Through long-term mining statistics, plus subsidies from the fund, at least 10,000 IFC earn a week.
This is a considerable income.
The good news is that, in theory, the more active the chain transactions are, the higher the mining returns will be.
If this model continues to develop, the foundation of IFC will be better and better.
Topic: [ANN] INFINITECOIN - UPDATE TO 1.8.8 visit INFINITECOIN.COM - page 73. (Read 155187 times)
IFC is just like Doge, it may need some technical upgrades but other than that it works just fine. I have been holding some IFC since 2012 and will continue to do so.
One problem that I see is we need more miners. The more different miners, the smaller the chances of 51% attacks. But this goes for every crypto. This is not something that IFC suffers from alone. If support for BitcoinCash would drop severely then it would also be easy to attack that is someone wanted to do harm. In the end 51% attacks cost a lot of power (money) to do and the return isn't that great.
One more thing is that IFC doesn't have a real team so there are multiple wallets out there that people don't trust. I still use 1.8.8
To succeed more you need people actively talking about IFC on Twitter etc. That's where all the crypto people are today. I don't know anyone else (in person) that uses BitcoinTalk even though I still like it.
I think 1.9.1.8 version is really useful, is not in the C: disk storage block data, can be a random other disk, don't worry about the computer damage wallet file, and moved around is more convenient! You can try to use it! One problem that I see is we need more miners. The more different miners, the smaller the chances of 51% attacks. But this goes for every crypto. This is not something that IFC suffers from alone. If support for BitcoinCash would drop severely then it would also be easy to attack that is someone wanted to do harm. In the end 51% attacks cost a lot of power (money) to do and the return isn't that great.
One more thing is that IFC doesn't have a real team so there are multiple wallets out there that people don't trust. I still use 1.8.8
To succeed more you need people actively talking about IFC on Twitter etc. That's where all the crypto people are today. I don't know anyone else (in person) that uses BitcoinTalk even though I still like it.
How are you concerned about increasing IFC's reach over people in the whole world? Are there any faucets?
Safeguard your own node, let more IFC fans think of IFC open wallet have connection again, looking forward to them! 
No.46 8/25/2019 One person a mining plan (electricity subsidy)
discord：https://discord.gg/3Qq2neb
telegram：https://t.me/ifc123
infinitecoin (IFC) Mining fund
BTC： 34ScXu4Lqv8SWpXd5nKj9S6R1ed3Ht5gqU
LTC: MC2JeAJvhEqiLjvCVyNnRfygvxXF7So4K2
IFC: iQ43RacKhkWKL2wTZAirVPr8oNN7HAp9JY
DOGE：DRaYeNxY2UgKKJ3xJugBcDtAAoZJicsFs5
Account administrator: msy2008
Special purpose: cultivate more mining talents and increase the number of mining people
Blockchain Explorer
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ifc/
IFC POOL
wxbkc.com:9391 Zhejiang Telecom Manager：无耳艮币 Mine mark：iPoPFp2w89Jdis2LEKe8Ng42QHGt6v2ksy （Linux1.9.1.8）
ifcf2pool.com:9391 Anhui Telecom Manager：lijian2019 Mine mark：i6FRBUjfJmFPEKHgcyQ7BRmDWdPk1hAdCR （Linux1.9.1.8）
amxpool.com:9391 Shanghai Telecom Manager：msy2008 Mine mark：iKUaxTQiBbRHCSnbfFHdvbTzozwFFuJeuy（Linux1.9.1.8）
Maintaining the interests of miners is to safeguard the interests of the community
Fee reform is a major turning point for infinitecoin. I hope that every community member should use a newer wallet with a more reasonable billing.
Please upgrade all your wallet to 1.9.1.8
The modification fee is changed from the original package size to 0.2% according to the transfer amount, up to 10,000 IFC, and the minimum 0.01 IFC charge.
