I don't quite understand:
In addition, which mechanism will be put in place to prevent that one of the "anonymous" development team member runs away "accidentally" with the "tax" jackpot?
If you referring to automation of the price stabilization mechanism. This can only be done when an exchange with a API accepts Globe. Once an exchange accepts Globe it is easy to use the API to build a price stabilization mechanism.
Please clarify if I have miss-understood your question.
In addition, which mechanism will be put in place to prevent that one of the "anonymous" development team member runs away "accidentally" with the "tax" jackpot?
If you referring to automation of the price stabilization mechanism. This can only be done when an exchange with a API accepts Globe. Once an exchange accepts Globe it is easy to use the API to build a price stabilization mechanism.
Please clarify if I have miss-understood your question.
My mistake, you are correct, 20%. BTW, I really love the concept of price stabilization, dev team funding, and marketing budget - I believe that it is the only way forward for the crypto-currency world in general.
But, having said that, my question is related to credibility and accountability of the GLB system. "Who" will control and pull the trigger each time a price stabilization intervention is required, and who will control the remaining tax pot and decide where and when to distribute the coins. Anonymous team members, by definition, can't provide this accountability and credibility concept, which I believe, is necessary for the coin to succeed. We will have to stop hiding behind our coin addresses, or forum pseudo names, if we want people with real money to invest in those coins and to use them. In exchange for those work positions, salaries could be agreed upon by the GLB community for the person accountable for those mechanism and the safekeeping of the "tax" pot, and for maintaining the coin (dev team). In the past, the crypto community has seen so many originally well-intentioned operators run away with coins, without leaving a forwarding address (50BTC.com, as prime example) - that has to stop. And, one of the only way to do it, in my opinion, is to come out on the open from the beginning.
Ok, I will try and address all part of your question. Please tell me if I miss something their seems to be alot
. 1. By the time their is enough depth in the Globe market a exchange will take it on. You can see Globe has had the same price for a while now. The price stabilization mechanism will be fully automated using the API. Most exchange APIs allow you to place trades when the GLB market price has XYZ conditions e.g. 20% decline in 24 hours we can automatically tell the exchange to place a trade for us using the API.
2. I hope to run the 10% dev team section more like a profitable business rather than foundation or non-profit as I believe these tend to be very inefficient and cumbersome. ( Yes im a good old capitalist
) 3. Over the long run I hope to de-centralize further, take more control away from us when it comes to the price stabilization and reserves and give it to the network. How much of this can be done and how this will be done in the future is still a question to be answered.
4. Once an exchange takes on Globe the entire process of reserves and price stabilization will be automated and essentially un-touchable by the dev team as the a nice scripts and servers will handle all the trades.
5. Regarding your question about accountability. The entire Bitcoin community is anonymous but that I what I love about it. Regardless of anything If you can prove you can be trusted and have a good idea your project can press forward. I always make sure what I am doing is morally correct before proceeding with a task or exchange to prove that I am trustworthy.
The point you made when you said we must stop hiding under our pseudo names if we want people with money to invest is an arguable point. I agree some people may be put off by investing in coins if individuals are not accountable but lets not forget that we still do not know who created Bitcoin and he/she/they too used a psudo name but still the price managed to hit $1000 a piece. I agree that with Globe it is slightly different in that we have more control but as I stated above if we can de-centralize to the point where price stabilization and reserves are controlled by the network, Globe becomes just like Bitcoin.
Additionally, consistent trust can be built regardless of your face or name. This has already been proven in the Bitcoin community. Many people risk huge sums of money by using users on the forum as an escrow service. These individuals names, identities are not known but their consistent trustworthiness has meant they can reliably hold huge sums of money and handle transactions on behalf on individuals.
Finally, It would be foolish for a member of the dev team to "run away" with all the money. As I stated before such an event would cause a huge price crash. So the XXX Globes that individual stole would be worthless due to his actions. You can see how this causes a paradox making it logically pointless to scam people.
. Yes your are meant to replace "USER" with an actual username such as "MassimoJee". The same applies for "PASS". 
!