Can you please help me understand...if the price I get on leaserig is always going to be higher than the amount of coins I can mine with the leased equipment, why should I lease?
If the price you get on leaserig is higher than the amount of coins you can mine with leased equipment you shouldn't lease.
I do want to point out two things: The reason you see higher prices on leaserig is the reliability of the system and providers as well as the quick purchase and rehiring of lower priced miners. IE if I lease a rig at .005B/mh/day it will likely never come up on the page if offer a 10% rehire discount. They will likely just stay leased to the same person.
Most of our renters (Except leaserig staff who rent to test our providers and system) make more than they pay renting rigs and continue to rent because of this.
I think you will find the upcoming expansions to leaserigs will make it a far more valuable tool than anything else out there.
You're right. If the price were .005 then renters could make a small profit.
However, the stats page would lead me to seriously question the "most of our renters make money" claim. For example, today the trailing average all day has been hovering around .007 BTC/Mhs/day while the most profitable coins have been around .006 with a top ten average around the mid .005's. Adding in leasing fees and such make the gap bigger. Then there's the pool fees, withdrawal fees, etc. on top of that. The only way for a renter to profit would be to "mine and hold" hoping for the coin value to increase. But honestly, if that's their intention then buying the coins instead of mining them would be much more profitable since they wouldn't be sacrificing up to a third of their capital before getting their coins.
Don't get me wrong. I like the concept of renting rigs. I think it provides a much needed service. But so far I haven't seen any prices for leasing a rig that would profitable to the renter. Maybe I'm just catching the stats page at the wrong times of the day or something.
The way I see it:
I (a provider) have certain resources, which include expensive equipment, power, cooling, knowledge to set it all up and keep it running.
I can use all that to mine on a multipool and get 0.005 on a good day. Or I can spend enormous amounts of time trying to figure out how to make maybe 0.007.
The buyer (renter) has knowledge and/or expectation of more profitable mining but lacks the aforementioned resources. Perhaps the renter lives in a place where equipment and/or power is more expensive, perhaps there is a short window of opportunity and it is not worth investing in their own equipment, perhaps the renter is smart and can outmaneuver gigahash pools with better mining/trading strategies - there could be many reasons why that would make sense and here's the best part: I don't have to care about that, just like the renter doesn't have to care about getting rid of 20kW of excess heat. I take care of equipment, renters take care of mining, perfect.
Supply and demand, division of labor, whatever you want to call it, it's just some basic free market principles at work here, and functioning quite well I think.