am going to be honest, the only thing am not happy about, and maybe i might be out of line and someone could correct me, is that Kick is utilizing an ico to start a crowd-funding website, then they going to charge other companies 4% to utilize the aforementioned site for their own ico. Seems unfair to me, given that kick will be community funded from the ico while others pay them to use it. I know they have to turn profit somehow, but it seem unfair. Anyway, just my observation, i could be wrong in so many way, and if so, am open to be educated.
"while others pay them to use it".What is that mean?
I mean for every other company that utilizes their platform to run an ico, they will keep 4% of the raised amount, and if am not mistaken, if a token is issued, they also keep 4% of it. Again, my observation might be wrong/jaded and if so, am open to be educated.
Yeah that is the correct amount 4% of raised and 4% of tokens created. This is a reasonable price to pay for using the kickico platform. Some exchanges also host ICO's and the percentage they take are much greater regardless if your ICO raised the minimum amount or not.
with this way kikcico platform will be more familiar and certainly can compete with other projects. But sorry can i know the 3 projects you mean? 
. 