1.9.1.8 Author:WilliamXu1 (Without internal links）
Wallet download
https://github.com/WilliamXuu/infinitecoin/releases
Source code
https://github.com/WilliamXuu/infinitecoin
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1.9.1.0 and 1.9.1.4 Author:yiluyouni （Links in wallets are unauthorized）
Wallet download
https://github.com/withu2018/infinitecoin/releases
Source code
https://github.com/withu2018/infinitecoin
discord：https://discord.gg/3Qq2neb
telegram：https://t.me/ifc123
infinitecoin (IFC) Mining fund
BTC： 34ScXu4Lqv8SWpXd5nKj9S6R1ed3Ht5gqU
LTC: MC2JeAJvhEqiLjvCVyNnRfygvxXF7So4K2
IFC: iQ43RacKhkWKL2wTZAirVPr8oNN7HAp9JY
DOGE：DRaYeNxY2UgKKJ3xJugBcDtAAoZJicsFs5
Account administrator: msy2008
Special purpose: cultivate more mining talents and increase the number of mining people
Blockchain Explorer
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ifc/
IFC POOL
wxbkc.com:9391 Zhejiang Telecom Manager：无耳艮币 Mine mark：iPoPFp2w89Jdis2LEKe8Ng42QHGt6v2ksy （Linux1.9.1.8）
ifcf2pool.com:9391 Anhui Telecom Manager：lijian2019 Mine mark：i6FRBUjfJmFPEKHgcyQ7BRmDWdPk1hAdCR （Linux1.9.1.8）
amxpool.com:9391 Shanghai Telecom Manager：msy2008 Mine mark：iKUaxTQiBbRHCSnbfFHdvbTzozwFFuJeuy（Linux1.9.1.8）
Maintaining the interests of miners is to safeguard the interests of the community
Fee reform is a major turning point for infinitecoin. I hope that every community member should use a newer wallet with a more reasonable billing.
Please upgrade all your wallet to 1.9.1.8
The modification fee is changed from the original package size to 0.2% according to the transfer amount, up to 10,000 IFC, and the minimum 0.01 IFC charge.
1.9.1.8 Author:WilliamXu1 (Without internal links）
Wallet download
https://github.com/WilliamXuu/infinitecoin/releases
Source code
https://github.com/WilliamXuu/infinitecoin
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1.9.1.0 and 1.9.1.4 Author:yiluyouni （Links in wallets are unauthorized）
Wallet download
https://github.com/withu2018/infinitecoin/releases
Source code
https://github.com/withu2018/infinitecoin
The Chinese community has upgraded the IFC infinite Coin Wallet to version 1.9.1.8, removed the embedded links, version 1.9.1.8 is suitable for international applications, this is very good, I switched the node to version 1.9.1.8, feel very beautiful!!
Six years old currency reappeared in the forum.
Infinite Copper, Renaissance Road Community Initiated "One Man One Miner Project"
MSY2008 processing and production of the fifth batch of mining machines, one after another in shipment,
The old currency infrastructure construction is several years late, hopefully IFC will become the mainstream!
I have started mining for ifc for a week. Although there are not many coins I have dug, I think it may be more valuable in the future than I am now. I am very glad that I am also a miner of ifc. Infinite Copper, Renaissance Road Community Initiated "One Man One Miner Project"
MSY2008 processing and production of the fifth batch of mining machines, one after another in shipment,
The old currency infrastructure construction is several years late, hopefully IFC will become the mainstream!
IFC is just like Doge, it may need some technical upgrades but other than that it works just fine. I have been holding some IFC since 2012 and will continue to do so.
One problem that I see is we need more miners. The more different miners, the smaller the chances of 51% attacks. But this goes for every crypto. This is not something that IFC suffers from alone. If support for BitcoinCash would drop severely then it would also be easy to attack that is someone wanted to do harm. In the end 51% attacks cost a lot of power (money) to do and the return isn't that great.
One more thing is that IFC doesn't have a real team so there are multiple wallets out there that people don't trust. I still use 1.8.8
To succeed more you need people actively talking about IFC on Twitter etc. That's where all the crypto people are today. I don't know anyone else (in person) that uses BitcoinTalk even though I still like it.
We are always there, the Chinese community has been building the foundation, we need your support! One problem that I see is we need more miners. The more different miners, the smaller the chances of 51% attacks. But this goes for every crypto. This is not something that IFC suffers from alone. If support for BitcoinCash would drop severely then it would also be easy to attack that is someone wanted to do harm. In the end 51% attacks cost a lot of power (money) to do and the return isn't that great.
One more thing is that IFC doesn't have a real team so there are multiple wallets out there that people don't trust. I still use 1.8.8
To succeed more you need people actively talking about IFC on Twitter etc. That's where all the crypto people are today. I don't know anyone else (in person) that uses BitcoinTalk even though I still like it.
IFC is just like Doge, it may need some technical upgrades but other than that it works just fine. I have been holding some IFC since 2012 and will continue to do so.
One problem that I see is we need more miners. The more different miners, the smaller the chances of 51% attacks. But this goes for every crypto. This is not something that IFC suffers from alone. If support for BitcoinCash would drop severely then it would also be easy to attack that is someone wanted to do harm. In the end 51% attacks cost a lot of power (money) to do and the return isn't that great.
One more thing is that IFC doesn't have a real team so there are multiple wallets out there that people don't trust. I still use 1.8.8
To succeed more you need people actively talking about IFC on Twitter etc. That's where all the crypto people are today. I don't know anyone else (in person) that uses BitcoinTalk even though I still like it.
Which version of the wallet is the user's free choice, since everyone knows the importance of developing miners, then we should support the 1.9.1.8 version of the wallet, because the 1.88 version of the wallet fee is no longer suitable for IFC, without block awards, while the 1.9.1.8 version of the wallet charges 2/1000 of the handling fee to the majority of miners, 1.9.1.8 version is more conducive to the development of miners. Although my2008 has encountered some resistance in implementing the one-person-one-mute mining machine program in the Chinese community, it has achieved certain results, the number of miners is increasing, and the consensus is also expanding! One problem that I see is we need more miners. The more different miners, the smaller the chances of 51% attacks. But this goes for every crypto. This is not something that IFC suffers from alone. If support for BitcoinCash would drop severely then it would also be easy to attack that is someone wanted to do harm. In the end 51% attacks cost a lot of power (money) to do and the return isn't that great.
One more thing is that IFC doesn't have a real team so there are multiple wallets out there that people don't trust. I still use 1.8.8
To succeed more you need people actively talking about IFC on Twitter etc. That's where all the crypto people are today. I don't know anyone else (in person) that uses BitcoinTalk even though I still like it.
IFC is just like Doge, it may need some technical upgrades but other than that it works just fine. I have been holding some IFC since 2012 and will continue to do so.
One problem that I see is we need more miners. The more different miners, the smaller the chances of 51% attacks. But this goes for every crypto. This is not something that IFC suffers from alone. If support for BitcoinCash would drop severely then it would also be easy to attack that is someone wanted to do harm. In the end 51% attacks cost a lot of power (money) to do and the return isn't that great.
One more thing is that IFC doesn't have a real team so there are multiple wallets out there that people don't trust. I still use 1.8.8
To succeed more you need people actively talking about IFC on Twitter etc. That's where all the crypto people are today. I don't know anyone else (in person) that uses BitcoinTalk even though I still like it.
One problem that I see is we need more miners. The more different miners, the smaller the chances of 51% attacks. But this goes for every crypto. This is not something that IFC suffers from alone. If support for BitcoinCash would drop severely then it would also be easy to attack that is someone wanted to do harm. In the end 51% attacks cost a lot of power (money) to do and the return isn't that great.
One more thing is that IFC doesn't have a real team so there are multiple wallets out there that people don't trust. I still use 1.8.8
To succeed more you need people actively talking about IFC on Twitter etc. That's where all the crypto people are today. I don't know anyone else (in person) that uses BitcoinTalk even though I still like it.
IFC is receiving more and more attention to show that the charm of the POW currency is endless, and there is no way out for a POS without consensus.
I want to ask a lot of block reward from ifc mining?
