[ANN] MemoryCoin | CPU Coin | Paid Dev Team | Limited Supply [MMC] - page 85.

soothaa

hero member

Activity: 1151

Merit: 528

Man, been hashing away with 5 per minute and found nothing in hours :/

Kelekin

member

Activity: 60

Merit: 10

I figure I'd ask again because I don't believe I ever got a reply - when I try to put any processes (1-4) set to mine this coin, it turns my ASICs into Zombies (which are mining bitcoin). This has never happened with any coin I have ever mined; is there a potential reason for this?

Fletch

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

I'll have a steak sandwich and a... steak sandwich

I can understand the reasoning behind transferring transactions from MemoryCoin 1.0 over to this block chain, but I don't understand the ProtoShares thing. If I own 100 PTS, I can import that wallet.dat and I get 10 MMC? Why?

radiumsoup

sr. member

Activity: 356

Merit: 255

Quote from: barwizi on December 16, 2013, 04:47:39 PM

Quote from: FreeTrade on December 16, 2013, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: Sharky444 on December 16, 2013, 04:30:33 PM

Mining block 295 since 30 minutes. I guess 296 will be mined in 1 minute, and 297 again in 30-60.

Yes, this difficulty algorithm is going to need to be addressed. I'm looking at options now.

even though i am empty handed, i think this should be left as is, the whole point of currency is that it should be scarce. The 10 PTS trade off is now justifiable. tampering with it at this point would discredit the honour system for those who did import some coins.

I think instead focusing on an optimized miner may help distribution, maybe even a pool over the weekend.

Fixing the difficulty adjustment algo won't change the scarcity - it will make the difficulty adjustments more linear instead of hopping around so wildly. There's currently simply too few data points being used for the calculation, which skews the average badly. With more data points to calculate from, the curve will be much smoother and predictable. It won't (shouldn't) change the number of blocks per hour.

mux

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Quote from: FreeTrade on December 16, 2013, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: Sharky444 on December 16, 2013, 04:30:33 PM

Mining block 295 since 30 minutes. I guess 296 will be mined in 1 minute, and 297 again in 30-60.

Yes, this difficulty algorithm is going to need to be addressed. I'm looking at options now.

What's fun is that with this difficulty algorithm, mining speed can be compared to the speed of a object in elliptic orbit trying to escape a planet attraction:
- On low orbit/high speed: motors at full throttle, accelerating (miners firing up mining machines, accelerating)
- On high orbit/low speed: motors shut down (miners shutting down machines, waiting for the more profitable high mining speed times).
And after each cycle, the elliptic nature of the orbit get more pronounced.

If the difficulty algorithm stays as it is now, I would forecast profitable mining periods of only 30 minutes every few days, and still spacing up =)

delta123

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

./bitcoind getinfo
{
"version" : 85200,
"protocolversion" : 70001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 2.69230769,
"blocks" : 240,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00000097,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1387117140,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}

after small time
./bitcoind getinfo
error: {"code":-1,"message":"CDB() : can't open database file wallet.dat, error -30974"}

...

barwizi

legendary

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: FreeTrade on December 16, 2013, 04:38:53 PM

Quote from: Sharky444 on December 16, 2013, 04:30:33 PM

Mining block 295 since 30 minutes. I guess 296 will be mined in 1 minute, and 297 again in 30-60.

Yes, this difficulty algorithm is going to need to be addressed. I'm looking at options now.

even though i am empty handed, i think this should be left as is, the whole point of currency is that it should be scarce. The 10 PTS trade off is now justifiable. tampering with it at this point would discredit the honour system for those who did import some coins.

I think instead focusing on an optimized miner may help distribution, maybe even a pool over the weekend.

pgbit

sr. member

Activity: 771

Merit: 258

Trident Protocol | Simple «buy-hold-earn» system!

I get an error trying to load the client - it gets stuck on "Verifying Blocks..." stage and refuses to load. Anyone any idea what this is?

Sharky444

hero member

Activity: 724

Merit: 500

Mortimer, restart the client with the lower block count. It helped here.

Mortimer452

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

OK, so I have the qt running on two machines . . .

Getmining info reads this one machine:

{
"blocks" : 295,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00001474,
"errors" : "",
"genproclimit" : 10,
"hashespermin" : 1.06024301,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

And it reads this on the other machine:

{
"blocks" : 294,
"currentblocksize" : 1486,
"currentblocktx" : 2,
"difficulty" : 0.00001179,
"errors" : "",
"genproclimit" : 4,
"hashespermin" : 0.61135282,
"pooledtx" : 2,
"testnet" : false
}

Both clients say they are synchtonized, what gives? How can they be working on different blocks? And at different difficulties?

FreeTrade

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1030

Quote from: Sharky444 on December 16, 2013, 04:30:33 PM

Mining block 295 since 30 minutes. I guess 296 will be mined in 1 minute, and 297 again in 30-60.

Yes, this difficulty algorithm is going to need to be addressed. I'm looking at options now.

l3jmr

member

Activity: 99

Merit: 10

yea very strange is it just me or did difficulty spike for about 8x ?

Sharky444

hero member

Activity: 724

Merit: 500

Mining block 295 since 30 minutes. I guess 296 will be mined in 1 minute, and 297 again in 30-60.

pvaladares

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

"Imagination is more important than knowledge"

Quote from: FreeTrade on December 15, 2013, 03:45:47 PM

Quote from: pvaladares on December 15, 2013, 03:40:22 PM

I can run the client under 32-bit (Windows 7), but I cannot run in mining mode since it crashes.

How much memory you got in those machines? what error are you getting?

The error just says to contact the dev team.

Sharky444

hero member

Activity: 724

Merit: 500

May the crashes somehow be related to the warning bitcoind gives out every time on start (Ubuntu linux)?

bitcoind: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by bitcoind)
bitcoind: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0)
bitcoind: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0)
bitcoind: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0)

p.s.

A fork of the coin with averaging difficulty over 6 blocks may be a good idea.

warzonevi

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Long time lurker first time poster, how would I know if I was on the correct MMC? As I mined a block last night (which somehow woke me up from my sleep, must have been excited - fyi live in Australia) - I can't seem to find a block explorer to confirm the block I have is live/correct. I have deleted all the database/files except wallet.dat and reloaded block chain, and re-downloaded the binary So I would assume I am on the correct version (2.0) however any way to tell?

itsik78

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100