Topic: [ANN] MemoryCoin | CPU Coin | Paid Dev Team | Limited Supply [MMC] - page 31. (Read 281387 times)
December 26, 2013, 08:51:18 AM
I got a 3570k @ 4.4GHz = 2.36hpm
December 26, 2013, 08:49:23 AM
Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
<Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?
mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.
Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.
I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.
Got nothing else running that appears to be taking up any cycles. If it is low, I'm not sure what else it could be.
It's not low.
Ah ok. I'm used to khash rates.
December 26, 2013, 08:47:21 AM
And the Amazon ec2 cc2.8 Large
[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
Not bad.
[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
Not bad.
December 26, 2013, 08:44:26 AM
Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
<Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?
mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.
Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.
I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.
Got nothing else running that appears to be taking up any cycles. If it is low, I'm not sure what else it could be.
It's not low.
December 26, 2013, 08:38:52 AM
Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
<Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?
mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.
Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.
I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.
Got nothing else running that appears to be taking up any cycles. If it is low, I'm not sure what else it could be.
December 26, 2013, 08:38:07 AM
About to add the results of a Amazon cc2.8 large instance.
December 26, 2013, 08:34:23 AM
My 3570k gets around 2hpm. I think it's running at stock speed, but I can't say for sure at the moment because I'm not at home.
December 26, 2013, 08:30:09 AM
Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
<Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right?
mmm that seems a tad low (just a gut feeling), i am overspeccing my --thread count due to the miner not liking non-multiple-of-2 core counts.
Ensure that there are no other "heavy" processes running in the background, like say a wallet.
I would think that 3570k @ 4.2 could break at least 3 HPM.
December 26, 2013, 08:27:51 AM
Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
Should benefit quite a bit. I am not sure there are even diminished returns on more clock speed.
Here are some stats from a few of my CPUs:
x5650 @3.4ghz
[07:22:29] Found solution - 11760 / 1968 / 1636249367
[07:22:33] Found share ...f51fe0ced4a01e4f: submitting
[07:22:33] Stats: 4.512 hash/min
[07:22:36] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
x2 L5639 Xeons @ 2.4ghz
[07:20:35] Found solution - 10299 / 1968 / 1324839730
[07:20:51] Stats: 3.079 hash/min
3770k @4.6ghz
[07:23:35] Found share ...1ceb46262d62062a: submitting
[07:23:35] Stats: 4.158 hash/min
[07:23:39] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
Note that the 6/12 core X5650 @ 3.4ghz is matching the 4/8 core 3770k @ 4.6ghz.
Seem to be getting an average 2.0 hash/min. Does that sound right? I set Minerd to 4 threads.
December 26, 2013, 08:20:06 AM
Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
Should benefit quite a bit. I am not sure there are even diminished returns on more clock speed.
Here are some stats from a few of my CPUs:
Amazon cc2.8 Large
[13:45:43] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[13:45:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
x5650 @3.4ghz
[07:22:29] Found solution - 11760 / 1968 / 1636249367
[07:22:33] Found share ...f51fe0ced4a01e4f: submitting
[07:22:33] Stats: 4.512 hash/min
[07:22:36] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
x2 L5639 Xeons @ 2.4ghz
[07:20:35] Found solution - 10299 / 1968 / 1324839730
[07:20:51] Stats: 3.079 hash/min
3770k @4.6ghz
[07:23:35] Found share ...1ceb46262d62062a: submitting
[07:23:35] Stats: 4.158 hash/min
[07:23:39] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
Note that the 6/12 core X5650 @ 3.4ghz is matching the 4/8 core 3770k @ 4.6ghz.
December 26, 2013, 08:17:41 AM
Seems interesting. I'll give it a go. I have an i5 3550k overclocked to 4.2ghz. Will the overclock benefit?
December 26, 2013, 08:08:20 AM
I just posted my application for CSO.
My plan is to create a team of supporters, so there's always someone available.
More info here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1653
My plan is to create a team of supporters, so there's always someone available.
More info here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1653
December 26, 2013, 07:54:01 AM
Just checked all my cpu's, they all don't support AES-NI. This coin is just only for newer CPU's. Can't afford to buy new cpu's at the moment, so it's useless to mine for me at the moment.
That's not the cause. Older CPUs will only be slower but must still be able to calculate hashes. You have some software problem or faulty hardware.
Try this:
minerd.exe --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user *your MMC address* --threads 4
My hardware and software is fine for other cpu mining, ie. PTS, XPM, scrypt jane, etc. This is the first time I ever had an issue cpu mining.
