I dunno why ppl keep asking for translations right now. Most translated pages do not actually attract ppl. Bounties for nothing.
it is sad((
Topic: [ANN] [ICO CLOSED] Inchain - insurance for the crypto economy - page 93. (Read 109157 times)
September 30, 2016, 04:43:55 AM
it is sad((
September 30, 2016, 04:43:17 AM
We have no video about Inchain yet. I think a video like this as a good idea, but at this moment we do not have resources to record it.
But I can record a "home" (joke) video on my kitchen where you can see me and my opinion about Inchain.
thats kind of a concerning comment,t hat you dont have the resources/ability to even make a video recording explaining what the concept is and how it would work?
So, we have many another sources where is many info about Inchain and about how it works:
Our PRE ANN post
ANN post
Website
Blog
Whitepaper in OP
Financial model in OP
Presentation on our website
Some amount of publications about project:
September 30, 2016, 03:57:11 AM
Also an easy thought comes to my mind, what will prevent inchain to run away?
Until the end of ICO they have escrow. when platform will be reliased, all money transfers to/from Insurance fund will be under control of Inchain token holders.
September 29, 2016, 08:08:58 PM
I dunno why ppl keep asking for translations right now. Most translated pages do not actually attract ppl. Bounties for nothing.
September 29, 2016, 06:58:16 PM
We have no video about Inchain yet. I think a video like this as a good idea, but at this moment we do not have resources to record it.
But I can record a "home" (joke) video on my kitchen where you can see me and my opinion about Inchain.
thats kind of a concerning comment,t hat you dont have the resources/ability to even make a video recording explaining what the concept is and how it would work?
September 29, 2016, 01:30:30 PM
Well, as i mentionned above, each member of the team recording a video, presenting himself, showing papers proving who he is.
Give to your investors the possibility to cause you real problems if you scam and run away. This is how i can trust you for real, supporting Inchain and not investing only a few pennies in the project.
Not a single investor would have the possibility to cause problem to a team which did the job, and finally failed, but still have been honest and transparent.
Inchain is far different from other projects, and may last years, if it fits to conjuncture, business evolution, keep going under a reasonable management.
Many legit projects didn't see their team loosing anonymity, they finally all paid the price... a crazy project not meeting the success it should have had, a failed ICO not gathering enough of funds to keep the project running...
Inchain is different, that's i guess going up to that step shouldn't be a problem.
I really wish Inchain team will be transparent, for the project to be successful and solving a large problem existing in this sphere.
Give to your investors the possibility to cause you real problems if you scam and run away. This is how i can trust you for real, supporting Inchain and not investing only a few pennies in the project.
Not a single investor would have the possibility to cause problem to a team which did the job, and finally failed, but still have been honest and transparent.
Inchain is far different from other projects, and may last years, if it fits to conjuncture, business evolution, keep going under a reasonable management.
Many legit projects didn't see their team loosing anonymity, they finally all paid the price... a crazy project not meeting the success it should have had, a failed ICO not gathering enough of funds to keep the project running...
Inchain is different, that's i guess going up to that step shouldn't be a problem.
I really wish Inchain team will be transparent, for the project to be successful and solving a large problem existing in this sphere.
Ok, I will discuss it with other team members.
Just remember any questions are welcomed.
Hi,
Did Inchain team eventually decided to loose anonymity?
Such a video would give credibility your projects, and it might also be useful to give your version of Elephant mess up.
You even may go further with some kind of questions/answer stream.
But hosting a live Q&A is always a good move.
A youtube /Google hangout will be the best, Decloud team just dissapear with investors fund yesterday and are no where to be found, this issue needs to be resolved before the ICO commence. Developers should come out and stop hiding under antonymous.
Ok, let's do that in the first half of next week.
September 29, 2016, 01:27:50 PM
Hi, op, may I translate Chinese OP for you?
Hi, ty for the response. We really need Chinese translation. Could you pls show us some examples of your translation? If so, pm me pls.
September 29, 2016, 12:42:41 PM
Hi, op, may I translate Chinese OP for you?
You can check, translation campaign participants to register in here
https://medium.com/@inchain/translation-campaign-details-448afa21179b#.ujuouj5dz
September 29, 2016, 12:31:38 PM
Hi, op, may I translate Chinese OP for you?
September 29, 2016, 12:20:54 PM
I hope Inchain = ICONOMI round2 
me too, or even better than Iconomi. maybe
September 29, 2016, 10:50:40 AM
Well, as i mentionned above, each member of the team recording a video, presenting himself, showing papers proving who he is.
