@Eliphaz Fimk
If you keep on with your fairytales, I will also keep on! Are you really that self-destructive? Are you unable to anticipate that it is impossible for me to not react if you lie about me and what I've said?
Okay, let's move on. I have time.
First about my request to show me proof where I said what you have claimed:
@tempus
nothing needs to be "rephrased". There are two long posts without any answer!
My answers were here
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15560942https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15560380As can be seen upon review, those posts included numerous to-the-point responses to the issues brought up previously, which I'll be happy to expand on with anyone willing to know more details or clarifications.
I won't bother you anymore. I'm okay with the answers you gave
Thanks, appreciated!
What are you doing here?
You try to give the impression that I would have said that there are two long posts without any answer, and now you show two posts of yours you try pretend as your answers.
But, you intentionally don't quote the full part. The links are missing! Please click on my posts. Where did you reply? Is it right to this say about me:
"(...) you claimed NONE of your previous questions were answered, and that's grossly incorrect and provocational statement. It makes you look like a troll, better ignored (...) "Take a look into the mirror, boy. What you're trying to do here is the total opposite of showing honesty. It's the opposite of being smart. It's kind of crazy.
You try to mislead people about the sequence of my and your own posts, while the fact that you don't quote the links shows, that it's not a mistake but intention. It's a very manipulative attempt and at the same time it's such low-level. I don't get it.
Now something about what you said before that:
"I believe I've responded to criticism concerning business and technology. The rest to me seems about the way of perceiving our behavior, issues considered personally offensive, non-professional, suspicious etc. a lot of opinions. Opinions are by definition always justifiable, I don't see there's much to discuss about those outpourings unless clearly pointed out what the worry is."You would like to give the impression that my conclusions are just personal opinions, right? Don't you see that you yourself proof my so called opinions as facts?
Isn't it a fact that you did not do just the basic work before asking for money?
Isn't it a fact that you show a lack of accuracy even in the explanations for the ICO?
Isn't it a fact that you show proof for your own dishonesty?
Isn't it a fact that you show a lack of sense for marketing because all this looks very bad in all possible ways?
Isn't it a fact that you show a lack of intelligence because you are not able to anticipate questions and reactions?
Isn't it a fact that you lied?
Isn't it a fact that you constantly try to mislead people with manipulative attempts?
Isn't it a fact that you even downgrade your own partner with what you said about him to blame it all on him?
Isn't it a fact that you act very self-destructive?
Show me just one line that is not a fact! I will show you proof why I'm convinced it is!
And very self-revealing is also this:
There are dozens of ICOs a day that dont have a website, they dont have a roadmap, they dont have RL dev pics and bios.
HEAT has all of these things, and they are doing their ICO through a small exchange to ensure only people reading up on the project get to invest in it early on. = Smarter investors = longer holders (for the majority, that might be safe to say).
This projects got a lot of promise, and 10k-13k sats right now is a dream entry.... think of Lisk / waves - their best ICO prices where 30kish... and they dropped. This project only has upward potential.
Lets do it HEAT!
That's your quality-standard? Presenting a project like sand between sand?
No intention to present quality to be recognized as a pearl that might be worth to invest in? You are the opposite of a perfectionist.
This is you:
- making a website
- making a roadmap
- making pics
check, check, check, let's do an ICO to get money!
Let me tell you what I did not say until now but what I see in the fact that you chose C-Cex for the ICO:
1. Lack of money --> they are known as cheap
2. Lack of sense for marketing ---> their reputation is bad, especially because they did a lot of Scam-ICO's
An ICO that clearly shows the priority on the ICO instead on the project. Plus C-Cex. Money is needed, right? But too lazy to write down at least a simple Whitepaper! How long would that take? Some hours for a bad one. Some days for something that wouldn't be special but would give more insight. Some weeks to do it right and in combination with an audit for example. But you are too lazy even to write some lines down. And sure, my posts are too long! And the missing Whitepaper is nothing. Wherever I look into I see the same pattern.
But high promises and arrogance plus naive low-level-manipulative-attempts and an attitude as if you would have the natural right to ask for money because you guys made a website, a roadmap and pictures.
And sure, there are enough naive and unexperienced guys and even more gamblers to send you money. You will learn that money can be pressure. It creates very intense identifications over a long time. And I'm not speaking just of Scams. It doesn't matter what you plan. You will find out that I'm not guessing.
