Thank you, that you believe in us, we have a hope, that we build ecosystem, that will live in synergy with our nature on this planet.
chrysophylax, my vision to build something better with technologies, that we have. If tomorrow (in next year) school children will create own coins with names and tickers whatever they want, even it will be 100500 BTC chains and 15 GRN, from them will survive not so much.
Elon Musk, for example bring all his technologies to community, this is open source behavior, that we respect
https://www.tesla.com/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-youBecause its to much time to spend on courts, they spend this time to research new areas.
Maybe someone have idea to occupy all tickers from AAA to ZZZ with their coins that have or haven't real background of values, just because they are first... and its their right. Any ticker can be yours on that exchange where you have arrangements(even on offline markets), and we agree with this. Money for money have no sense. Must be real resources, humans and technologies behind any blockchain and we have it!
Coinmarketcap, CryptoID, Cryptopia: its your right to use GRN there, because you do it earlier. On our own exchange we will use it, and its disrespect to us to require do not use it from the face of all crypto community.
On my humble opinion, no one can't behave on crypto market, like a regulator, its an open space that provide possibilities and options to create better world.
We create our coin from idea to make offline technologies more sensitivity to the nature, and took the name Green, the logic abbreviation from Green is GRN, during any abbreviation rules, any other exchange and price comparison sites may call us as they want(GRC, GNC, GC, whatever), I do not see problem with this. I provide example with BCC and BCH
We have enough communications with scientists(academics), politicians, cosmonauts and engineers communities to be sure, that we have sources to provide ECO technologies in the real world.
With respect to your coin,
Green Team
Ignorance is bliss I guess ...
Good points exists when not only a good argument is had, but also FACTUALITY plays the major part in them.
I (hence my company) agree with the vision you have of making things a better place in the CryptoIndustry, but the wrong way about it is simply what you are doing. I shall oppose it in every way, NOT a regulatory body, but as someone who DOES stand for the opensource systems, freedom, and the right to bear and protect the Ticker, logo, and business we have built so as to NOT confuse it with what you are doing ... or any one else for that matter.
As for the imbeciles that curse and promote such behaviour (like the post under yours), then it proves my words and indicates the type of following you are already creating. I too can cures and upset a lot of people (I have in the past), but that proves nothign more than the type person you may at any one time or another. This is doom in a sentence, as well as it is in a business.
Your stubborn promotion of the so called 'right' to bear the ticker, does NOT condone the disrespect you show to others in the CryptoIndustry that have a long standing and functional place in it. namely us at CWI.
You have put your post in the ground, as have I and the company that backs what we do. I created this from the ground up, as you are doing now, and will make sure that at every stance we have, we will oppose the use of the GRN ticker other than our OWN granite project. This is a position we will take and will make sure you cannot abuse that right to bear, and the non-right to disrespect, that you seem to think you possess.
ANYONE that follows this project need to be fully informed of ALL the history and actions that take place for it to be where it will be, so that they can make up their own mind. If you think you are doing nothing wrong? Then think again and think very hard and long about it. When it comes back on you tenfold, then you will know that all this has been foretold and you have been warned regarding ANY of the future issues this holds.
As for bringing forward a quote that is one of supposedly Elon Musks', that quote is a paradox even for him. PATENTS themselves are inherent to proprietary and private OWNERSHIP of such things that are part thereof. So in saying a patent belongs to the public means that the privately owned OWNERSHIP of the patent is in fact NOT owned by anyone else but the patent holder and NO ONE ELSE is allowed ownership of it. What a reference you make. Besides that, Elon is such a massive magnet for people like you to take his words out opf context and use them is such a way as to back the disrespect you prove over and over again. ANYONE can say they are in contact with, and converse with, scientists and academics alike. But the proof of the matter is simple. IF this were the case, even THEY would say a similar thing to what I have stated, and justify it categorically. This is simply because anyone in their right mind would not wish to create issues in a project that is supposedly for the peace of the industry and world alike. Seriously, you have some real world concept issues that need to be acknowledged here. Especially when it comes to 'respect' once again.
In reference to 'your' exchange. Who on earth will trust an exchange, and a PERSON backing that exchange, that treats his fellow Cryptonians in such a disrespectful way, except those that have no moral fiber in their being also. Money plays a massive part in these decisions of yours, NOT the environment OR the 'green' side of the world. Plain to see for the experienced and veteran alike, not so for the uninitiated, as shown in a couple of the comments after your post.
One day, you will fashion a post that actually redeems itself to the annals of history as being a respectful response. Till then, all I have mentioned and stated are backed by your own words and actions, and in doing so, your intention for nothing more than money in your pocket is plain to see. THAT my dear 'person hiding behind CryptorClub', is what makes a project, and the intent behind it.
#crysx