What is the problem of POS? inflation?
That plus it's the definition of a ponzi. The top holders will get free tokens for life at the expense of new entrants and then constantly dump on new investors.
I don't think you know what a ponzi scheme is, then.
From Wikipedia: A Ponzi scheme (/ˈpɒn.zi/; also a Ponzi game)[1] is a fraudulent investment operation where the operator, an individual or organization, pays returns to its investors from new capital paid to the operators by new investors, rather than from profit earned through legitimate sources. Operators of Ponzi schemes usually entice new investors by offering higher returns than other investments, in the form of short-term returns that are either abnormally high or unusually consistent.
Given this actual definition of a ponzie scheme, how exactly is PoS implementation on a public blockchain a ponzi, and how does that make "Vitaly a criminal"?
Note: I'm not expecting bitpop to actually be able to answer this. Rarely, in the face of rational and logical reasoning, has he been able to say anything that amounts to more than just fud.
is a fraudulent investment operation where the operator, an individual or organization, pays returns to its investors from new capital paid to the operators by new investors, rather than from profit earned through legitimate sources. Operators of Ponzi schemes usually entice new investors by offering higher returns than other investments, in the form of short-term returns that are either abnormally high or unusually consistent.
Care to answer any of those questions I posed bitpop? Or all you can do is repeat what I said?
It's the definition of a ponzi, there are no questions. And vitaly owning a ponzi makes him a criminal.