Pages:
Author

Topic: ^_^ [ANN] LimiCoin / X15 / pow-pos / Hashrate Limitation Removing - page 19. (Read 46844 times)

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
when exchnage market 'n which?
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Hello everyone. My 280x are giving me only 2.15 mh/s. My settings are :

{
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp://limi.maxminers.net:5555",
      "user" : "xxxxx.3",
      "pass" : "x"
   }
]
,
"intensity" : "18",
"vector" : "1",
"worksize" : "64",
"kernel" : "bitblock",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

Also i would like to add that i have four cards  and only 4gb of ram so maybe that is a problem? I see everyone is getting about 2.7 mh/s or 2.8 mh/s Does anyone have any idea what could i do to get that performance?

How many cards did you have?
For more than 4 GPUS use the latest drivers from Windows Update.
If you're using 1-4  GPUS try to install Catalyst 14.7 RC:
http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/latest-catalyst-windows-beta.aspx

And try this settings:

Quote
{
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp://limi.maxminers.net:5555",
      "user" : "xxxxx.3",
      "pass" : "x"
   }
],

"name" : "x15",
"algorithm" : "bitblock",
"intensity" : "20",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "1",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize": "128",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "90",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"shaders" : "2048",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1"
}

Don't forget to add this lines in your *.bat

Code:
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer.exe --config "name.conf"

On the end... you can try to overclock your GPU core at 1050-1150MHz (HW must be 0).
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Hello everyone. My 280x are giving me only 2.15 mh/s. My settings are :

{
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp://limi.maxminers.net:5555",
      "user" : "xxxxx.3",
      "pass" : "x"
   }
]
,
"intensity" : "18",
"vector" : "1",
"worksize" : "64",
"kernel" : "bitblock",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

Also i would like to add that i have four cards  and only 4gb of ram so maybe that is a problem? I see everyone is getting about 2.7 mh/s or 2.8 mh/s Does anyone have any idea what could i do to get that performance?
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
does anyone know how to get a amd 6850 to work , I have used every miner I could find but nothing works,

I have also a 280x which works fine with the sgminer 4.2.1 ,  it starts the 6850 also but nothing happens , I dont get any connection or blocks
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
wallet ?

No wallet until POW ends. Closed source to ensure hash limits
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
Something is wrong here... I am not reaching 20Mh/s so where is my 9.4% or 1.68Mh/s? (17.76Mh/s vs 16.08MH/s)

I have 2 RIGS and always the same Hash Rate per GPU = 2.2Mh/s (X15)

My specs:
Rig 1: 4x MSI Radeon HD 7990 (underclocked @ 950MHz, undervolted @ 1.1
Rig 2: 3x MSI Radeon HD 7990 (underclocked @ 950MHz, undervolted @ 1.1
Windows 8.1 Update 1 and the latest drivers from Windows Udpate 13.251.9001.1001 (2014/07/04)

Test 1 - Maxminer.net or Suprnova.cc @ Rig 1 (8GPUs)

  • sgminer 4.2.2 (build 2014-07-20): 1.990Mh/s / GPU
  • sgminer 4.2.1 (build 2014-06-25): 1.840Mh/s / GPU

Result: The latest version of sgminer 4.2.2 is 7.5% faster than sgminer 4.2.1 build (2014-06-25) but still 9.4% slower than original speed 2.2MH/s.

Test 2 - Maxminer.net or Suprnova.cc @ Rig 2 (6GPUs)

  • sgminer 4.2.2 (build 2014-07-20): 2.010Mh/s / GPU
  • sgminer 4.2.1 (build 2014-06-25): 2.220Mh/s / GPU

Result: The latest version of sgminer 4.2.2 is 9.4% slower than sgminer 4.2.1 build (2014-06-25).
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
Twitter @Acimirov
Ocminer is the true hero of the bct forum, no doubt.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Growcoin Chief
Ocminer, did you read my PM?  Smiley

I've got like 60 unread pm's.. I'll look through them really soon !



joke.. joke..


