Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 306. (Read 473154 times)

So it's not really the store offering a refund, is it? And it's not actually an "exchange" but an "auction" with a minimum price (floor LOL). Any guesses as to what the price of atoms would be if the market was a real market?

You still haven't addressed the income source, added value, whatever you wanna call it. Could it be that you're avoiding this subject due to said "value" being zero so far?

For ATOM's they were sold on an exchange so the money came from other people bidding.

Have you ever stopped to ask yourself where that money came from?

Come to think of it, what is or was xpy.io/ionomy source of income for the last 18 months? (or however far back you wanna go and explore this subject)

Explain how those that left exited with a profit? A profit in extra xpy? Its only a realised profit when its actual sold to evaluate. When its not sold its a potential loss or profit.

People bought XPYBits for BTC

When they were converted to ATOM if you wanted to sell you could have sold your ATOMs for BTC.

The difference between your XPYbits buy price vs ATOM sell price is profit.

I'll try to simplify

You go to store order and pay for something which is $100

When you go to the store to pick it up the store offers you something which they say is better but completely different.

You don't like it and ask for a refund

You get $130 back because the price is based on the new thing you didn't like.

You walk away richer by $30

I dont consider repetitive failures to be good.  So their past history is not a good advertisement!

Hey WildShark, I mean WildShill, you gonna keep ignoring that screen shot question I had? I have to ask you here as on the IONtalk forum you whine like a little fucking baby and report posts you don't like, which are characteristics of ultra shills like yourself.

And also its ties to XPY.

No what is a good AD for the company/people is how they handled the transition of Business model and direction, they could have so easily screwed people over but they didn't. This shows ION's commitment to it's investors more than I can say for most crypto startups. 

You omitted the part where they needed another round of funding to keep going. Of course it can last as long as people keep pouring money into it.

Garza - because he promised like 3 or 4 different debit/credit card options for XPY too, none of which materialized.


You just said yourself in the quote above that ionomy wasn't a fresh start... so was it or not?

What is it with those paycoiners trying to have their cake and eat it too.

That is what every ION person is saying but then you said the XPYbits image was a good promotion for ION. XPYbits transferred to Atoms which are in the Ionomy. How is ION not related to XPY?

ION has nothing to do with XPY

I was under the understanding that ION has NOTHING to do with XPY? Seems that is not the case.

How so please elaborate

Funny you should mention implement change not giving a shit about their current investors because thats what the xpybits people did. Those investors invested to get what was advertised and didn't actually get that. They got a wait and then no delivery but a implemented change without giving a shit to the current investors. If they did care they would have considered the investors finished the product and gave the option for those not wanting the advertised product to transition.

At a profit? There is no such thing as profit for everyone. Anything in investing is always neutral. Money in ALWAYS equals money out. For someone to profit someone has to make a loss. There is no such thing as profits for everyone.

Explain how those that left exited with a profit? A profit in extra xpy? Its only a realised profit when its actual sold to evaluate. When its not sold its a potential loss or profit.

I wouldn't call the posted above roadmap a good AD unless its actually implemented. Is something thats not out good AD? At that point in time it can be considered possibly... if later it never comes then was it an AD that was bad and promoted a scam? I get it you're invested you want it to succeed and you like it. I just find it amusing that you don't acknowledge any of the red flags.. you simply turn all red flags into orange ones with a green lining. To be balanced in your investment you need to actually give credit where they are and acknowledge them... to better your investment you should raise them to turn the red ones into green through action not ignorance.

So they didn't start fresh is what you are saying? I was under the understanding that ION has NOTHING to do with XPY? Seems that is not the case.

You've just posted a really good AD for Ionomy 

XPY.io roadmap nothing shameful here .... When the company changed direction how many people that owned XPYBits got screwed over..... the answer is ZERO

Those that stayed now own ATOM,ION & Electrons. Those that left exited at a profit.

How many companies in the crypto space treat their investors in a similar manner. Most companies either F**k off with the money, get hacked or go ahead and implement change not giving a shit about their current investors..... it would have been so easy for these guys to walk away and start afresh but they never

Your last bit confused me..... what's with the Garza quote

WildShark, what's up with this? This doesn't look like it would fit on a mobile screen too well at all. Is this a website? So the gamers will need to download the game and use a website? Or are you going to ignore this for the 4th time and instead be your same useless self and shill for the community masternodes?

WildShark, quit ignoring this question:

The screen shot you posted a little while ago from the Gravity game sure looked like a web page. So game player need the mobile game AND a website to deal with? It's a jumpy shooter game for fucks sake, why the damn website? You really think new users will want to deal with that? You're adding another step, complicating things. Well thought out.

The game isn't released yet you moron!!! You're still on step fucking one! Quit misleading people you shameless shill.

No thanks. The business model is intransparent and doesn't make sense. Keep your worthless shitcoin.

Yep, that's right, the cure for sharkspamming is more sharkspamming. Have you seen roadmap 1.0 (being a shark you must have)? Stop for a minute to enjoy the déjà vu.

@WildShark
Okay, I checked out the Ionomy Roadmap.
It says:

1. COIN LAUNCH AND THE IONOMY BEGINS.  May 14, 2016. The ionomy comes to life via blockchain technology, coupled with ionomy.com platform features. ION ICO coins are distributed, the platform opens for advanced staking, the exchange goes live, and electrons begin flowing.
2. GAME RELEASES FUELING USER GROWTH. Growth phase begins. New users join the platform, game offerings expand, and the first phase of platform expansion begins. With a target of one game per month following Gravity's release, the ionomy.com game developers continue development of new games and features. Ranging from action to puzzle and word games, the releases will seek to bring fresh and innovative gameplay while expanding ionomy.com platform rewards, incentives, and features. Social and affiliate rewards begin to accumulate during this time, creating positive user and micro economic growth within the ionosphere.

Now, it seems to me that between step 1 and step 2 half a year has passed. Where are the games "ranging from action to puzzle and word games"? Release date of the first game (Gravity) was in June, and instead of that plus one game per month all you have is - supposedely - an alpha version of the Gravity game. Aren't you a little alarmed that the roadmap Ionomy posted half a year ago is already stuck between first and second step? Furthermore, aren't you worried that the subreddit of Ionomy has only 10 readers? Meanwhile the 24 hour trading volume of ION according to coinmarketcap is still stuck at zero dollars today. What kind of a "growth phase" is this?