just showing where we are with Heavycoin at the moment... 2400 kHash/s per GTX 780 Ti
at only just above half the TDP power of 250 Watts...
at only just above half the TDP power of 250 Watts...
http://s10.postimg.org/9iluzv1kp/hvcgpu.png
Topic: [ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast - page 193. (Read 542277 times)
March 14, 2014, 09:26:02 PM
http://s10.postimg.org/9iluzv1kp/hvcgpu.png
March 14, 2014, 09:09:59 PM
how can u tell that miners are not interested anymore?
March 14, 2014, 09:01:31 PM
Miners are slowly turning off appeal for this coin.
March 14, 2014, 07:37:58 PM
Supposedly there will be a pump in an hour or two
March 14, 2014, 07:12:42 PM
Buying volume is picking up... I think it's started!
March 14, 2014, 06:18:11 PM
Volume on Mintpal is CRAZY for a coin this new. Good job Devs!
The major innovation here is the voting... We can forget all the hash function debates, because this is obviously more ASIC resistant than SHA256/Bitcoin, so we can forget quark which is a major overkill anyways. Most importantly there is a decentralized mechanism for control of supply. which is a major innovation and valuable contribution to the crypto world.
Im still buying..
Im still buying..
Thanks to both.
Volume is definitely crazy high for only a few days out since launch, so definitely lots of interest. People hated on litecoin when it came out too... The decentralized voting on coin properties is a major step forward. I've been waiting for something exactly like this, and you guys have successfully made it a reality.. Great job!
March 14, 2014, 06:04:16 PM
Time for a hard fork already. Hire these guys and fork.
just showing where we are with Heavycoin at the moment... 2400 kHash/s per GTX 780 Ti
at only just above half the TDP power of 250 Watts...
NOTE: this isn't cudaminer. It's a separate project, so don't expect to find this in the cudaminer trunk.
It might be merged in later on, but there are several proprietary stratum extensions made by the
1gh pool that are a bit messy to merge. This is the main reason we started with a fresh fork.
at only just above half the TDP power of 250 Watts...
Code:
2014-03-14 23:02:24] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://hvcpool.1gh.com:5333
[2014-03-14 23:02:24] 3 miner threads started, using 'heavy' algorithm.
[2014-03-14 23:02:26] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 5470 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:29] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 5933 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:42] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 6777 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:45] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 6755 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:48] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 6778 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:50] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 7294 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:50] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 7278 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:54] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 7267 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:55] accepted: 9/9 (100.00%), 7204 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:00] accepted: 10/10 (100.00%), 7288 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:15] accepted: 11/11 (100.00%), 7295 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:19] accepted: 12/12 (100.00%), 7311 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:24] accepted: 13/13 (100.00%), 7243 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:24] accepted: 14/14 (100.00%), 7243 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:25] accepted: 15/15 (100.00%), 7043 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:25] accepted: 16/16 (100.00%), 7043 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:28] accepted: 17/17 (100.00%), 7260 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:32] accepted: 18/18 (100.00%), 7279 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:34] accepted: 19/19 (100.00%), 7251 khash/s (yay!!!)
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce GTX 780 Ti Off | 0000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 49% 81C P0 137W / 350W | 94MiB / 3071MiB | 73% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 1 GeForce GTX 780 Ti Off | 0000:02:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 43% 79C P0 136W / 350W | 191MiB / 3071MiB | 80% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 2 GeForce GTX 780 Ti Off | 0000:03:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 47% 80C P0 134W / 350W | 101MiB / 3071MiB | 75% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
[2014-03-14 23:02:24] 3 miner threads started, using 'heavy' algorithm.
[2014-03-14 23:02:26] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 5470 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:29] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 5933 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:42] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 6777 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:45] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 6755 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:48] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 6778 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:50] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 7294 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:50] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 7278 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:54] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 7267 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:02:55] accepted: 9/9 (100.00%), 7204 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:00] accepted: 10/10 (100.00%), 7288 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:15] accepted: 11/11 (100.00%), 7295 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:19] accepted: 12/12 (100.00%), 7311 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:24] accepted: 13/13 (100.00%), 7243 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:24] accepted: 14/14 (100.00%), 7243 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:25] accepted: 15/15 (100.00%), 7043 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:25] accepted: 16/16 (100.00%), 7043 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:28] accepted: 17/17 (100.00%), 7260 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:32] accepted: 18/18 (100.00%), 7279 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-03-14 23:03:34] accepted: 19/19 (100.00%), 7251 khash/s (yay!!!)
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce GTX 780 Ti Off | 0000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 49% 81C P0 137W / 350W | 94MiB / 3071MiB | 73% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 1 GeForce GTX 780 Ti Off | 0000:02:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 43% 79C P0 136W / 350W | 191MiB / 3071MiB | 80% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 2 GeForce GTX 780 Ti Off | 0000:03:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 47% 80C P0 134W / 350W | 101MiB / 3071MiB | 75% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
NOTE: this isn't cudaminer. It's a separate project, so don't expect to find this in the cudaminer trunk.
It might be merged in later on, but there are several proprietary stratum extensions made by the
1gh pool that are a bit messy to merge. This is the main reason we started with a fresh fork.
March 14, 2014, 06:01:27 PM
price is dropping
Selling high is only half the battle. Buying low is the other half.
And to win the battle you'll have to not be dreaming when doing the trades.
March 14, 2014, 05:54:14 PM
Volume on Mintpal is CRAZY for a coin this new. Good job Devs!
The major innovation here is the voting... We can forget all the hash function debates, because this is obviously more ASIC resistant than SHA256/Bitcoin, so we can forget quark which is a major overkill anyways. Most importantly there is a decentralized mechanism for control of supply. which is a major innovation and valuable contribution to the crypto world.
Im still buying..
Im still buying..
Thanks to both.
March 14, 2014, 05:51:53 PM
That's already complete nonsense. The developers are just full of crap. Let's say there is a second-preimage attack for BLAKE-512. So am able to compute an input value X, so that BLAKE-512(X) = Y, where Y matches the difficulty and finds a block. If Keccac runs before Blake, I still need to find a l need to find an input Z, so that Keccak(Z) = X.
Furthermore, they claim:
LMFAO. These kids have no clue what they are talking about. In fact, the opposite is true. If one hash function is broken, it's possible to freely choose the corresponding 64 bit in the output. Oh guys, just quit this coin. It's pathetic and an insult to anyone capable of adding 1 and 1.
Did you miss the 'interleaved' word somehow? You need all 4 hashes to have last 4 bits zero to match the target 0x0000FFFF.. I'd suggest just reading the code.
However, using only last 64 bits of each of 4 hashes (and effectively only last 8-10 bits for PoW at current difficulty) kills the math behind their cryptographic security proofs.
The bit interleave part actually has the opposite effect in been ASIC resist. It literally takes zero cost do to fixed bit interleave in ASIC. Been an ASIC designer myself for almost 10 years,I would say this is less effective than dark/quark algorithm in terms of ASIC resist.
Bit interleaving is not used for ASIC nor GPU resistance.
The worst part of bit interleave is that the difficulty target is directly mapped to each hash function, which makes parallel calculation possible and simple. If one of hashes result is less than partial target, the rest calc can be skipped.
If I were to implement this in Fpga, I would do it in 4 stages: hefty1+keccak, sha256, Blake, and groestl. The overall hash-per-sec is determined by hefty1+keccak. Reviewing the source code, my estimation is that complexity of hefty1 is in the same magnitude of sha256. So overall throughput would be similar to sha256. Considering cost of all hashes, 1/10 hash throughput of existing bitcoin Fpga miner is very easy to achieve.
