Topic: [ANN] lolMiner-mnx, Mining MinexCoin(MNX) New version: v0.4 (July 22) - page 11. (Read 30715 times)

Around the same time diff gone down...
https://minexexplorer.com/

And what is more important it was found from version 0.22...

 

Even so, 120 minutes after we switched versions and voila... block found 

You miss one point: the nethash displayed by the pools is taken from the deamon connected to the pool (since every pool runs a full minex node so it can add blocks). This deamon calculates the nethash from the average time it took to mine the last blocks and the current network difficulty. So if this calculation says 200Msols it is likely that the true speed is between 180 and 220M.

From the numbers I see in my fee connectors the 0.3x versions together do about 150Msols and all 0.2x versions about 30M... so it is almost impossible that all 0.3x versions only send wrong shares that can not build a block. Especially I have seen blocks build by my fee connectors (approx 3 to 4 a day) so this versions do propper calculations.

Finally when pool sends a message that share is accepted and the pool is displaying sol/s I would expect the pool had checked the share it gets. If you claim this happens on your pool but the pool is not able to build a block from accepted shares something might be horribly wrong with the pool.

Overall I think you just had bad luck (with 0.3x) and good one with 0.22. At those rates the volatility is very high.

@Global diff: the recent down in prize and high diff made the profitability sink below level of other coins so miners left. The numbers I see here fit, so the sol/s arriving fit to nethash calculated from block time and my market share. I think all is ok here.

That pool is currently reporting 672.72 k sols.  The network is currently 198594.56 ksols. 

That is 0.3% of the network hash.  On average the pool should find less than two blocks a day, but with numbers that small not getting any for a few days is still within range for normal.  The page itself lists the current luck at 0.661. 

Is it possible that the pool recently lost some mining power to explain why the returns have gone down? 

I dont see the miner switching back to the primary pool on one of the rigs. How can I see whether it is trying or not? Is it possible to see a message in the log when a job is received and eta to the next primary pool try?

I locate my miner in to your pool but after 24hrs of straight mining, I haven't seen any coin to my account, 24hrs of nothing... I going back to suprnova..

Try to set these options in bat file: --set-work-batch 2G --optim STD
If not help try to set 6 cards to run in one cmd miner and 7 in other, so command should be like this: --device 0,1,2,3,4,5 in first bat, and --device 6,7,8,9,10,11,12 (not sure will miner have options to reconize command for --device like is number of card with two decimals..)

i have 13 GTX 1060. Why GPU 1 --> 6 ~ 9k Sol/s but  GPU 7 --> 13 ~ 7k Sol/s. Please help me T_T

[Device 0] Average speed (5s): 9382.12 sol/s
[Device 1] Average speed (5s): 9522.9 sol/s
[Device 2] Average speed (5s): 9543.41 sol/s
[Device 3] Average speed (5s): 9518.32 sol/s
[Device 4] Average speed (5s): 9527.48 sol/s
[Device 5] Average speed (5s): 9473.32 sol/s
[Device 6] Average speed (5s): 7309.84 sol/s
[Device 7] Average speed (5s): 7378.34 sol/s
[Device 8] Average speed (5s): 7459.38 sol/s
[Device 9] Average speed (5s): 7189.37 sol/s
[Device 10] Average speed (5s): 7461.77 sol/s
[Device 11] Average speed (5s): 7315.41 sol/s
[Device 12] Average speed (5s): 7324.77 sol/s

V.33 Sol/s (Not overclocked beyond factory) on Windows 10
GTX 970 SSC - 10700 Sol/s
GTX 980 - 11000 Sol/s
GTX 980 SC - 12100 Sol/s
GTX 1050ti - 6600 Sol/s
RX 460 OC 2gb - 3800 Sol/s

thank you miner. I will try it

And what if someone actually want to mine to dev's address?

Well that could be water cooled then or in fact a 1080TI - usually Windows and Linux should not make a difference. But it is questionable if such OC is worth because the consumption is high then too. I usually recommend running lolMiner at 75 to 85 % power target.




The connection delay is 5 seconds and it tries to reconnect  5 times per default ... so after half a minute it should switch.
I also saw many miners switch, but for some it did not work. What I also saw is that the 0.30 to 0.32 versions have problems when the primary pool is not available when the miner starts - then they may just crash. That was resolved in 0.33. But I will double check if there are general problems with this feature that needs fix in next version.



By the way:
Please look at your rigs if these are correctly configured.
I see one rig with about 100k sol mining to my account with the 0.31 example configuration - not that I have something against donations, but I think this is not intended

fall back pool does not seem to work. minexpool is out for half a day and the miner does not switch.. or it takes so long that hiveos just turns it off

how long is the connection delay? please reduce it

That is nice speed on 980 Ti,
on 1080 i got 19.8 kSol/s on stock speeds, on PL 85: around 19.6 kSol/s.

I'm also curious what are speed compered to linux version of this miner?

Somewhare I saw that 1080 can reach 23 kSol/s on linux, and I was unable to even past 20 kSol/s on Windows.

Just a few questions:
Are those card hashrates on the front page on Windows or Linux?
And are they stock speeds or overclocked?

I can report 980 TI 18k sol/s, Windows 10, stock speed .

What are you talking about?
This is Minexcoin miner's lolMiner thread. Please ask questions concerning Minexcoin with an announcement thread.

Minexcoin - A new era of payments
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/minexcoin-a-new-era-of-payments-1847292

Is this calculation correct - for monthly to be less profitable than annual?   -  70 / 365 * 30 = 5.753      Therefore at current annual rate, monthly is more profitable than annual above 5.753%

why doesn't the earth in the main web page revolve around any more? (not saying it should, but would be nice to see it moving.. haha) no.And  why is the minexsystems registered in hong kong? any specific reason for that?

@Lolliedieb : great, I will wait with impatience for V0.4 with Fiji support I will report on hash rates as soon as available. Thanks!