[ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast - page 134.

zhpool

member

Activity: 152

Merit: 10

Quote from: realrover on March 24, 2014, 11:21:52 PM

I'm not sure that you will actually find many CPU miners out there nowadays

We do have 43 workers connections now working at diff around 0.000626.
and we thought GPU miners can live the unstable diff within several minutes at start up.

Quote from: realrover on March 24, 2014, 11:21:52 PM

Also, I noticed that my miners were losing connection to your pool0 server in a strange way without switching to backup server

yes, we got informed about the unstable state of pool0 about 3 hours ago, obviously we should keep our eyes on this new server. Sorry for inconvenience. anyway, the issue is fixed now

realrover

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: zhpool on March 24, 2014, 10:43:42 PM

Quote from: realrover on March 24, 2014, 07:52:28 PM

Anybody is experiencing problems with zhpool? My miners are running at full speed (about 68 MH), but pool's dashboard shows 200-300 KH. What's going on lately? Pool owner didn't answer my email sent several hours ago... Hmm...

Hi realrover

To be friendly to CPU miners, we start from a very low diff, so you may observe your hashrate much low than your actual hashrate, minutes later, the web will show your hashrate correct.

Be comfortable with this, your profit will not be affected

Thanks
ZHpool

Being friendly to CPU miners you (certainly unintentionally) are unfriendly to GPU miners. I'm not sure that you will actually find many CPU miners out there nowadays, so this argument doesn't make much sense to me... Also, I noticed that my miners were losing connection to your pool0 server in a strange way without switching to backup server. They were kind of stuck. I didn't observe such problems with another pool.

zhpool

member

Activity: 152

Merit: 10

Quote from: bradmurmz on March 24, 2014, 10:52:14 PM

Quote from: loicatraile on March 24, 2014, 08:49:01 PM

Hi community!
I would like you to spend just 1 minute and send Bter.com a request for adding HVC to their exchange. This would increase the exposure of Heavycoin and help us all

Here´s the link

http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

yeah, everyone should write a nice quick note to them giving one reason why heavycoin is going to be big soon...

yeah, actually I wrote something to our miners about what we thought of HeavyCoin, on our homepage http://heavycoin.zhpool.com

bradmurmz

full member

Activity: 205

Merit: 100

Quote from: loicatraile on March 24, 2014, 08:49:01 PM

Hi community!
I would like you to spend just 1 minute and send Bter.com a request for adding HVC to their exchange. This would increase the exposure of Heavycoin and help us all

Here´s the link

http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

yeah, everyone should write a nice quick note to them giving one reason why heavycoin is going to be big soon...

zhpool

member

Activity: 152

Merit: 10

Quote from: realrover on March 24, 2014, 07:52:28 PM

Anybody is experiencing problems with zhpool? My miners are running at full speed (about 68 MH), but pool's dashboard shows 200-300 KH. What's going on lately? Pool owner didn't answer my email sent several hours ago... Hmm...

Hi realrover

To be friendly to CPU miners, we start from a very low diff, so you may observe your hashrate much low than your actual hashrate, minutes later, the web will show your hashrate correct.

Be comfortable with this, your profit will not be affected

Thanks
ZHpool

lagur

full member

Activity: 199

Merit: 100

At such difficulty, the price is too low compared to yesterday.

incin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: TheRealSteve on March 24, 2014, 08:55:11 PM

Quote from: incin on March 24, 2014, 08:25:08 PM

Hey how are you getting your hash data for all the pools? I know their pool hashrate is equal to the reported network hash, and they commented on it, but curious if your method is something they could add to guesstimate the network hash on their dashboard.

Nope - I'm just grabbing the data MPOS provides, which is the same as shown on most of their main pages and their blocks pages - except for 1gh, which doesn't use MPOS. However, after a complaint many pages back, I did start doing a weighted average of the hash rate for the tables. I haven't ever looked at the MPOS source to figure out if it's just reporting an instantaneous value or an average, itself. Both have pros/cons, but for my posts, averages work out better.

Ok i kinda figured you might be just pulling the reported hashes from all the pools. Logically couldn't the network hash be reverse calculated from the block time and difficulty (clearly would be skewed a bit)? I have no idea what it would take but seems that it should be possible. Any unaccounted for hash would other or something. I know Litecoin has a hash distribution page (https://www.litecoinpool.org/pools). Anything that can bring HVC more on par with the big boys would be good.

nonce-pool

full member

Activity: 149

Merit: 100

We could always use some more hashes at Nonce-Pool!

A little down on hash rate and a couple long rounds but we are still alive! Our pool is fast and reliable, check us out!

Feel like you are aimlessly voting?
Want your vote to mean something?
Tired of the big guys getting all the votes?
You can make a difference even on a smaller scale!
Pooled voting Coming soon...

http://hvc.nonce-pool.com

TheRealSteve

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

FUN > ROI

Quote from: incin on March 24, 2014, 08:25:08 PM

Hey how are you getting your hash data for all the pools? I know their pool hashrate is equal to the reported network hash, and they commented on it, but curious if your method is something they could add to guesstimate the network hash on their dashboard.

Nope - I'm just grabbing the data MPOS provides, which is the same as shown on most of their main pages and their blocks pages - except for 1gh, which doesn't use MPOS. However, after a complaint many pages back, I did start doing a weighted average of the hash rate for the tables. I haven't ever looked at the MPOS source to figure out if it's just reporting an instantaneous value or an average, itself. Both have pros/cons, but for my posts, averages work out better.

loicatraile

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Hi community!
I would like you to spend just 1 minute and send Bter.com a request for adding HVC to their exchange. This would increase the exposure of Heavycoin and help us all

Here´s the link

http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

incin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

TheRealSteve

Hey how are you getting your hash data for all the pools? I know their pool hashrate is equal to the reported network hash, and they commented on it, but curious if your method is something they could add to guesstimate the network hash on their dashboard.

realrover

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: TheRealSteve on March 24, 2014, 08:19:18 PM

Quote from: incin on March 24, 2014, 08:16:12 PM

the front end site was timing out. Hence the reason i asked earlier if they were getting ddos or something. I have them as backup for now.

That definitely happens a lot. The pool itself is fine, but the website drops out way more often than the operators should be comfortable with

Still, if you don't trust it - there's several other pools to choose from Cheesy

The problem is that there is nothing to choose from actually. I wanted to participate in hashrate distribution and tried heavycoinpool, then zhpool. Both have annoying glitches... Back to 1GH apparently.

TheRealSteve

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

FUN > ROI

Quote from: incin on March 24, 2014, 08:16:12 PM

the front end site was timing out. Hence the reason i asked earlier if they were getting ddos or something. I have them as backup for now.

That definitely happens a lot. The pool itself is fine, but the website drops out way more often than the operators should be comfortable with

Still, if you don't trust it - there's several other pools to choose from Cheesy

incin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: TheRealSteve on March 24, 2014, 08:04:38 PM

Quote from: realrover on March 24, 2014, 07:52:28 PM

Anybody is experiencing problems with zhpool? My miners are running at full speed (about 68 MH), but pool's dashboard shows 200-300 KH. What's going on lately? Pool owner didn't answer my email sent several hours ago... Hmm...

Your dashboard's hashing speed indication is pretty bad. It has to make guesses about how fast you're actually mining based on your submitted shares.
zhpool's overall hash rate has been pretty high (between 3Ghash/s and 6Ghash/s). Nonce appears to have dropped quite a bit, though.
Seems some of the heavier miners have switched pools or switched altcoins entirely (black seems popularish).
The usual graphs in the morning

I realize graphs aren't to be taken seriously but my hash is a solid 105Mh/s from my miners. Dashboard was around 20Mh/s when i check and the front end site was timing out. Hence the reason i asked earlier if they were getting ddos or something. I have them as backup for now.

TheRealSteve

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

FUN > ROI

Quote from: realrover on March 24, 2014, 07:52:28 PM

Anybody is experiencing problems with zhpool? My miners are running at full speed (about 68 MH), but pool's dashboard shows 200-300 KH. What's going on lately? Pool owner didn't answer my email sent several hours ago... Hmm...

Your dashboard's hashing speed indication is pretty bad. It has to make guesses about how fast you're actually mining based on your submitted shares.
zhpool's overall hash rate has been pretty high (between 3Ghash/s and 6Ghash/s). Nonce appears to have dropped quite a bit, though.
Seems some of the heavier miners have switched pools or switched altcoins entirely (black seems popularish).
The usual graphs in the morning

incin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: realrover on March 24, 2014, 07:52:28 PM

Anybody is experiencing problems with zhpool? My miners are running at full speed (about 68 MH), but pool's dashboard shows 200-300 KH. What's going on lately? Pool owner didn't answer my email sent several hours ago... Hmm...

Was that way when i got up (12hrs ago). I pulled my miners away after just 4 hrs there. Undecided

realrover

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Anybody is experiencing problems with zhpool? My miners are running at full speed (about 68 MH), but pool's dashboard shows 200-300 KH. What's going on lately? Pool owner didn't answer my email sent several hours ago... Hmm...

satoshcode

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Just wanted to invite everyone to try http://heavycoin.satoshicode.com/ , we added support for Heavycoin recently. Deposits take a lot less than with Bitcoin. Let me know if you have any questions!

Kreativekrypto

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

1000% agree, devs lose motivation without incentive.

paulmaritz

sr. member

Activity: 672

Merit: 274

Quote from: bradmurmz on March 24, 2014, 04:42:19 PM

Quote from: svenp on March 24, 2014, 04:07:25 PM

Quote from: g0re79 on March 24, 2014, 03:59:56 PM

Quote from: svenp on March 24, 2014, 03:56:14 PM

What were/are the IPO funds to be used for? I haven't seen anything that explains that.

- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5505131
- https://heavycoin.github.io/ipo-stakeholders.html
- 20 secs of research, probably less than You had spend on Your post..

I've already read those. My question (again) is HOW ARE THE IPO FUNDS TO BE USED? To repeat, what are the BTC raised by the IPO to be used for / spent on.

IPO funds are used to pay developers for their time so they dont have to get a job and can focus on developing HVC and the community. Yeah there is no way to monitor what they are doing with them, but I would rather have the developers getting paid, instead of working a job or doing client work.

The developers are solid, and nobody should work for free unless you have the luxury to do so...

just my 2 satoshis.

I fully agree.

Topic: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast - page 134. (Read 542277 times)