If I were to implement this in Fpga, I would do it in 4 stages: hefty1+keccak, sha256, Blake, and groestl. The overall hash-per-sec is determined by hefty1+keccak. Reviewing the source code, my estimation is that complexity of hefty1 is in the same magnitude of sha256. So overall throughput would be similar to sha256. Considering cost of all hashes, 1/10 hash throughput of existing bitcoin Fpga miner is very easy to achieve.
HEFTY1 should account for ~95% of the runtime, so doing the 4 secure hashes in parallel will only reduce the remaining 5% of the runtime.
March 14, 2014, 05:33:06 PM
The major innovation here is the voting... We can forget all the hash function debates, because this is obviously more "secure" than SHA256/Bitcoin, so we can forget quark which is a major overkill anyways. Most importantly there is a decentralized mechanism for control of supply. which is a major innovation and valuable contribution to the crypto world.
Im still buying..
Im still buying..
March 14, 2014, 05:11:16 PM
That's already complete nonsense. The developers are just full of crap. Let's say there is a second-preimage attack for BLAKE-512. So am able to compute an input value X, so that BLAKE-512(X) = Y, where Y matches the difficulty and finds a block. If Keccac runs before Blake, I still need to find a l need to find an input Z, so that Keccak(Z) = X.
Furthermore, they claim:
LMFAO. These kids have no clue what they are talking about. In fact, the opposite is true. If one hash function is broken, it's possible to freely choose the corresponding 64 bit in the output. Oh guys, just quit this coin. It's pathetic and an insult to anyone capable of adding 1 and 1.
Did you miss the 'interleaved' word somehow? You need all 4 hashes to have last 4 bits zero to match the target 0x0000FFFF.. I'd suggest just reading the code.
However, using only last 64 bits of each of 4 hashes (and effectively only last 8-10 bits for PoW at current difficulty) kills the math behind their cryptographic security proofs.
The bit interleave part actually has the opposite effect in been ASIC resist. It literally takes zero cost do to fixed bit interleave in ASIC. Been an ASIC designer myself for almost 10 years,I would say this is less effective than dark/quark algorithm in terms of ASIC resist.
The worst part of bit interleave is that the difficulty target is directly mapped to each hash function, which makes parallel calculation possible and simple. If one of hashes result is less than partial target, the rest calc can be skipped.
If I were to implement this in Fpga, I would do it in 4 stages: hefty1+keccak, sha256, Blake, and groestl. The overall hash-per-sec is determined by hefty1+keccak. Reviewing the source code, my estimation is that complexity of hefty1 is in the same magnitude of sha256. So overall throughput would be similar to sha256. Considering cost of all hashes, 1/10 hash throughput of existing bitcoin Fpga miner is very easy to achieve.
March 14, 2014, 04:33:24 PM
hi guys
my wallet tells me i'm in a wrong fork
i've been running 1.0 since beginning
any idea ?
my wallet tells me i'm in a wrong fork
i've been running 1.0 since beginning
any idea ?
March 14, 2014, 04:32:45 PM
Volume on Mintpal is CRAZY for a coin this new. Good job Devs!
March 14, 2014, 04:28:09 PM
Number of coins in market.
March 14, 2014, 04:26:42 PM
price is dropping
Selling high is only half the battle. A large chunk of coins was also lost due to a corrupt wallet PW so the float is less than what people think.
Define float ?
March 14, 2014, 04:16:47 PM
price is dropping
Selling high is only half the battle. A large chunk of coins was also lost due to a corrupt wallet PW so the float is less than what people think.
March 14, 2014, 04:09:41 PM
PM me I'll likely send the info out (provided I'm up) before it happens by message. You can tip me some HVC after I say I told you so!! 
March 14, 2014, 04:03:19 PM
Good time to buy. There is a large buy up that will be happening soon. I called it yesterday, before Fontas. Check my posts. When I hear its about to happen I will post as you should buy in before. May not drop to these levels again considering the quantity I hear my contact is planning on acquiring.
March 14, 2014, 03:56:08 PM
price is dropping
Selling high is only half the battle. Jump to: