3. Tokens that pay dividends!
...
Most POS coins pay %of share per year without risk of trading,
Supernodes pay for supernode , minig shares for minnig.
There is a difference between dividends and POS.
There will be 100m ICN tokens forever. When you do POS number of tokens grow.
Selecting Ethereum as your token's platform instead of running your own network was smart, taking into account your operating needs.
However, you seem to be too optimistic about ETH itself (see quotes from your whitepaper below)
-security and predictability - don't forget the DAO (security), and hardfork (predictability) - obviously the DAO wasn't directly ETH's fault, but the idea of smart contracts on Ethereum platform seems to be quite complex even for experienced developers. And the HF for bailout, and not for any technical resolution, is just clear econo-politics.
-use of robust and well- supported clients - working with Mist is not that robust for an ordinary user
-high liquidity - ETH is liquid indeed but what will be your advantage from this?
-Ethereum smart contracts enable a very transparent and secure way of profitsharing among the token holders - no thank you, the word "secure" is so improper here
AND
Exactly what will be inevitable... to lose money the same way DAO lost money?
Comments like that without even reading the FAQ is like texting in traffic while driving... REKT
Mr. Bitbanksky, also... The DAO sidechain code was responsible for the smart contract exploit, not ETH code.
The statements made about it are irrelevant and unrelated because the tokens don't interact via smart contract.
Ethereum could literally vaporize and all the holdings barring ETH would be perfectly safe.
If there's going to be a similar DAO-like attack in the future (wasn't that a "feature" in the DAO code that was exploited?), Vitalik and friends from ETH foundation will just do another fork of ETH, right? Lol