If you see in my older posts, I did have the cmd line done right for the bat file. Might be an issue with the bigger miners finding shares too fast for my cpu's to compete.
I use two regular PC's 2-3 years old... and they mine OK.
December 26, 2013, 07:50:01 AM
When using the mmc2.0 minerd cpu miner, you *must* set your --thread parameter to a power of 2. (2,4,8,16,32 etc)
I have a dual 6c/12T xeon machine, and it would not run if i set each batch file --thread parameter to 12 to match the logical cores.
Setting it to --thread 16 per batch file worked and didnt appear to inhibit the performance of each node, even though each node was overspecced 4 threads.
I have a dual 6c/12T xeon machine, and it would not run if i set each batch file --thread parameter to 12 to match the logical cores.
Setting it to --thread 16 per batch file worked and didnt appear to inhibit the performance of each node, even though each node was overspecced 4 threads.
December 26, 2013, 07:46:57 AM
Just checked all my cpu's, they all don't support AES-NI. This coin is just only for newer CPU's. Can't afford to buy new cpu's at the moment, so it's useless to mine for me at the moment.
That's not the cause. Older CPUs will only be slower but must still be able to calculate hashes. You have some software problem or faulty hardware.
Try this:
minerd.exe --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user *your MMC address* --threads 4
Confirm. I try to load my i7 930 (no AES) and it shows 0.8 hpm. Still overwatch it.
December 26, 2013, 07:39:09 AM
Just checked all my cpu's, they all don't support AES-NI. This coin is just only for newer CPU's. Can't afford to buy new cpu's at the moment, so it's useless to mine for me at the moment.
That's not the cause. Older CPUs will only be slower but must still be able to calculate hashes. You have some software problem or faulty hardware.
Try this:
minerd.exe --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user *your MMC address* --threads 4
My hardware and software is fine for other cpu mining, ie. PTS, XPM, scrypt jane, etc. This is the first time I ever had an issue cpu mining.
If you see in my older posts, I did have the cmd line done right for the bat file. Might be an issue with the bigger miners finding shares too fast for my cpu's to compete.
December 26, 2013, 07:21:18 AM
this coin is a waste of time/energy, but i'll keep at last 1 MMC in my wallet for the future, next time when you dev's release your coins please be "More Democratic" and less centralized LOL
December 26, 2013, 07:10:08 AM
Just checked all my cpu's, they all don't support AES-NI. This coin is just only for newer CPU's. Can't afford to buy new cpu's at the moment, so it's useless to mine for me at the moment.
That's not the cause. Older CPUs will only be slower but must still be able to calculate hashes. You have some software problem or faulty hardware.
Try this:
minerd.exe --url http://work.mmcpool.com/ --user *your MMC address* --threads 4
December 26, 2013, 07:08:05 AM
This is kind of sucking. I'm finding shares, but every single one is getting rejected. 
It must be some kind of problem... what setup do you use? win32 or 64?
Win64. This is my setup: minerd.exe --url http://work.mmcpool.com:80 --user M92QAURY1e4BsoDdqx5pKeS7UJi6zUHv6H --pass x --threads 4
Your CPU might not support AES, what model is your CPU?
Phenom II x4 820 and 3x Core2 Quad Q6600's. They should, I know they don't perform great like the newer cpu's, but I'm on a budget for cpu mining.
Core2 Quad Q6600 doesn't support AES-NI.
Just checked all my cpu's, they all don't support AES-NI. This coin is just only for newer CPU's. Can't afford to buy new cpu's at the moment, so it's useless to mine for me at the moment.
December 26, 2013, 07:01:58 AM
This is kind of sucking. I'm finding shares, but every single one is getting rejected.
It must be some kind of problem... what setup do you use? win32 or 64?
Win64. This is my setup: minerd.exe --url http://work.mmcpool.com:80 --user M92QAURY1e4BsoDdqx5pKeS7UJi6zUHv6H --pass x --threads 4
Your CPU might not support AES, what model is your CPU?
Phenom II x4 820 and 3x Core2 Quad Q6600's. They should, I know they don't perform great like the newer cpu's, but I'm on a budget for cpu mining.
Core2 Quad Q6600 doesn't support AES-NI.
Just checked all my cpu's, they all don't support AES-NI. This coin is just only for newer CPU's. Can't afford to buy new cpu's at the moment, so it's useless to mine for me at the moment.
Jump to: