Author

Topic: [ANN] Ħ [HODL] 5% Interest. No Staking Req. Term Deposits 10%. Solo Mining. - page 183. (Read 472950 times)

full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Try with other binary, your result seems way too low.

Or reboot the computer and run only the miner, maybe something else is also using the CPU giving you lower results.

Intel Core i5 4690 @ 3.50GHz
Wallet - 71-84 h/S

Ok I rebooted and ran
hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693 -u name.worker - p password
and got 87-106

I ran
hodlmine.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693 -u name.worker - p password
and got 95-108

So, much better than the 71-84 with the wallet!!!
Success!

Which miner you using ? Can you upload that ,please . i tried some miners but all of them failed!
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Yet another suggestion that might already be in the works...

I think I've mentioned before that the process for selecting a TD deposit address
is a bit clumsy. In summary: go to receive tab, click on address, click show, click copy address,
go to deposit tab, paste address, ...
It would be nice if we could select the address from the deposit tab. The button is there but
no previously used addresses are listed.

But today's suggestion is to display the maturing block number when a TD is created. You have
chosen to model TD based on time, but technically it is based on blocks. The familiarity
of the time model may be comforting to some but I'm a geek, I want the technical details.

My ideal model would be to have the choice of selecting the duration of a TD in number of blocks,
or the maturation block number, in addition to the current time based option. This would also
provide more granularity as multiple TDs can mature the same day but at different block numbers.

Currently, to find the maturation block number of a TD I have to find it in the random list after creating
it. That can get boring with lots of TDs.

The list of previously used addresses only include addresses outside of ones in that local wallet.. Maybe we could expand this..

Yes this is why we added "blocks" as a unit of measure in the drop down box when making a TD..
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
Yet another suggestion that might already be in the works...

I think I've mentioned before that the process for selecting a TD deposit address
is a bit clumsy. In summary: go to receive tab, click on address, click show, click copy address,
go to deposit tab, paste address, ...
It would be nice if we could select the address from the deposit tab. The button is there but
no previously used addresses are listed.

But today's suggestion is to display the maturing block number when a TD is created. You have
chosen to model TD based on time, but technically it is based on blocks. The familiarity
of the time model may be comforting to some but I'm a geek, I want the technical details.

My ideal model would be to have the choice of selecting the duration of a TD in number of blocks,
or the maturation block number, in addition to the current time based option. This would also
provide more granularity as multiple TDs can mature the same day but at different block numbers.

Currently, to find the maturation block number of a TD I have to find it in the random list after creating
it. That can get boring with lots of TDs.
staff
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4111
Crypto Swap Exchange
member
Activity: 122
Merit: 16
Not sure that solo mining is a great choice with all of the network hashrate at the moment, especially if it is with a single CPU only.

Great answer, thanks!

My question was about the feasibility, not if it makes sense!

Btw: i found 4 blocks in a week mining solo with 85 H/s...that was 3 times more profitable than pool mining...with wallet standard miner :-)

So my question still stands. Any advice?
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
What hashrate are you getting from that CPU?
staff
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4111
Crypto Swap Exchange
Anyone with AMD supporting AES try the wolf optimized hodlminer with the bdver binaries?
Yep. My AMD FX-8320 works very well with hodlminer-bdver3.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Not sure that solo mining is a great choice with all of the network hashrate at the moment, especially if it is with a single CPU only.

member
Activity: 122
Merit: 16
Hi everyone!

Is there a way to use the latest wolf0 miner for solo mining?
How do have i to configure the conf-file of the wallet and how would the start string for the miner look like?

Thanks and regards,
djoser.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Anyone with AMD supporting AES try the wolf optimized hodlminer with the bdver binaries?
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
www.cryptocompare.com
Hey, all. I collect CPU stats:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1U8qEuo2usb_nWXGuzRNHGSBsI-E1BhczyruZ4Y_Ge2w/edit?usp=sharing

Hope it help someone to choose better CPU Smiley

nop, it just made me sad because mine wont do that well xDDDDD. thank you, good info! Smiley
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Try with other binary, your result seems way too low.

Or reboot the computer and run only the miner, maybe something else is also using the CPU giving you lower results.

Intel Core i5 4690 @ 3.50GHz
Wallet - 71-84 h/S

Ok I rebooted and ran
hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693 -u name.worker - p password
and got 87-106

I ran
hodlmine.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693 -u name.worker - p password
and got 95-108

So, much better than the 71-84 with the wallet!!!
Success!
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Intel Core i5 4690 @ 3.50GHz
Wallet - 71-84 h/S

New Hodlminer AES-NI Wolf0 Optimized Miner Windows Binaries
hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe

seems to be lower at like 46-64 h/S

Dunno why ?
Using this command line :
hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693

Try with other binary, your result seems way too low.

Or reboot the computer and run only the miner, maybe something else is also using the CPU giving you lower results.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Intel Core i5 4690 @ 3.50GHz
Wallet - 71-84 h/S

New Hodlminer AES-NI Wolf0 Optimized Miner Windows Binaries
hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe

seems to be lower at like 46-64 h/S

Dunno why ?
Using this command line :
hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
i5 4670K @  ~100 hash/s - Hodlminer AES-NI Wolf vs CPUminer ~80hash/s

newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
i7 6700K @ 4.6 Ghz ~330 hash/s - Hodlminer AES-NI Wolf

https://i.imgur.com/DjwbI1F.png
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 11
Some more for your list:

Core i5 4200U @ 2.27 Ghz (Stock) ~ 50H/s  - Wolfminer

Core i5 2520M @ 2.4 Ghz (Stock) ~ 50/s - Standardminer

2 x Xeon E5520 (Gainestown, Socket 1366) @ 2.26 GHz (Stock) ~ 80 H/s - Standardminer


sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
HoDl going down @ yobit .  Cry Cry Cry

It's been going sideways for about 2 weeks at about 6000 sats.

That's pretty good considering

i) the bonus rate on unlocked funds is 1365% APR! (Double that for HODLd funds)
ii) Bitcoin has been appreciating in value

Don't forget we also have c-cex as well.. volume seems to be shifting there latley..
https://c-cex.com/index.html?p=hodl-btc
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
Hey, all. I collect CPU stats:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1U8qEuo2usb_nWXGuzRNHGSBsI-E1BhczyruZ4Y_Ge2w/edit?usp=sharing

Hope it help someone to choose better CPU Smiley

2 more cpus for your list - hashrate based on wallet miner

Intel Pentium G3258 20th anniversary edition 3.2GHz == 25 h/s
                                                 Intel i7 920 2.67GHz == 40 h/s

BTW, good job!!!!!
Jump to: