Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 61. (Read 473183 times)

15k sat, gravity is kicking in (pun intended).

what i cant understand is this api is all done working tested right? so why dont they use unreal engine... its free. make a deathmatch game with included unreal assets. use the blueprint system make basic games. the engines tried and tested. it is compatiable with ios and android..,

ok so games creation isnt their thing? why dont they leverage existing games link api, reward gamers for kills.

ok so they are maybe shit at that too? host tournaments rent game servers fortnite, cs:go. view matches reward winners in ion.

ok so they might be shit at that? use all that horded premine which has increased through staking and pay someone in ion or sell to btc (cause we know nobody wants that ion shit) to host this for you. reach out to twitch and known gamers.

matlack is just so horrible at what he does. i dont even think he knows what hes doing. prolly just paying himself in bounties.

something gaming related... thats what the coins core vision is right?

If they were capable of producing games they wouldn't need the gimmickry with the masternodes.

awesome.... timelock coins and let the devs double their masternodes with their premine. block times same so those with less coins still get nothing while devs get more chances for masternode reqards.

another stupid idea.

maybe focus on network use first and core use before trying for price increase. still 0 third party games on ion even after going to an expo.

how many years does matlack need?

how many satoshi did ion start life as and how many now?

Proposal #4 would see the collateral needed for a masternode size cut by 50%. If this proposal is agreed upon, everyone with a masternode now would then be able to have 2. This would double the ION masternode network and lower the threshold for others interesting in hosting which is essential to “protect profitability and make sure the network can achieve what it needs to achieve to drive the protocol level value of ION as a whole.” Combined with proposal #3 these updates have the potential to rocket ION beyond its imagined destination.

Who lied about the number of employees ionomy had in 2016? You or Matlack or both?

If you don't know the answer ask on discord and report back.

If you think ion/ionomy and myself are frauds then you are 100% wrong. To make an assessment based on BCT posts especially suchmoon's is just being naive.

This is what fraud looks like....  



Hype without substance only lasts for so long, in Paycoin's case it was $13 to 7 cents in 6 mths.

This what fraud doesn't look like



ION started life 20/25 cents. Ion is now 2 years 2 months old. No fraud here, what you see is an active development team.

If you think this is all rubbish that's fine your choice but to call us frauds is just plain wrong. BTW the only reason I'm responding is I've looked at your post history seen you've made some good posts so am kinda surprised by this one

So what do you suggest ?

The latest ION Wallet (version 3.0.4)  can be downloaded at https://ionomy.com/download

From what I known, The team is updating the wallet to ION 3.0 and will provide Bittrex and the community with upgraded wallet

so basically price isnt increasing how they want so try to encourage people to lock for long times so less coins sold to have a false price economy....

gotcha. what a stupid suggestion.

Proposal #3 is the suggestion to restructure masternode rewards to a “timelock based structure” and is a direct precursor to proposal #4. At this time 20,000 ION are required to host a masternode. In Matlack’s words, “You can move in and out of masternode status in about 24 hours, you have no penalty, and you get half the block reward.” The ION team proposes the following solution to maintain a stronger masternode presence as more work begins to be offloaded to the second layer.

“If you were to lock up your initial 20,000 ION output for 30 days, when you hit a block instead of your master node getting 50% and the staking node getting 50% reward, your masternode would instead get 55% and the staking node would get 45%” with higher gains the longer the coins are locked up.

Proposed Reward Structure


According to Matlack, “what this does is 2 things, it encourages people to lock coins up for a longer time to prevent the flipping of it and if they (masternode owners) want the economic advantage of receiving a payout, say 25% higher than a normal masternode then they can commit to locked stake....This is a big deal and we (the ION team) feel strongly that it should be like this." Overall, if this proposal is voted in by the community, “If you make a longer commitment there's a better outcome for you” and in theory, a better outcome for the network.

https://ion.community/topic/2357/proposal-to-change-masternode-staking-reward-structure

I agree on this. You are the only user here that fighting against this such of fraud. Keep up the good fight!

What tactics is that? Not falling for your lies? Yeah that's me.

But ok, let's discuss price going from 45k-55k sat down to 17k immediately after you answer this:

who lied about the number of employees ionomy had in 2016? You or Matlack or both?

The only reason ION price doesn't come into the discussion is it doesn't fit your narrative The reality is you have been trolling ION/IONOMY  since it's inception that's over 2 years and you still use the same tactics..... yawn

Like I'm gonna waste my time responding to this shit

Oh and a big high 5 to kken01 haven't seen you post on this thread in a while. In fact where you been ?? you last post on BCT was January 12 2018 ? you must be very busy with all the charity work you do but it's nice to see your still lurking here like snail ready to spring into action.... anyway hope you've been well

So love posting here   such nice people  

This is the ION Blockchain pumping out more "free coins" for Masternode and Wallet Staking Owners...

What I'm looking team particularly news does not spoil the community. In General, now is probably such a time that almost any project can become successful in the future.