By fixing the bug in the original code you broke the way every pool has functioned since the very beginning, a bit surprising you consider it outside of the scope of the blockchain development.
I'm referring to the original code the node was built from, and no, the node has not been updated since the last time it was necessary to do so. http://irdpool.tk is the oldest pool on the network, I will not be subjecting it to every latest patch the moment it comes out before end-users have a chance to test it. This update was applied because it is required, and unlike last time you bothered to actually message me about it.
The way you are posting is embarrassing to this project and the network. Like you I do this for free, but I still have a modest amount of professionalism and I would have been happy to keep this exchange private. This could have been resolved simply by stating the minor change required that *every pool* must do, instead of passive-aggressive taunting.
I don't agree, I don't like insincerity and I think everyone should know what really happens : I gave you every keys, I just don't gave you the easy solution.
If only you follow a little the project, you would have been aware and if only if you had been nice, I surely assist you fixing this minor change.
I really don't like receiving laconic message like "My pool stopped unlocking blocks are moving over to the new version, here's the relevant error messages..." point. It is disrespectful.
By updating the code 2 month ago I put things back in the right order. Since the 2.1.2 update, no more change is required in the pool code so everyone can build a pool easily. So modification for *every pool* ? not really, just yours because you stay left. Every others run fine since 2 month.
One last thing : I don't care about modest amount of professionalism or politically correct. Just sincerity, respect, kindness and results matter to me.
closed discussion.
I simply reiterate, you fundamentally changed the way the node handled blocks. Not only did you break
every pool (or at least any pool that has been around for any real period of time) with your change, you apparently also broke the GUI wallets as well (as per Petiyashaket). You did not ever inform me of this until I sent you the relevant logs (which is precisely the point), at which point the answer was simple because you understood that you had broken anything that communicates with the node via RPC. Instead you decided to intentionally withhold the specific information from me.
While you're stumbling your way through a git pull of the upstream ByteCoin you might bother to note any ecosystem breaking changes next time.
How exactly are you going to handle this when an exchange is trying to communicate with the node software? Get angry at them, too? Clearly it's their fault that you changed the way everything has functioned since the beginning, I mean, it was a bug after all. It's concerns like this that made me want to keep this private.