[ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast - page 187.

deadthings

sr. member

Activity: 1106

Merit: 255

Betking.io - Best Bitcoin Casino

Quote from: eightspaces on March 16, 2014, 07:58:57 AM

Quote from: TiberiuC on March 16, 2014, 07:56:47 AM

Quote from: ghur on March 16, 2014, 06:48:31 AM

Quote from: ciocgun on March 16, 2014, 06:38:16 AM

no blocks found in 3days?
http://heavycoinpool.com

That's generally what is expected when the pool's total hashrate equals about 2 rubber bands and half a pack of gum.

So this is not a pool error?

no, not a pool error. 1GH has basically 80%+ of the network's hashrate, hence heavycoinpool is useless

sad but true. the network is entirely monopolized

I would disagree with this assessment. Heavycoinpool is currently running at 45 Mh/s, which should be enough to find one block every 4-6 hours depending on luck. To have gone 28 hours so far suggests something might be wrong.

syber

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: danb1983 on March 16, 2014, 09:45:56 AM

Yes, I think uncertainty with the amount of posts about GPU lately and mixed views on what this will mean for the value and long term future of the coin, and what mgt. response will be - would be good to hear from those running it as to what is actually going on with GPU or not and how this will change / be rolled out to the masses within the next weeks or not?

I was/am LOVING HVC, but I'm just hesitating on investing BIG for now until there is more clear information on whats going on with GPU and what this means for a supposedly "CPU-only" coin.

Still masses of potential but needs some clarity and authority input on this issue.

Totally agree with you.

hashnine

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

So where is the command line binary miner?

danb1983

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: syber on March 16, 2014, 09:16:48 AM

So GPU's are already mining this coin. Wasn't the point of this coin to remain a CPU only mined coin.
Guess that is just nature of the beast. Kind of blows for those that don't have a massive mining rig.

Any speculation on why the price dipped below .00003750?

Quote from: incin on March 16, 2014, 09:38:34 AM

Uncertainty. Not enough buyer support.

Yes, I think uncertainty with the amount of posts about GPU lately and mixed views on what this will mean for the value and long term future of the coin, and what mgt. response will be - would be good to hear from those running it as to what is actually going on with GPU or not and how this will change / be rolled out to the masses within the next weeks or not?

I was/am LOVING HVC, but I'm just hesitating on investing BIG for now until there is more clear information on whats going on with GPU and what this means for a supposedly "CPU-only" coin.

Still masses of potential but needs some clarity and authority input on this issue.

incin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Uncertainty. Not enough buyer support.

syber

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

So GPU's are already mining this coin. Wasn't the point of this coin to remain a CPU only mined coin.
Guess that is just nature of the beast. Kind of blows for those that don't have a massive mining rig.

Any speculation on why the price dipped below .00003750?

massiveman

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

i tell you what i'm noticing some of these buy orders are big, i think a lot of the hvc is going into a few hands so that it's inevitable before too long that the price is set for a surge as not that many people will want to sell. I for one have horded as much HVC as possible from the very beginning.

deamon

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

yes!?

Quote from: nanoprobe on March 16, 2014, 08:18:25 AM

Quote from: eightspaces on March 16, 2014, 05:18:31 AM

Quote from: nanoprobe on March 16, 2014, 04:59:45 AM

Quote from: con on March 16, 2014, 04:55:45 AM

Quote from: eightspaces on March 16, 2014, 04:19:29 AM

keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated

Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth.

All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now).

Won't matter.

WRONG

One of us will be that's for sure. GPU farms vs. botnets. Everyone else, green weenie. I can hardly wait.

its hard for us all to wait

nanoprobe

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1000

Traveling in subspace

Quote from: eightspaces on March 16, 2014, 05:18:31 AM

Quote from: nanoprobe on March 16, 2014, 04:59:45 AM

Quote from: con on March 16, 2014, 04:55:45 AM

Quote from: eightspaces on March 16, 2014, 04:19:29 AM

keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated

Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth.

All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now).

Won't matter.

WRONG

One of us will be that's for sure. GPU farms vs. botnets. Everyone else, green weenie. I can hardly wait.

eightspaces

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: TiberiuC on March 16, 2014, 07:56:47 AM

Quote from: ghur on March 16, 2014, 06:48:31 AM

Quote from: ciocgun on March 16, 2014, 06:38:16 AM

no blocks found in 3days?
http://heavycoinpool.com

That's generally what is expected when the pool's total hashrate equals about 2 rubber bands and half a pack of gum.

So this is not a pool error?

no, not a pool error. 1GH has basically 80%+ of the network's hashrate, hence heavycoinpool is useless

sad but true. the network is entirely monopolized

TiberiuC

sr. member

Activity: 311

Merit: 250

Quote from: ghur on March 16, 2014, 06:48:31 AM

Quote from: ciocgun on March 16, 2014, 06:38:16 AM

no blocks found in 3days?
http://heavycoinpool.com

That's generally what is expected when the pool's total hashrate equals about 2 rubber bands and half a pack of gum.

So this is not a pool error?

ghur

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: ciocgun on March 16, 2014, 06:38:16 AM

no blocks found in 3days?
http://heavycoinpool.com

That's generally what is expected when the pool's total hashrate equals about 2 rubber bands and half a pack of gum.

ciocgun

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 250

no blocks found in 3days?
http://heavycoinpool.com

asdlolciterquit

hero member

Activity: 1666

Merit: 565

How many HVC i mine for day with an AMD A8 6600K?

ghur

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

GPU miners already work. The authors are just taking their cut first before releasing it into the wild.

eightspaces

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: nanoprobe on March 16, 2014, 04:59:45 AM

Quote from: con on March 16, 2014, 04:55:45 AM

Quote from: eightspaces on March 16, 2014, 04:19:29 AM

keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated

Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth.

All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now).

Won't matter.

WRONG

nanoprobe

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1000

Traveling in subspace

Quote from: con on March 16, 2014, 04:55:45 AM

Quote from: eightspaces on March 16, 2014, 04:19:29 AM

keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated

Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth.

All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now).

Won't matter.

con

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

Quote from: eightspaces on March 16, 2014, 04:19:29 AM

keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated

Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth.

All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now).

eightspaces

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: massiveman on March 16, 2014, 04:49:56 AM

this coin will be fine, there will be a huge influx of mining/difficulty increase when the gpu miner comes out.

yes, but not with "CPU-only" and "cpu only forever" statements all over the site.

massiveman

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

this coin will be fine, there will be a huge influx of mining/difficulty increase when the gpu miner comes out.

Topic: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast - page 187. (Read 542277 times)