will take before the devs get a chance to do so.
G.G
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/etc-ethereum-classic-the-rise-and-fall-1565824
Do not believe bitpop.
The only reason the fork happened was because the community as a whole decided to do it.
This would not happen when the FBI or whoever goes to Vitalik.
There has to be consensus, there has been consensus and there will be again.
The only popularity Ethereum Classic now has comes from its temporary monetary value. Which we will take before the devs get a chance to do so.
G.G
Can you elaborate on your ingenious plan? How does locking coins up help you? Can you sign a message with the address(es)?
my coins ethereum (ETH) are on the my wallet. How do I get new coins Ethereum Classic (ETC) ?
I have to move their coins ethereum (ETH) on polo and and I will be have Ethereum Classic (ETC)?
I have to move their coins ethereum (ETH) on polo and and I will be have Ethereum Classic (ETC)?
Some users have reported that if you send your old ETH to Poloniex ETH (not ETC!) deposit address they will replay it on the other chain and credit you both ETH and ETC.
I have NOT confirmed this so please use at your own risk. Perhaps send 1 ETH + fees first.
as per coinmarketcap:
Available supply of ETH: 82,359,361
Available supply of ETC: 82,297,453
What does the ~62k difference relate to? Shouldn't both numbers be identical?
Available supply of ETH: 82,359,361
Available supply of ETC: 82,297,453
What does the ~62k difference relate to? Shouldn't both numbers be identical?
The chains have been mined separately since the fork so no, they won't be identical.
What is going on in the Ethereum community? What are the miners saying? They will be the key to victory. The supporters of ETC must appeal to them to find it in their hearts to do the right thing.
Someone doens'nt want ETC on 300k sat. 
Bring ETH to the ground.
Bring ETH to the ground.
300k there it is 
What is the end result of ETC? So ETC is going to trump over ETH? Is this just a pump and dump, or is there real value with ETC? I wake up this morning and ETC is up 200% 
Immutable is the key and only point of crypto.
What is the end result of ETC? So ETC is going to trump over ETH? Is this just a pump and dump, or is there real value in ETC? I wake up this morning and ETC is up over 200%
Fbi asks vitalik to fork out rouleth? Centralized, forks, law. Other countries ask to fork out Jews or women. Then what? Immutable is the only thing that stands in their way. Its the only reason for crypto.
Why do you think coinbase, a bank, would love forks? Proforkers need to stick with lawyers, mysql and fiat.
Why do you think coinbase, a bank, would love forks? Proforkers need to stick with lawyers, mysql and fiat.
292k 300k easy
300k easy
If 300k wall be broken this etc going to other galaxy!
HAHA
thats will be a very nice!
HAHA
thats will be a very nice!
I just realized it's already possible to mine with latest Claymore on Suprnova's Nicehash Port..
./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1
Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...
./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1
Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...
Hmm, earlier there were some reports that "extranonce.subscribe disabled", when mining with claymore on nicehash, reduced speed.
Edit:
Gotta walk the dog.. but i can put some rigs to test with claymores.
Should i mine on the nicehash settings or regular?
Regular won't work, but Nicehash Mode should work fine.. (-esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1)
Seems ok.
I got this line on of the miners. But only once.. and its finding shares right after. So i guess its ok. Ill watch it for while to compare reported and actual hashrate.
ETH: Received error: {"id":4,"result":null,"error":[21,"jobnotfound"]}
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)!
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!
Check out this email from BitMex
http://us3.campaign-archive1.com/?u=db45c09bdf20e1866bb32123f&id=f15a87988e&e=0f6795f899
http://us3.campaign-archive1.com/?u=db45c09bdf20e1866bb32123f&id=f15a87988e&e=0f6795f899
LOL wow look at those polo charts go...."so natural" 
Thank you for supporting the right project.
Added
Thank you for supporting the right project.
Jump to: