Topic: [ANN] [LTC] [PPS] [OTP 2FA] [Stratum only] LTCMine PPS mining pool (3.3%) - page 59. (Read 227601 times)
April 22, 2013, 11:37:18 AM
Nichost adjusted ETA again, now it's 21:00 GMT+4. It seems that something went wrong at this time.
April 22, 2013, 11:31:49 AM
Front end and pool are working for me.
April 22, 2013, 11:12:36 AM
Pool is working fine for me as well. Frontend still down, though.
I appreciate the transparency Balthazar.
I appreciate the transparency Balthazar.
April 22, 2013, 10:31:17 AM
You are right, ltcmine and nvc explorer has shared IP, it's synproxy front-end.
April 22, 2013, 10:31:03 AM
Just started working again for me.
April 22, 2013, 10:29:10 AM
Hm... It seems that I was wrong. Our DNS provider http://nichost.ru also unavailable now.
Possible workaround is adding
to hosts file.
Possible workaround is adding
Code:
91.235.143.14 ltcmine.ru
to hosts file.
In my case this ip-address leads to Abe Search that lists novacoin blocks, but it ain't the weirdest thing I've encountered with updating dns-servers
Hope they get 'em fixed soon.
April 22, 2013, 10:09:17 AM
===>
FAIL
Quote
Плaниpyeмoe вpeмя oкoнчaния paбoт - 20:00 MCК. Пpинocим извинeния зa дocтaвлeнныe нeyдoбcтвa.
Quote
Maintenance will be completed at 20:00 GMT+4 approximately. We apologize for inconvenience.
FAIL
April 22, 2013, 09:56:54 AM
Quote
Плaниpyeмoe вpeмя oкoнчaния paбoт - 19:00 MCК. Пpинocим извинeния зa дocтaвлeнныe нeyдoбcтвa.
Quote
Maintenance will be completed at 19:00 GMT+4 approximately. We apologize for inconvenience.
// Message from Nichost.
Hm... Current local time is 19:06 and I still see this message...
April 22, 2013, 09:46:14 AM
Hm... It seems that I was wrong. Our DNS provider http://nichost.ru also unavailable now.
Possible workaround is adding
to hosts file.
Possible workaround is adding
Code:
91.235.143.14 ltcmine.ru
to hosts file.
April 22, 2013, 09:37:20 AM
Is the pool offline at the moment? I get page not available in Chrome.
Web interface connections limit was exceeded sometimes. I'll increase it soon.
April 22, 2013, 09:35:30 AM
Strange but I cant connect to the pool from either of my miners or to the website form either of my computers or phone. It just says the website cont be found. Anyone else getting this?
Edit: I see im not the only one and it is a known issue.
I can't connect any of my miners to the pool. It says there is no pool detected. Its the same settings I used to mine yesterday so idk what's up.
Edit 2: as I type that it connects :-).
Edit: I see im not the only one and it is a known issue.
I can't connect any of my miners to the pool. It says there is no pool detected. Its the same settings I used to mine yesterday so idk what's up.
Edit 2: as I type that it connects :-).
April 22, 2013, 09:34:57 AM
Is the pool offline at the moment? I get page not available in Chrome.
Web interface connections limit was exceeded sometimes. I'll increase it soon. 
April 22, 2013, 09:31:30 AM
I just stumbled upon this pool, after notoroll being abusive, coinotron having too much rejects and wemineltec and givemeltc having crappy yields, not to mention the very first pool-x being mediocre.
I am absolutely satisfied even after 2 days of mining. Even the website design is more than enough, just the info that is needed.
Hats off, will stay with my humble 5.5mhash.
I am absolutely satisfied even after 2 days of mining. Even the website design is more than enough, just the info that is needed.
Hats off, will stay with my humble 5.5mhash.
April 22, 2013, 09:31:00 AM
Is the pool offline at the moment? I get page not available in Chrome.
April 22, 2013, 08:10:54 AM
Nice.
Anyway, an interesting solution would be to lock wallet address changes on any balances above zero, for users without 2FA. This way its guaranteed that any savings can't be redirected to a new address, in case of password theft. Only if the user logged with 2FA, would he be able to change the wallet address without any restriction.
Also, please remember to redirect ltcmine.ru:8080 or ltcmine.ru:443 to the stratum server. If you wish to support https further down for the web ui, then 8080 would be a safe choice.
Anyway, an interesting solution would be to lock wallet address changes on any balances above zero, for users without 2FA. This way its guaranteed that any savings can't be redirected to a new address, in case of password theft. Only if the user logged with 2FA, would he be able to change the wallet address without any restriction.
Also, please remember to redirect ltcmine.ru:8080 or ltcmine.ru:443 to the stratum server. If you wish to support https further down for the web ui, then 8080 would be a safe choice.
April 22, 2013, 06:49:08 AM
Vbs
No, it's PPS.
No, it's PPS.
April 22, 2013, 06:46:50 AM
can litecoin be mined with a mac computer by anychance i thought i read that it could is this true.
Technically yes, but most Macs don't have good airflow to remove the excess heat generated by mining, so unless you have a power Mac or a hackintosh in a case with good airflow, it's not recommended.
April 22, 2013, 06:29:25 AM
It's PPS, there is no rounds. Anyway, temporary codes it's the most logical solution, I think. Because it can be used for protecting other operations in the future, not only address change. 
Isn't the pool using RBPPS for payouts?
April 22, 2013, 04:53:13 AM
It's PPS, there is no rounds. Anyway, temporary codes it's the most logical solution, I think. Because it can be used for protecting other operations in the future, not only address change.
April 21, 2013, 11:32:22 PM
True, Keyloggers would get around this . I am paranoid when it comes to security and keyloggers are less common on linux but still exist..
If we wanted to be extra paranoid we could all use RSA Secure ID tokens for login :-)
. I am paranoid when it comes to security and keyloggers are less common on linux but still exist..If we wanted to be extra paranoid we could all use RSA Secure ID tokens for login :-)
But those can be stolen, so better to use a password, an RSA Secure ID token, and biometric ID.
But certainly not without you knowing!
Jump to: