"GOBYTE is a better DASH" and "to go where Dash is today" don't work together.
Because we are not aiming to be Dash.
Now that you seem to be willing to argue about logic, let's do so:
"Based on Dash, it's an enhanced and further developed version"
That quote stems from your OP. Both terms "enhanced" and "further developed" can only be used together with a reference point. Since the only reference point you provide is "Dash", I assume you were in fact referring to Dash when saying that your version is enhanced and further developed. I might be wrong with my assumption, but that would be the result of you providing insufficient information. You could also mean "enhanced" and "further developed" compared to Applecoin, whereas you made use of Dash as a code base. I doubt you meant that
My sentence implies that you are millions of miles away from DASH, and to surpass it you would first have to get where it is. The ridiculous thing is exactly that you say you have already an enhanced and further developed version. Funny enough. Good luck
All the other coins are enchanted and further developed versions of the Bitcoin, yet they didn't go into the same direction.
Funny.
Talking about different locations while developing globally decentralized and distributed technology is funny. As for your Bitcoin comparison: the most advanced coin out there is Bitcoin, not any other coin. Currencies can't exist without an ecosystem. The ecosystem is an integral part of the technology itself. Bitcoin is the best coin currently in existence. Picking a single feature, "improving" it and calling that coin a better coin is funny.