Topic: [ANN] [ICO] BITBASE Escrow Technology Changing Smart Contracts as Whole - page 27. (Read 103431 times)

It was totally a scam from the start. Gleb exposed lying about the dev team at the beginning and this was also a lie at the bottom of the website:

Crypto Base Ltd Company No. 10825810 London, WC2A 1LF is authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011, for the issuing of electronic money transfer.

Do you really believe he intended to bring out a Visa card too?

are you stupid?

Yakov you do realize a 10:1 swap is instant 3x for coins on coinexchange.io if the new coin ever reaches $1. If it crosses $1 this means even more gain.

Think this over, as one more mistake/dump will completely ruin this coin. Imagine this, the dumpers have an instant 3X just like that if the new coin is at $1+. If the new coin trades at $2, they have 6X gains.

Yakov plz think this over.

hey guys, i need a laugh. please tell me this is not a scam and the coin is going to moon. thanks
 

I am a  member of bitbase community and I bought tokens during the prelaunch sale to the capacity of the amount I had.
I so much believe in this project to point that I could had bought up to 500k during the prelaunch.
But now this is my concern;
I went to coinexchange because I got money by month end and it was the time people were having transfer issues with bitbase internal exchanger.So, if you decide to give me 10%  back from 2058.33 btbc I bought from exchange it will be a great unjust to me personally.
But if you think given 10% back will be your final settlement for those who bought from coinexchange that wouldn't make me not to support your program.
I STILL STAND BY YOU AND  USED MY MONEY TO INVEST IN YOUR PROJECT IT'S MY DECISION.

I think Yakov will now start doing things right and try to solve ALL THE PROBLEMS of the past.
He has already said that he will restore the 50 free btbc to all those who won them by registering. (as was initially promised by signup reward)
I also think that if Yahov want to start doing things right, he will make a 1:1 swap, since those who bought at ICO at low prices and those who bought at exchange at low prices are investors too.
In coinexchange many people sold their coins in lost and others took advantage and bought them, that's not bad, that's how the coin market works.

Many of the investors at the beginning also took advantage and ran out to sell their coins to the coinexchange for values ​​of $ 1, $ 2, $ 3, $ 4 and up to $ 5 and they returned to Bitbase exchange to buy cheap and so they repeated that operation several times.
Those who bought in conexchange have the same coin that were sold at some time in the ICO.
They say that some miners mined and took advantage ... but that should be within the plans, since it was a minable coin and would eventually be mined .. Yakov should not allow more deposits in coinexchange and the miners could not continue sending coins.
An exchange 1 BTBc = 1 Laser would be the best solution and it would start with all the investors happy and talking well about the project. This would solve all the problems and give a clean start.

This project to grow needs the support of ALL. As long as there are dissatisfied people with dishonest swap, or with any other kind of problems, the project will continue dragging problems ... and investors will be harmed. I recommend SWAP 1: 1 and final closure of Bitbase.io.   FRESH START AND EVERYBODY HAPPY!!!

you are just scam admin

Like I said earlier, the BEST Yakov can ever do for this project is being FAIR & being TRUSTWORTHY.

By being FAIR, that is 1:1 ratio distribution of the new coins with the ones on coinexchange. it's price as we speak, is at par with the ones bought at the ico.

The people who bought at ico, just happen to be the first set of investors, the ones who bought at the exchange are the second set of investors, who even happened to have spent more, and bought it ridiculously way higher than the first set of investors, of which I happen to be among. So, why should the first set of buyers be given a preferential treatment? That's wrong if I must point out.

Yakov, if I were you, I would speak to coinexchange to disable Btbc deposits ASAP. This would render the miners and the 'ready to be dumped bag' of Btbc useless. This takes care of your miners coin dumping worries, and would bring sanity to the platform.

By being TRUSTWORTHY, you recently mentioned giving the 50 Btbc to the people who should get it, stick to your word. Make good decisions, stick to them and take actions.

Sure, you were one of those who initially bought cheap on Bitbase exchange and sold them expensive on coinexchange.
And I'm sure you  move many cheap coins from coinexchange to bitbase when everything fell.
Many people bought too at $ 1, $ 2, $ 4 $ 4 and $ 5 in coinexchange ... So 40:1 is fair for you?
I think you are thinking in a very selfish way.
It's like I said, 10: 1 for everyone, including investors and those who bought in echange to compensate losses among all ... that would seem fair to you too?

Yakov I do not understand, if the miners really are the problem, why not talk to coinexchange and close the deposits wallet of BTBc
I really do not understand that.
I also do not understand, if you made a mistake with the code or anything else that happened, that mistake does not have to be paid by the people who bought in coinexchange.
If the problem were only for the miners, those coins would have been mined anyway at any time...
If you want to start doing things right, start with a 1:1 swap. with everyone happy, and the rest, the community will take care that your project works.

$0.3 is next price

They took away my Tokens, 100% fucking scam. Don't fall again for this Folks. I'm pretty sure Yakov holds millions of coins for himself, and when it hits exchange he'll dump all of his coins then walk away.

Absolute SCAM. Stay away from this toxic scamming project!

It's a fair 1: 1 exchange, since at ICO, a lot of people bought at 0.02 too.
Who brought at ICO at $ 0.02, $ 0.30, 0.35, 0.40 and so .. those same people, went to coinexchange and sold them at a loss of 0.03. Some sold them for profit at $ 2, $ 3 and $ 4.
Who bought them in coinexchange did something wrong ...? no, because those coins were bought at some time from Yakov in the ICO at the price of ICO, so do not try to make comparisons with the current price ... compare apples to apples ... and the coins that some may have bought for pennies , someone else bought them at another price. and they are still the same coin .. Only changed the purchase value of the coin by the market (offer and demand ), but the coin is the same.

I Agree!
It is not fair to reward the one who ran to sell them in an exchange and punish whoever bought it in the exchange. That's why I think that to repair the mistakes Yakov have to do a swap 1:1 and start the project well, without anyone losing money.

I think its difficult for any decision to be made on ratios or numbers until the difficulty increases and the number of illicitly mined coins is known.  The key point is that investors are investors regardless of whether they invested on the platform or invested on the exchange. It would be ideal if a fair deal could be worked out based on the dollar value of the coins at time of purchase.  

Well its better than TokenBase which is what I expected after Yakov did CryptoBase and Then BitBase....maybe he figured if it was called TokenBase we would all immediately know it was another scam coin.

Yakov, I congratulate you on that decision!! It shows that you have started thinking well.
This is not about the 50 free coins, this is about the word and trust.
You must work for your platform to grow. Every decision you make directly affects your investors, whether they bought in ICO or in Exchange. Nobody is to blame for believing in your coin and buying it. Believe me, there are no 2 BTBc coins, one of the exchanges and another one of the platform .. all the coins is the same and you should make a swap with all the coins 1:1. That would be the right thing to do and that would show that if you want to do things right and that would avoid a lot of problems if you run a new website, because if there are any investors who feel scammed, it will report you and believe that you do not want to have that kind of problems that would also become problems for your investors.
Now you have the opportunity to start doing things right ... the decision is in your hands!

i really hope this new coin can be a success.really invested a fortune in bitbase and lost virtually all. i hope the new plan also favours those that bought on coinexchange

I sent an amount, it's the 3rd still nothing received... fuckin pending, fuckin scam, i hope you will burn in hell with our money 

There were also people who bought in ico at $ 0.02 and that is not ridiculous..?
I think that no matter where people buy, the coin will always be the same and the one that generates it too. The one that generates a coin automatically and legally becomes money issuer and is responsible for it .. now he believe that making another coin, it allows abandon the previous one without problems nor responsibilities, and leaving the promises of the project truncated.. those promises were for which investors also bought in Coinexchange. When Yakov sees that his game is taking a direction that is not convenient, he changes it to his favor inventing new rules and putting amazing excuses. that is not professional. The people that bought in exchanges or in ico, bought for the project that was behind, not for the form or the name of the coin that in itself are not worth anything .. all those people who buy and support the project, now he tell them that maybe he could swap their coin but he would take away 90% ... that is ridiculous ...
I think that many investors would not like to lose their money and start reporting this actions like fraud.
Unfortunately I see that this project already fails, the person in charge does not know how to manage a project of that size and create new rule on the fly at every moment.. it is not reliable at all.
With this type of actions, the only thing that can be expected at the end of the lending, change the rules again, issue another currency and swap them 10: 1 for the new one inventing a hack or other problem as you have seen ...