Also worth an email to Kathleen Shields at the SEC to let them know they'll have a new criminal to go after once they're done with Homero Garza.
[email protected]So Ion creates an ICO and you are going to report Matlack to the SEC? Bahahahaha, your credibility has reached zero.
You say "Ion" as if it's some legitimate, respected company. It's just rebranded paycoin scam led by Homero Garza's best bud Adam. Go ahead and be blinded by your greed. Why don't you just give Matlack a bag of cash and walk away, it will be easier on all involved. Are you retarded?
Ps. I spent almost 2 years trying to convince morons like you that Garza was a scammer. Who the fuck are you?
The way you communicate really should give you a clue as to why absolutely nobody listens to you.
I'm open to all reasonable discussion.
I will try to keep this to your ridiculous definition of "reasonable" in hopes you or someone else can learn something and save some money in the future.
Your definition of reasonable appears to be foolish, and your decision to only listen to and/or communicate with people who fit into that definition has already cost you a boatload of money, and it apears it will do that again in the future.
If Person A says he will sell this thing to you for $4 and then buy it back from you for $20 in 2 months, and Person B says, "that makes no fucking sense, stop being an asshole scammer," although Person B used some colorful language, his statement was much more reasonable than person A's, because it had some basis of reality on this planet. You listened to Person A, and lost money before, so sticking to that idea doesn't seem that great.
Stop worrying about HOW people communicate, and listen to what they are actually saying. Conmen always appear "reasonable" until they are running with your money. Sticking with the people that were heavily involved in GAW with Garza (when it was a complete scam) or after Garza (when it was completely hopeless and a waste of time, unless they were just plotting to rob everyone with something else later) seems insane to me.
Again, people involved with GAW were either involved in the scam and too stupid to see it was a scam, I"m not sure who falls into which group, but I'm not going to touch anything involving either in the future.
Some people just call everything a scam. In crypto you can be sure that even the most stupid people will be right some of the time.
This is why facts / evidence to back up claims is required. When you separate ego from facts you are left with reasonable discussion.
No coin has ever been launched that wasn't called a scam.
How you communicate means everything - especially if you want people to listen.
That's a terrible way to go through life.
The people acting nicely are usually the one's trying to steal your money, the people acting rudely are trying to get you to save it. If you are going to hold them to the same standard you are going to end up fucked, again.
In another post you said that it's sad that this is the "same people, same war," wouldn't you want to be on the side of the war that has been proven to be 100% right?
Their message bay be a little rough, but doesn't the fact that they were able to see that GAW was s scam from day 1 prove that they have some knowledge that may be helpful to you in the future?
We have all the facts on GAW now, they weren't "lucky" that they called everything a scam and got this one right. You can now see that the miners didn't exist, that there was no deal with amazon, that paycoin never made sense, etc.
Those that don't study history are doomed to repeat it, if the "same war" of Gaw haters vs Gaw lovers is going on, I know which side I would be on, because 1 side saw GAW for exactly what it was, and the other side was either implicit in the scam or too dumb to see it.
bet you're too gutless to say. Prove me wrong
