Good question! Is there a minimum cap? And if yes, is it already achieved?
About the second question I think there was nothing stated in the whitepaper about a dividend for token holders in long term. But maybe I have missed this part.
No dividends as far as I cold see. They would run into the SEC unfortunately.
Will this shouldn't be a problem at all. I mean as more people are using the services, as much more value the coin would become.
That is when the project gets a widespread support, which is not so tough seeing the basic idea and team details of Vibehub. The VR industry is only good in first world countries and if it gets into all then we may see a huge success.
The issue with dividend and SEC is not just based on widespread support but ensuring that the dev delivers on the proposed idea. If for any reason vibe has a hiccup and investors feel jaded, that could open them up to been sued by the SEC.
Believe me, we are going to deliver on every word. We are working on something very big behind the scenes right now and will hopefully have this deal done before the ICO is finished. If not VibeHub will be the most undervalued currency in all of crypto, at this point we already are in my opinion.
The SEC is going after people like looq.io who are outright scams or paying attention to the big players like eos and ensure everything up to their standard. There is simply just too many ICO's and not enough man power to actually investigate all of them.
I personally believe the SEC would find VibeHub a breath of fresh air in the ICO market, A devoted team who is extremely active in the community and more importantly a ICO that is not just words on paper. We actually have working betas , SEC is going after malicious ICOs, not projects like VibeHub
Well, that still doesn't answer the question about the dividend. So from your post regarding SEC, are we to stipulate that vibeX holder will get dividends from the VibeHUB?