Give to your investors the possibility to cause you real problems if you scam and run away. This is how i can trust you for real, supporting Inchain and not investing only a few pennies in the project.
Not a single investor would have the possibility to cause problem to a team which did the job, and finally failed, but still have been honest and transparent.
Inchain is far different from other projects, and may last years, if it fits to conjuncture, business evolution, keep going under a reasonable management.
Many legit projects didn't see their team loosing anonymity, they finally all paid the price... a crazy project not meeting the success it should have had, a failed ICO not gathering enough of funds to keep the project running...
Inchain is different, that's i guess going up to that step shouldn't be a problem.
I really wish Inchain team will be transparent, for the project to be successful and solving a large problem existing in this sphere.
Give to your investors the possibility to cause you real problems if you scam and run away. This is how i can trust you for real, supporting Inchain and not investing only a few pennies in the project.
Not a single investor would have the possibility to cause problem to a team which did the job, and finally failed, but still have been honest and transparent.
Inchain is far different from other projects, and may last years, if it fits to conjuncture, business evolution, keep going under a reasonable management.
Many legit projects didn't see their team loosing anonymity, they finally all paid the price... a crazy project not meeting the success it should have had, a failed ICO not gathering enough of funds to keep the project running...
Inchain is different, that's i guess going up to that step shouldn't be a problem.
I really wish Inchain team will be transparent, for the project to be successful and solving a large problem existing in this sphere.
Ok, I will discuss it with other team members.
Just remember any questions are welcomed.
Hi,
Did Inchain team eventually decided to loose anonymity?
Such a video would give credibility your projects, and it might also be useful to give your version of Elephant mess up.
You even may go further with some kind of questions/answer stream.
But hosting a live Q&A is always a good move.
A youtube /Google hangout will be the best, Decloud team just dissapear with investors fund yesterday and are no where to be found, this issue needs to be resolved before the ICO commence. Developers should come out and stop hiding under antonymous.
September 29, 2016, 10:22:12 AM
Translation is hard if you don`t understand or read English, google translation sometimes help but not that accurate and need a little bit of editing some nationality understand, write, speak, read english like a second language to them that english does not need to be translated to them.
enough with the bounty, if there is any bloggers around here please publish an article about this coin so it can get exposure outside the forum.
enough with the bounty, if there is any bloggers around here please publish an article about this coin so it can get exposure outside the forum.
September 29, 2016, 10:08:42 AM
would be fairer if the bounty for signature to get more than a translator because the translator only made one post while the signature must be made 50 post until the end of the ico. 
You want to set more for 50 low quality posts (most of signature campaign memebers do so) than for translating pre ann, ann and 7 pages of whitepaper. really? September 29, 2016, 06:03:28 AM
but I see you already have a Chinese OP.
It's declined, look at Status column in gdoc
September 29, 2016, 05:59:39 AM
would be fairer if the bounty for signature to get more than a translator because the translator only made one post while the signature must be made 50 post until the end of the ico.
You want to set more for 50 low quality posts (most of signature campaign memebers do so) than for translating pre ann, ann and 7 pages of whitepaper. really? September 29, 2016, 05:58:43 AM
LOL, ICN is iconomi, INC is inchain, they are different project...
I only compare
Guys, if we talk about a bounty campaigns then we are looking for a good Chinese translator.
Where are you?))
I know a good Chinese translator, but I see you already have a Chinese OP.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1upkIGm3giNKmke90TrKrtyqEkakjPnb0LPnoQhLVCvk/edit#gid=444573468
September 29, 2016, 05:54:53 AM
LOL, ICN is iconomi, INC is inchain, they are different project...
I only compare
Guys, if we talk about a bounty campaigns then we are looking for a good Chinese translator.
Where are you?))
September 29, 2016, 05:45:31 AM
LOL, ICN is iconomi, INC is inchain, they are different project...
I only compare
September 29, 2016, 05:42:21 AM
I see no error in the division of bounty, bounty for translators and bounty for the signature campaign reversed.
would be fairer if the bounty for signature to get more than a translator because the translator only made one post while the signature must be made 50 post until the end of the ico.
would be fairer if the bounty for signature to get more than a translator because the translator only made one post while the signature must be made 50 post until the end of the ico.
LOL, ICN is iconomi, INC is inchain, they are different project...
September 29, 2016, 05:39:48 AM
I see no error in the division of bounty, bounty for translators and bounty for the signature campaign reversed.
would be fairer if the bounty for signature to get more than a translator because the translator only made one post while the signature must be made 50 post until the end of the ico.
would be fairer if the bounty for signature to get more than a translator because the translator only made one post while the signature must be made 50 post until the end of the ico.
Jump to: