[ANN] MasterDoge [MDOGE] | Scrypt | PoW/PoS | 100M| Much Master, Many Nodes. - page 3.

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: minerjoen on June 30, 2015, 03:40:15 AM

Quote from: AminerMiner on June 30, 2015, 03:28:19 AM

sheesh

yeah i only dont know where that is comming from haha, its not from the pools..
The only thing i do know is that something is really wrong in here Cheesy

The hashrate calculation (and therefore also the diff calculation) is totally wrong on this coin.

Don't believe the values.

I'm currently investigating what is going on and what is exactly "wrong" in the code but I have quite little time today. I'll report back when I know more.

I suggest not to invest a lot of money in mining this for obvious reasons.

minerjoen

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: AminerMiner on June 30, 2015, 03:28:19 AM

sheesh

yeah i only dont know where that is comming from haha, its not from the pools..
The only thing i do know is that something is really wrong in here Cheesy

AminerMiner

hero member

Activity: 591

Merit: 500

Why oh why Didnt i take the blue pill ?!?!

sheesh

stackoverflow

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Current Difficulty 20,304.27207874 Grin

This ain't moving this year!

proletariat

legendary

Activity: 1246

Merit: 1005

wow, scammers get more creative every week. So the latest is to fake huge hashrates and get people to pay for the immense cost of production.....? the fuck? Cheesy

thanks for posting pharma's pm btw.. whether you knew this or not Roll Eyes

is good to know there's a new trick around we should be wary of.

Quote from: TheMasterDoge on June 29, 2015, 07:15:10 PM

Quote from: Starin on June 29, 2015, 07:01:23 PM

Quote from: TheMasterDoge on June 29, 2015, 06:44:55 PM

Quote from: Starin on June 29, 2015, 06:24:57 PM

This is forked from XPH. And it did have some suspicious hash too. Makes you think.

Yes, we altered the XPH codebase which already had masternodes built in. Then again, every coin is a clone of another, did XPH have the patent rights over that paticular code base or something? Also, there was actually a two-hour pre-announcment prior to launching, giving miners and pools plenty of time prepare.
Lastly, we offer quite a generous buffet of possible bounties anyone can claim, miner, trader, or simple enthusiast. If you have any more questions, please feel free to post or PM me, thanks!

So the codebase creates wrong hashrate?
I am not blaming you, I thought xph had something fishy with it's codebase because of the huge hashrate.

Is this PM for real? LOL.

There has been no false creation of hash rate. It was the overwhelming amount of hashing very early in PoW that led to the issues we experienced earlier. We've manged to smoothly asscess it and are continuing forward. Yes; that PM is real, but really isn't important. You mentioned it and I saw it as an opportunity to clear the air in one response.

chickenfried12

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1003

Hi I tried to open the wallet and it says that the version is not compatible with my version of windows. It says to contact programmer about x32 or x64. I have ran many wallets and never had this error.. any ideals

pravin

full member

Activity: 120

Merit: 100

ok ,so everything now works fine.. spread some hash here guys.. http://hashgoal.com/pool/MDOG/

cryptoVIP

member

Activity: 79

Merit: 10

It's a mastershit actually. Cheesy

TheMasterDoge

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Starin on June 29, 2015, 07:01:23 PM

Quote from: TheMasterDoge on June 29, 2015, 06:44:55 PM

Quote from: Starin on June 29, 2015, 06:24:57 PM

This is forked from XPH. And it did have some suspicious hash too. Makes you think.

Yes, we altered the XPH codebase which already had masternodes built in. Then again, every coin is a clone of another, did XPH have the patent rights over that paticular code base or something? Also, there was actually a two-hour pre-announcment prior to launching, giving miners and pools plenty of time prepare.
Lastly, we offer quite a generous buffet of possible bounties anyone can claim, miner, trader, or simple enthusiast. If you have any more questions, please feel free to post or PM me, thanks!

So the codebase creates wrong hashrate?
I am not blaming you, I thought xph had something fishy with it's codebase because of the huge hashrate.

Is this PM for real? LOL.

There has been no false creation of hash rate. It was the overwhelming amount of hashing very early in PoW that led to the issues we experienced earlier. We've manged to smoothly asscess it and are continuing forward. Yes; that PM is real, but really isn't important. You mentioned it and I saw it as an opportunity to clear the air in one response.

notsofast

legendary

Activity: 1517

Merit: 1042

@notsofast

Quote from: TheMasterDoge on June 29, 2015, 06:44:55 PM

Quote from: Starin on June 29, 2015, 06:24:57 PM

This is forked from XPH. And it did have some suspicious hash too. Makes you think.

Yes, we altered the XPH codebase which already had masternodes built in. Then again, every coin is a clone of another, did XPH have the patent rights over that paticular code base or something? Also, there was actually a two-hour pre-announcment prior to launching, giving miners and pools plenty of time prepare.
Lastly, we offer quite a generous buffet of possible bounties anyone can claim, miner, trader, or simple enthusiast. If you have any more questions, please feel free to post or PM me, thanks!

Now this is quite interesting from the Pharma dev-- basically an admission there was no giant scrypt factory rented at all, just faked hashrate on the coin. Much as I suspected.