Pleasantly surprised! Today, there are very old version 1.8.6 wallet nodes in the node list. I don't know which epic player appeared? 
http://a3.qpic.cn/psb?/c67e428a-707d-4cd6-b804-b6c6286d5171/.acu1*rNb6YGIKgTypeg86XuAHOfwuaHo02UgrzYWAg!/b/dLYAAAAAAAAA&ek=1&kp=1&pt=0&bo=zAK5AQAAAAADF0Q!&tl=1&vuin=4825368&tm=1566280800&sce=60-2-2&rf=viewer_4
Wow! A very old old wallet, can you see how many IFC coins? http://a3.qpic.cn/psb?/c67e428a-707d-4cd6-b804-b6c6286d5171/.acu1*rNb6YGIKgTypeg86XuAHOfwuaHo02UgrzYWAg!/b/dLYAAAAAAAAA&ek=1&kp=1&pt=0&bo=zAK5AQAAAAADF0Q!&tl=1&vuin=4825368&tm=1566280800&sce=60-2-2&rf=viewer_4
Hello, friends of bitcointalk, founder of IFC and community founder.
I'm a developer of 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 wallet programs. Since the development of 1.9.1 wallet, I've made the code public in GitHub and applied for merging it into the main warehouse.
I think infinite currency is good. I think that if infinite currency can be upgraded continuously from its creation to now, there will be no BCH or other currencies.
Recently in bitcointalk, I was portrayed by some people as a cheater and a splitter. And these people are using my wallet program and my improved IFC p2pool program. Recently, I also shared the built IFC compiler environment virtual machine with the people who smeared me.
As a developer, I am not good at social interaction, for human nature, always with goodwill, but was dismantled across the river, malicious smear, I feel very sad. Tecshare did not reply to my private letters, and even sent them to see, which made me sadder.
I don't accuse these people. Since December 2017, when I joined the community, I have been doing things in the sunshine. From IFC, I haven't got any benefits or benefits. Even buying IFC cost me tens of thousands of dollars. My persistence, on the one hand, is to look at the characteristics of unlimited money, on the other hand, is to strive to reduce their losses and friends.
Please stop your malicious slander. If you doubt me, please check the source code yourself.
If you know the technology, you can see it clearly. If you don't understand it, please shut up.
Don't show off your ignorance in front of the whole world.
github: https://github.com/withu2018/infinitecoin/tree/dev
----
中文
bitcointalk的朋友、IFC的创始人和前社区创始人，你们好。
我是1.9.1和1.9.2钱包程序的开发者，从开发1.9.1钱包我就将代码公开在github，而且也申请过合并到主仓库的请求。
我看好无限币，我认为，无限币从创建至今如果能够一直进行技术升级，现在也就不会有BCH之类的币存在。
最近在bitcointalk，有一些人将我描绘为骗子、分裂者。而这些人正用着我开发的钱包程序，用着我改进的IFC p2pool程序。最近，我还将搭建好的IFC编译环境虚拟机分享给了这些抹黑我的人。
作为开发者，我不擅长社交，对于人性，始终抱着善意，但却被过河拆桥，被恶意抹黑，我感到很伤心。Tecshare不回复我的私信，甚至还将私信发给这些人看，让我更伤心。
我不指控这些人，从2017年12月，加入社区，我做事情一直站在阳光底下，从IFC，我没有得到任何好处和利益。甚至买了IFC反倒让我亏损上万元。我的坚持，一方面是看好无限币的特性，另一方面也是努力让自己和朋友减少损失。
请停止你的恶意中伤，对我有怀疑的，请自己查看源码。
你懂技术，就去看清楚，不懂，请闭上嘴。
别在全世界人面前炫耀你的无知。
github: https://github.com/withu2018/infinitecoin/tree/dev
I'm a developer of 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 wallet programs. Since the development of 1.9.1 wallet, I've made the code public in GitHub and applied for merging it into the main warehouse.
I think infinite currency is good. I think that if infinite currency can be upgraded continuously from its creation to now, there will be no BCH or other currencies.
Recently in bitcointalk, I was portrayed by some people as a cheater and a splitter. And these people are using my wallet program and my improved IFC p2pool program. Recently, I also shared the built IFC compiler environment virtual machine with the people who smeared me.
As a developer, I am not good at social interaction, for human nature, always with goodwill, but was dismantled across the river, malicious smear, I feel very sad. Tecshare did not reply to my private letters, and even sent them to see, which made me sadder.
