Just found another project KickCity, reward-based community on blockchain (ERC20). In their article on Medium I read they also want to use KICK token name... (check their Pre-sale details: https://medium.com/@kickcity_io/weekly-update-24-09-17-7851d4c55f5e). Have they contacted you?
And it's not a problem, right? Token is already registered and in use. I guess they'll be quite disappointed - KC is busy now and KICK either...
And it's not a problem, right? Token is already registered and in use. I guess they'll be quite disappointed - KC is busy now and KICK either...
That IS odd. I wonder why they decided upon using "KICK" as their token name?
How could they not know that "KICK" was already being used by KickICO's tokens?
Plus I think both KickCity and KickICO tokens are both Bancor protocol?
Seems weird.
I think you have it the other way around. KickCity came out prior to KickICO, both based in Russia with the former catering to the offering of tickets via crypto. City is simply now accepting KCs for payment.
So do you mean that KickCity is "simply now" accepting our KICK tokens? Or are they using their own tokens?
In KickCity's whitepaper it says, "KickCity currently supports ticket purchase using FIAT & Bitcoins. In the next few months, we will support KICK, Ethereum and other ERC20 tokens."
So our tokens will be accepted by KickCity?? Or are they talking about their own KICK tokens? I'm confused
The tokens they are or will be accepting are the KICK/KC tokens which KickICO created.
Somebody correct me if I'm mistaken.
Bruno
Talked to KickICO representatives in Telegram and they told me all this is a coincidence. These 2 projects are not connected anyhow. Though it raises some concerns about KickCity project (not KickICO), because in their whitepaper it is stated they are going to sell "KICK" tokens for exactly the same price: 1 ETH = 3000 KICK, which is weird, isn't it?..