Starin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Infected Mushroom

Quote from: TheMasterDoge on June 29, 2015, 06:44:55 PM

Quote from: Starin on June 29, 2015, 06:24:57 PM

This is forked from XPH. And it did have some suspicious hash too. Makes you think.

Yes, we altered the XPH codebase which already had masternodes built in. Then again, every coin is a clone of another, did XPH have the patent rights over that paticular code base or something? Also, there was actually a two-hour pre-announcment prior to launching, giving miners and pools plenty of time prepare.
Lastly, we offer quite a generous buffet of possible bounties anyone can claim, miner, trader, or simple enthusiast. If you have any more questions, please feel free to post or PM me, thanks!

So the codebase creates wrong hashrate?
I am not blaming you, I thought xph had something fishy with it's codebase because of the huge hashrate.

Is this PM for real? LOL.

TheMasterDoge

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Starin on June 29, 2015, 06:24:57 PM

This is forked from XPH. And it did have some suspicious hash too. Makes you think.

Yes, we altered the XPH codebase which already had masternodes built in. Then again, every coin is a clone of another, did XPH have the patent rights over that paticular code base or something? Also, there was actually a two-hour pre-announcment prior to launching, giving miners and pools plenty of time prepare.
Lastly, we offer quite a generous buffet of possible bounties anyone can claim, miner, trader, or simple enthusiast. If you have any more questions, please feel free to post or PM me, thanks!

Starin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Infected Mushroom

This is forked from XPH. And it did have some suspicious hash too. Makes you think.

CryptoContender

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: nikl on June 29, 2015, 04:01:37 PM

Quote from: MisO69 on June 29, 2015, 02:39:17 PM

Quote from: TheMasterDoge on June 29, 2015, 01:45:27 PM

Thank you for your suggestion, I've began working on it. I'm contemplating a solution that won't just make the chain becoming stuck "less" likely, but certainly not likely. Open to suggestions, but as I said will try some various approaches.

So did someone actually put 500Gh on this coin or was it just the difficulty adjustment algo that made it go screwy like that? I'm thinking the latter is most likely. Can you just implement digi-shield or kgw?

Nobody ever put 500GHs on this coin and difficulty is not real. I have find many
blocks with 1.7 GHs when difficulty was 8000+. If it really was 8000+, it would
take me many hours to find a block, but I've find blocks every minute. But for some
reason pools can't find any block with more hashes.

It was more than 500 GHs; I think 1300ish GH/s at one point, or even higher.

I manged to screen capture while in the 715 GH/s range,
http://i.imgur.com/U4AP3dR.png
it was on http://hashgoal.com/pool/MDOG/

TheMasterDoge

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

To all who elected to complete a piece of the bounties, if you completed and delivered your work you've been compensated. If we neglected to send you your coins , please remind us and what you choose to do.

TheMasterDoge

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

blocks are moving, rewards are being granted. Let the mining continue.

nikl

hero member

Activity: 635

Merit: 500

Quote from: MisO69 on June 29, 2015, 02:39:17 PM

Quote from: TheMasterDoge on June 29, 2015, 01:45:27 PM

Thank you for your suggestion, I've began working on it. I'm contemplating a solution that won't just make the chain becoming stuck "less" likely, but certainly not likely. Open to suggestions, but as I said will try some various approaches.

So did someone actually put 500Gh on this coin or was it just the difficulty adjustment algo that made it go screwy like that? I'm thinking the latter is most likely. Can you just implement digi-shield or kgw?

Nobody ever put 500Gh on this coin and difficulty is not real. I have find many
blocks with 1.7 GHs when difficulty was 8000+. If it really was 8000+, it would
take me many hours to find a block, but I've find blocks every minute. But for some
reason pools can't find any block with more hashes.

HammyCoin

sr. member

Activity: 363

Merit: 250

The problem with the diff retarget is exactly the same as it has been with all these other fail launches lately, he has set the interval over which it calculates the difficulty to be too short. It should be 3-5 blocks' worth of time, not 1 block.

Talking about fixing this as though its some big compromise is ludicrous. Just fix it. 3-5 blocks for the adjustment period has worked for 1000 coins in the last year.

jambo110

legendary

Activity: 1311

Merit: 1003

Quote from: Starin on June 29, 2015, 03:49:03 PM

Quote from: TheMasterDoge on June 29, 2015, 03:44:43 PM

Quote from: jambo110 on June 29, 2015, 03:39:07 PM

why people chucking 100th miners on this ? zero rewards till block 1.44k hehe

POW Reward: Blocks 0-1440 : 0 MDOGE, Blocks 1441-10080 : 10000 MDOGE

Please do not spread false information, the reward is 5000 MDOGE starting from block 2.

You forgot to change the readme.md, those info are from there.

So who is correct ?

Starin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Infected Mushroom

Quote from: TheMasterDoge on June 29, 2015, 03:44:43 PM

Quote from: jambo110 on June 29, 2015, 03:39:07 PM

why people chucking 100th miners on this ? zero rewards till block 1.44k hehe

POW Reward: Blocks 0-1440 : 0 MDOGE, Blocks 1441-10080 : 10000 MDOGE

Please do not spread false information, the reward is 5000 MDOGE starting from block 2.

You forgot to change the readme.md, those info are from there.

Topic: [ANN] MasterDoge [MDOGE] | Scrypt | PoW/PoS | 100M| Much Master, Many Nodes. - page 3. (Read 10331 times)