I don't accuse these people. Since December 2017, when I joined the community, I have been doing things in the sunshine. From IFC, I haven't got any benefits or benefits. Even buying IFC cost me tens of thousands of dollars. My persistence, on the one hand, is to look at the characteristics of unlimited money, on the other hand, is to strive to reduce their losses and friends.
Please stop your malicious slander. If you doubt me, please check the source code yourself.
If you know the technology, you can see it clearly. If you don't understand it, please shut up.
Don't show off your ignorance in front of the whole world.
github: https://github.com/withu2018/infinitecoin/tree/dev
----
中文
bitcointalk的朋友、IFC的创始人和前社区创始人，你们好。
我是1.9.1和1.9.2钱包程序的开发者，从开发1.9.1钱包我就将代码公开在github，而且也申请过合并到主仓库的请求。
我看好无限币，我认为，无限币从创建至今如果能够一直进行技术升级，现在也就不会有BCH之类的币存在。
最近在bitcointalk，有一些人将我描绘为骗子、分裂者。而这些人正用着我开发的钱包程序，用着我改进的IFC p2pool程序。最近，我还将搭建好的IFC编译环境虚拟机分享给了这些抹黑我的人。
作为开发者，我不擅长社交，对于人性，始终抱着善意，但却被过河拆桥，被恶意抹黑，我感到很伤心。Tecshare不回复我的私信，甚至还将私信发给这些人看，让我更伤心。
我不指控这些人，从2017年12月，加入社区，我做事情一直站在阳光底下，从IFC，我没有得到任何好处和利益。甚至买了IFC反倒让我亏损上万元。我的坚持，一方面是看好无限币的特性，另一方面也是努力让自己和朋友减少损失。
请停止你的恶意中伤，对我有怀疑的，请自己查看源码。
你懂技术，就去看清楚，不懂，请闭上嘴。
别在全世界人面前炫耀你的无知。
github: https://github.com/withu2018/infinitecoin/tree/dev
You'll be nothing without a miner, msy2008 often says this.
If you haven't yet understood how important miners are, I think it's necessary for you to study them again. Instead of thinking about how to modify the core code.
In addition, the current Linux system's IFC p2pool has nothing to do with you at all.
Node found that infinite coins overseas fans returned, wallet version 1.8.6, block just synchronized to 2030,000, they want to develop infinite coins back.
http://m.qpic.cn/psb?/c67e428a-707d-4cd6-b804-b6c6286d5171/l0QXqy1AGXD47txZ8C0RK*fVtm29a5I4V11ScleLfCw!/b/dFMBAAAAAAAA&bo=CgSaAgAAAAARF7Y!&rf=viewer_4
http://m.qpic.cn/psb?/c67e428a-707d-4cd6-b804-b6c6286d5171/l0QXqy1AGXD47txZ8C0RK*fVtm29a5I4V11ScleLfCw!/b/dFMBAAAAAAAA&bo=CgSaAgAAAAARF7Y!&rf=viewer_4
It is found that the block speed of synchronization of this node is a little slow, probably due to the opening of port 9321 in synchronization.
If you want fast synchronization, you should close port 9321 first and open it after synchronization is completed.
IFC is the most suitable currency for daily small transactions, and the wallet does not need to be installed quickly and easily. The transfer rate is extremely fast, and the miners based on the internal circulation fee model share an extremely large settlement scale.
Implementing one-person-one-node plan Our node plan is very simple. There is no need for anyone to lock the warehouse. There is no restriction. It is completely for the nodes of the infinite currency. It is more reliable and decentralized. The current infinite currency node is no longer a problem.
I noticed that the total number of wallet addresses has increased by 220 since June. Although the growth rate is not very fast, and the new address may be more active.
The road is step by step, the foundation is to slowly lay down, nothing is a step into the sky! It is good to have an increase, let us slowly lay the foundation of IFC together!
I noticed that the total number of wallet addresses has increased by 220 since June. Although the growth rate is not very fast, and the new address may be more active.
Although the development of IFC mining machines is relatively slow, it will soon reach 200. Gold will always shine when it passes ten or ten to one hundred. Come on.
Jump to: