Topic: [ANN] [GDGC] GadgetCoin | IoT | M2M |Smart Contracts on Hardware - page 16. (Read 88491 times)

It was explained many times in the last few weeks that in step one, in order to serve Flash clients and to start the service soon as it is possible, the jizzmo and streemo sites would have to use a hybrid model utilizing RTMP nodes. Streaming live is quite different than streaming video on-demand using RTMP servers.


Thank you! We also wish you find the coin, community and developers which meet your expectations!

you can compete with IBM, but it is very hard to compete with the stupidity of the Paycoin shill.

One last time I'll contribute to keep this in the front page. Amazing that you would have such low level of comprehension and even tech knowledge? Let me put it to you in bold so you GET IT: As far as peer to peer transmission is concerned, there's NO DIFFERENCE, between live video streaming and video on demand. Get that or should I repeat it?
The original video, be it live or previously recorded, still has to be encoded just the same and, if made available -again: IN BOTH INSTANCES-, to different platforms, encoded in several resolutions.

Oh and yes, there are plenty of applications that do the job quite for free, including one of the original ones, by Apple, circa 1999, and still available.

And with that, I'll leave you to discuss among yourselves. I'll be checking once in a while to find out to what levels has this descended to, in amazement.

Dev, I wish you luck. Given the company you keep, you are going to need loads of it.

Are you crazy? Why would you believe that anybody would trust an open source software written by North European kids? After all, as we all know, nobody use Linux which was written by a North European kid Linus Torvalds 20 years ago. Skype? Nobody use that too ... it was written by an other North European kid. MySQL? No, not trustworthy at all. It was started by the North European David Axmark and the other North European Ulf Widenius. Nobody trust that and how can such open source software compete with Oracle or MSSQL? History clearly proves, the open source software of North European kids can't compete with commercial software, isn't it?

You should listen our Paycoin shill expert in this thread - who learnt everything he knows about software on this very Bitcointalk forum - that it is not possible  for an open source software to compete with Cisco, IBM. etc (never mind, the majority of Cisco and IBM infrastructure by now is on Linux - the open source software of the North European kid).

haha

Sometimes I dress up as Jamie Dimon for him so he can put a face to the imaginary friend.

Yes. if you don't believe you can move on and keep promoting your Paycoin and IconicExpert coin. Bye Paycoin shill.

LOL
when you read you can give him a toy phone, while he is listening he can call to his friend Jamie Dimon the chairman of Chase to discuss the next billion dollar investment.

 

Anyone knows what the actor barabbas Jose is doing here? He says the developers are a bunch of idiot kids who have no idea how software works. He has very low opinion on "this crowd" and he says the supporters are stupid, idiots, greedy bastards, liars. he also thinks nothing in Gadgetcoin make sense. IoT? naaahhhhh. jizzmo? nahhhhh. streemo? nahhhhhh. CCTV? nahhhhhhh. white paper? nahhhhhh. W3C? nahhhhhhh.
network fee? nahhhhhh.
what barabbas batman Jose is doing here?

The sick actor posted yesterday that he has billionaire friends, so why he is here and why he argues 20 hours a day about a coin that he doesn't like if he has billionaire friends?

I suggest you read the white paper, you have huge misunderstandings about the project. In fact, I haven't done my good deed for the day, and I question your literacy, so why don't I read it to you over Skype? I have a feeling you need someone more along the lines of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Sullivan but I am willing to try.

Oh well, here comes the mumbo jumbo about terms used already for decades... ok, if you need a link to already made UML sequence, just google it. Make a couple of substitutions and it will p-ass m... with this crowd, I guarantee it.

Now, if getting on the door -on any door- is difficulty number one (even above actually having a flawlessly working product), when you present a blockchain-based system, try that people don't have a laugh attack when you address "robust security", ok? It's the very first thing anyone -let alone IT professionals-, associates with bitcoin, crypto in general and blockchain in particular, ok? Oh and before you start mentioning IBM again, let me tell you something before you are taken for a complete joke: When IBM calls -although they are usually called, not the other way around-, the decision-makers LISTEN, alright? When Gadgetcoin, -you know, those anonymous guys from northern Europe selling budget Chinese cameras- calls, well...what would you really do if you were in their shoes?

And enough of this crazy stupidity that is completely getting out of hand already again. I mean to have big ideas is nice and all. Positive. But when you want to come to the party 140 years too late, well ... you are probably not going to be dressed for the occasion, so to speak.

Moving on... what other "things" can you manage through the blockchain that can actually bring some innovation, and practical use, really AND, also, at least potentially, bring in some though? You think Cisco is going to get worried because you may get a byte of their video conference cake any time soon? You REALLY believe ANY company in the planet is going to trust their data to GDC? Come on...

That will be awesome!

As I said many times, in my opinion the security itself is a USP in IoT and if you adopt the W3C standards you can claim a solid base for your security implementation.

I understand because you posted many months ago and several times in this thread that you had been working on the security, CCTV camera use case for long, so of course that is not a new business for you, but could you explain in a document where are you currently with the development? Could you put together a high level document about the main features of the security/CCTV industrial use case please? I would pass that document to the security companies who are already interested, familiar with your white paper and very open minded to an open source solution.
The audience of the doc will be IT professionals, not executive but technical level so UML sequence, object, state, deployment, etc. diagrams would be very useful. When you compile the document don't worry about the nonsense of the troll about free software. Really, please ignore this pathetic troll, his "free software exists for this task" nonsense is irrelevant. The document I would like to get from you is for IT professionals whom companies currently pay a minimum of 10k per annum for commercial software license and they fully understand enterprise CCTV software cost money. They understand there is no free software exists for an enterprise, they will be willing to pay the GadgetNet network fee just like currently they pay the software license fee. As I said earlier, the current commercial software of my contacts are lack of
- robust security
- PPKI certificate management
- configurable authentication schemes
- device provisioning
- configurable access control
- flexible HTML5 UI

precisely the features of the GadgetNet solution, so could you please elaborate these features, again UML diagrams would be fine.

Keep up the good work guys, personally I am very happy to help to make this work!

Yes you clearly are a person that uses logic and reason as his sword, piercing the naivety of lesser intellects, never stooping to the level of emotion and personal attacks.

Devs! Is it possible to open a moderated thread? if anybody would have any doubts about barabbas batman's mental condition, the above reference to Jamie Dimon, the chairman of JPMorgan Chase proves that barabbas Jose batman actor is totally sick in the head. he is clearly belong to psychiatric institutions and he shouldn't be in digital currency forums. The doctors would give him a phone in a mental hospital and he could call all day to Jamie Dimon from there for free. The problem is, the crazy actor is not going to sign up to a treatment because he is crazy.

the only way to have peace from the broken mind of the jobless actor is to open a moderated thread, pls!
 

Great, thanks!

The collaboration has started with W3C. Tibor from ZoVolt has submitted pull requests and as far as I know he works on security stuff these days. We are working on a simulator using the WebRTC protocol and will commit that.
Absolutely, we will be combining all W3C codes with GadgetNet. To have a code based on open standards is the main purpose of the collaboration.

What is the github link?

No problem, 3 weeks is fine, this is a holiday time anyway :-)))

I spoke this afternoon to another security company and I will pass their feedback to you. I explained the access control and provisioning aspects of device management from your white paper and yes, it is a real issue with current software and since your software can make obsolete current hardware solutions/functions we have a very good chance to get into a very large and lucrative market.

If I understand correctly what's happening on github, it seems the work has started with W3C. Will you merge the W3C code into GadgetNet? I think pulling the W3C code into GadgetNet would give lots of credibility to the project.