Your Bounties
CLAIM WAS SUCCESSFUL
Then how do they distributed tokens, on the ico website will appear Fiture add wallet?
Topic: [ANN] ICONOMI - Fund Management Platform - page 910. (Read 1253951 times)
How do you get your ICN out from the website? Can we just send to exch as soon as it's live on anything??
I think yes. we can send our ICN direct to exchange site.But probably ICN will launch with a little delay AFIK.so we need to wait
How do you get your ICN out from the website? Can we just send to exch as soon as it's live on anything??
hi guys is this legit they are trading ICN atm?
No it's not legit.
hi guys is this legit they are trading ICN atm?
October 11th or thereabouts 
hi guys is this legit they are trading ICN atm?
What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
I disagree. All icn holders will have profits from the perforance fund as thats where the overfunding goes.
Its just locked in so you gain by your icn having more income giving it a higher market value.
ICN holders will have profit from ALL funds on the platform, in a form of fees collected - this is the main idea of the ICO. Since we "over-funded" the platform, and since this over-funded money came directly from us - we should have the ability to liquid it just like every other fund that we or anybody else will invest into.
Still haven't seen a valid argument against that last sentence
How does that make sense?
The dividends are paid every week ... THAT is the ONLY extent of "withdrawal" of seed funding from the PF, at the rate of 20% APR.
PF participants simply buy tokens equaling a share of profits from said funds, adding or subtracting to that pot under a separate formulae. (yet to be revealed) This stops a PF buyer to be able to withdraw seed funding, and at the same time, increases the chances the fund will grow at a much faster rate, bringing more profits to PF token holders and more dividends to ICN token holders.
What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
Because thats what iconomi said they will do. I dont make the rules, but that is how it has been decided.
Overfunding is locked in giving icn more value.
Future funding needs to be able to be liquidated or who would invest?
Mr P is correct. Seems we do agree. Iconomi said in this thread that overfunding wont be shares in fund given out to us but held in the fund with us profit sharing.
Hopefully bounties will not issue quickly and to everyone else it will negatively affect the value of ICN
tomorrow is the date for bounty distribution.so obviously bounty will be issued first.And ICO participants will get their tokens after 3 days.but all have an equal chance to use their tokens on first priority because ICN will be listed after the end of token distribution. What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
I disagree. All icn holders will have profits from the perforance fund as thats where the overfunding goes.
Its just locked in so you gain by your icn having more income giving it a higher market value.
ICN holders will have profit from ALL funds on the platform, in a form of fees collected - this is the main idea of the ICO. Since we "over-funded" the platform, and since this over-funded money came directly from us - we should have the ability to liquid it just like every other fund that we or anybody else will invest into.
Still haven't seen a valid argument against that last sentence
How does that make sense?
What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
I disagree. All icn holders will have profits from the perforance fund as thats where the overfunding goes.
Its just locked in so you gain by your icn having more income giving it a higher market value.
ICN holders will have profit from ALL funds on the platform, in a form of fees collected - this is the main idea of the ICO. Since we "over-funded" the platform, and since this over-funded money came directly from us - we should have the ability to liquid it just like every other fund that we or anybody else will invest into.
Still haven't seen a valid argument against that last sentence
How does that make sense?
Hopefully bounties will not issue quickly and to everyone else it will negatively affect the value of ICN
I have done the procedure for bounty.what about the unqualified bounty stake if some people failed to confirm their bounty?are you thinking to distribute those token among the qualified participants?or it remains into dev fund?
thank you
thank you
ICONOMI said that they will distribute the unclaimed bounties, yes.
What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
I disagree. All icn holders will have profits from the perforance fund as thats where the overfunding goes.
Its just locked in so you gain by your icn having more income giving it a higher market value.
ICN holders will have profit from ALL funds on the platform, in a form of fees collected - this is the main idea of the ICO. Since we "over-funded" the platform, and since this over-funded money came directly from us - we should have the ability to liquid it just like every other fund that we or anybody else will invest into.
Still haven't seen a valid argument against that last sentence
How does that make sense?
What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
I disagree. All icn holders will have profits from the perforance fund as thats where the overfunding goes.
Its just locked in so you gain by your icn having more income giving it a higher market value.
ICN holders will have profit from ALL funds on the platform, in a form of fees collected - this is the main idea of the ICO. Since we "over-funded" the platform, and since this over-funded money came directly from us - we should have the ability to liquid it just like every other fund that we or anybody else will invest into.
Still haven't seen a valid argument against that last sentence
If you wish to sell a PF token, you must buy one first. Then, there will be a withdraw delay of 5 days (or similar) when you choose to.
What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
Because thats what iconomi said they will do. I dont make the rules, but that is how it has been decided.
Overfunding is locked in giving icn more value.
Future funding needs to be able to be liquidated or who would invest?
What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
I disagree. All icn holders will have profits from the perforance fund as thats where the overfunding goes.
Its just locked in so you gain by your icn having more income giving it a higher market value.
What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
I disagree. All icn holders will have profits from the perforance fund as thats where the overfunding goes.
Its just locked in so you gain by your icn having more income giving it a higher market value.
ICN holders will have profit from ALL funds on the platform, in a form of fees collected - this is the main idea of the ICO. Since we "over-funded" the platform, and since this over-funded money came directly from us - we should have the ability to liquid it just like every other fund that we or anybody else will invest into.
Still haven't seen a valid argument against that last sentence
What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
Because thats what iconomi said they will do. I dont make the rules, but that is how it has been decided.
Overfunding is locked in giving icn more value.
Future funding needs to be able to be liquidated or who would invest?
What am I missing here?
Initial overfunding is locked giving us/ icn holders as a group shares in the fund causing icn to gain value as a token.
Future funding would give the investors shares in that fund that could be liquidated when you choose.
Thats how i see it working.
I disagree. All icn holders will have profits from the perforance fund as thats where the overfunding goes.
Its just locked in so you gain by your icn having more income giving it a higher market value.
Jump to: