Topic: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping - page 260. (Read 2115900 times)

Well, as soon as you get rid of your Napoleonic complex which gives you the power to label people as discredited I will unignore you. Feel free never to read any of my comments since I will DEFINITELY do the same for your BS. Good look with your Reddit transfer and I wish you all the best from the bottom of my heart.

Hi
l haven t touch my factoids from ico,has anybody transferred factoids by using 12 words that we had from koinify? l m trying to run factomd but keep crashing,any help would be appreciated.
Kind Regards

Tempus, once again Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping. Nice job man, 100% deserved.

IMO Crazyivan and Azael are more or less permanently discredited. Everyone's allowed a voice, but their BS has been going on way too long. If they contributed anything of meaningful value to this discussion, ever, it would be different, but they don't, so ... It's a shame. Imagine this discussion without these constant, noxious derailments. Seriously, there's no need for this ...

Reminder 1: It's possible to "Ignore" someone by clicking the "Ignore" button by their name.

Reminder 2: I'm personally going to try to move most of my original comments (as opposed to responses, which I'll still do here) to Reddit, in the hope that some of this noise is reduced. I also personally like the ability to have conversations divided by subject. Do whatever works best for you, but hope to see some of you there.  

Factom is awesome, big pump follows monero. You guys earn a lot of money, I envy. 

Children pls, you need to let other kids play with your toys as well. No need to attack each other, after all, all s nice and dandy in the Factomland, isn't it?

Bravo.  Very well done takedown.

You are such a sad clown. Like your previous accusations and lies about me this is also a mix-up of your inability to distinguish between your personal mental problems and what it should be about in this thread. But let's treat it as if you would say something legit:

"insults from a newbie account. That's another one of Tempus alt accounts."

Let's take a look at the dates registered:

myriadforce
Date Registered: March 01, 2014

tempus
Date Registered: August 07, 2014

Azael
Date Registered: May 08, 2016


- Who is the newbie, you newbie?
- And if myriadforce is "another one" of my accounts, why was he registered even before myself?
- And "another one of Tempus alt accounts."? You already tried to spread the lie I would be a Factom-sockpuppet but you did not say I would use more accounts if I'm right. Who else is me?



"irrational cheerleaders"


That's funny. Yes, I write 99% positive about Factom. Because it's a great project. But it's not cheerleading.


But you:

"Will EmerCoin pitch to Anchor into Factom blockchain after they do Ethereum?" --> In the EmerCoin-Thread

"Will Dash pitch to Anchor into Factom blockchain after they do Ethereum?" --> In the Dash-Thread

"Will Monero pitch to Anchor into Factom blockchain after they do Ethereum?" --> In the Monero-Thread

"Will Expanse pitch to Anchor into Factom blockchain after they do Ethereum?" --> In the Expanse-Thread

"Will Rise pitch to Anchor into Factom blockchain after they do Ethereum?" --> In the Rise-Thread

"Will Lisk pitch to Anchor into Factom blockchain after they do Ethereum?" --> In the Lisk-Thread

"Will Sia pitch to Anchor into Factom blockchain after they do Ethereum?"  --> In the SIA-Thread


And you spam your Factom-cheerleading around even more. The last posts of you after the above - both Factom-cheerleading in threads of other projects.

Take a look at your own posts: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/azael-838066


You believe that is rational?
You believe that is not cheerleading?



Conclusion:

1. You are the newbie and most likely it's not your first account.
2. You act irrational.
3. You are the cheerleader here.


So, please don't bore others and me with your bullshit.
 

really unhappy that bought just few coins some while ago

I smell a passive aggressive beta male posting insults from a newbie account. That's another one of Tempus alt accounts. Just ignore and refrain from quoting the irrational cheerleaders so I don't need to see this.

OK so the theory is, If they did something last year, they might do something (aka release M2) this year? Sorry if I'm being dense ...

Correct this was genesis. Just showing Sept 1st as being the 1 year anniversary.

I'm confused. The date on the article is 2015. Am I missing something?

Hm, nice price jump. If it is related to September 1, we re going to see price going up even more during the next 3 days.

Never heard of them, but Google its name with Factom and got this link https://coincheck.com/en/contents/coincheck-factom-exchange

That actually sounds like a really positive use of Factom. Why does it say September 1st? Edit: NV.

I've signed up for the Japanese exchange Coincheck, but can't seem to find where to trade FCT.  It doesn't seem to be live yet?  Or am I missing something?

/r/factom just reached 700 readers ... Historical growth here:

http://redditmetrics.com/r/factom

(click Total Subscribers)

Speculation that we may see milestone 2 on September 1st which is the anniversary of Factom. This would be a big party imo

http://www.coindesk.com/press-releases/factom-celebrates-genesis/

https://steemit.com/property/@yotdau/i-did-a-dissertation-on-real-estate-and-blockchain-s-potential-impacts-here-s-a-condensed-version

Following the announcement Factom stated that the collaboration with SmartContract.com was “to create integration where we can leverage the publishing functionality of Factom to enable smart contracts to self-verify their conditions have been met. Factom will act as an “Oracle”, the trusted source of knowledge and the conduit of that knowledge, a new term we are calling “Acolyte” ”.

Acolyte chain has been created now.

Acolyte   Identity Chain   1   2016-08-21   
da7aaeaae20d77e03e3ea57e90d9b46efc8fa187cb79836e046375033b7680aa
92
Identity Registration2
2   2016-08-21   
e00df2d1851d3232b807764ab7e48ff90dce52eadd9bde568c8f89321ecc6f78
93
Question Chain   1   2016-08-22   
da7ab0aa7b26a9d6da91253d4b0639453a4d12d84fa00ab9d0343c9e4f6ff594
94
Oracle Registration Chain
1   2016-08-22   
da7ac1717e0b2e0c4609cdc2c78289e841239d2779fd23632ab226510184aae4