Thnx for setting up an extra blockexplorer mate... awesome Smiley
legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Ocminer, did you read my PM?  Smiley

I've got like 60 unread pm's.. I'll look through them really soon !

Whoops, okay. Have fun reading them  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Ocminer, did you read my PM?  Smiley

I've got like 60 unread pm's.. I'll look through them really soon !
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Guys stop that FUD shit with the hidden Pool and the Network Hashrate.

You can see every Block is either mined by Suprnova or Maxminers.. Even if the Nethash would show 1000000 TH it makes no difference..

Every Block is found by one of the two Pools and the rewards are then split between the miners mining there. YOU CAN LOOK FOR YOURSELF, EVERYTHING IS PUBLIC !

Some people simply rented 100 MH/s rigs instead of 20 MH/s rigs and pointed them to suprnova (or maxminers), the 80 MH/s get discarded but they are counted by the network.. Suprnova or Maxminers finds blocks then more often and the blocks get split up to the miners at the pool in even shares, counted at 20 MH/s, not 80 MH/s...

I dont know what is so hard to understand here ?

Thank you for explaining this.

I am a miner and a person who works all day for a living. When I come home, I'd rather do something other than spending whatever's left of the day counting blocks. This is why I trust your input. You will excuse me if I don't take the word of someone with an Activity score of 28 who just launched "yet another coin" when they claim everything is legit.

Once again, thank you ocminer.

I understand that your cautious with all these scams going on, but I'm a miner too and I was counting the blocks all the time and could not find a problem.

I'm sure some others are also watchting, IF a block would be missing, it would be posted here within SECONDS Smiley

(It will be a lot of fun when PoS starts.. People will start screaming SCAAAAAMMMM !! :-))


can you make a "third party"  blockexplorer for this coin too?

That would be nice..  Smiley

Yes I will tomorrow !
legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Ocminer, did you read my PM?  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Growcoin Chief
Guys stop that FUD shit with the hidden Pool and the Network Hashrate.

You can see every Block is either mined by Suprnova or Maxminers.. Even if the Nethash would show 1000000 TH it makes no difference..

Every Block is found by one of the two Pools and the rewards are then split between the miners mining there. YOU CAN LOOK FOR YOURSELF, EVERYTHING IS PUBLIC !

Some people simply rented 100 MH/s rigs instead of 20 MH/s rigs and pointed them to suprnova (or maxminers), the 80 MH/s get discarded but they are counted by the network.. Suprnova or Maxminers finds blocks then more often and the blocks get split up to the miners at the pool in even shares, counted at 20 MH/s, not 80 MH/s...

I dont know what is so hard to understand here ?

Thank you for explaining this.

I am a miner and a person who works all day for a living. When I come home, I'd rather do something other than spending whatever's left of the day counting blocks. This is why I trust your input. You will excuse me if I don't take the word of someone with an Activity score of 28 who just launched "yet another coin" when they claim everything is legit.

Once again, thank you ocminer.

I understand that your cautious with all these scams going on, but I'm a miner too and I was counting the blocks all the time and could not find a problem.

I'm sure some others are also watchting, IF a block would be missing, it would be posted here within SECONDS Smiley

(It will be a lot of fun when PoS starts.. People will start screaming SCAAAAAMMMM !! :-))


can you make a "third party"  blockexplorer for this coin too?

That would be nice..  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
Twitter @Acimirov
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
tz
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 251
looks like the same dev there
It's not Dev...  Problem of many is limitation! Wink

I tend to disagree. Limitation is good, as it tends to ensure a fair distribution. It's the implementation that's troublesome. But as long as the people doing the limitation are trustworthy, everything should be fine.
hero member
Activity: 550
Merit: 500
Launch yesterday was better. Now its boring and low hash
Pages:
Jump to: