Topic: [ANN] [MNY] [ICO]: MONKEY CAPITAL INITIAL COIN OFFERING - page 4. (Read 1142 times)

Possibly true - this is an informational (vs. promotional) announcement however primarily aimed at fine-tuning aspects of the content on it prior to full-on promo. Go to www.dunaton.com for more - you'll find 3 White Papers there. Should be enough info!!

your announcement looks terrible, almost no information in it. the link to the site does not work, I wonder what it's connected with and where can I find out more about the project?

Yah. Endorsements really do not come any higher than McAffee in crypto, that's very true.

So so impressive. Very excited for this project! McAffee right from the outset is about as big as it gets!!

John has a great eye for market-beating products, that's why 

One of your Metacurrencies projects just got the official seal of approval  

you should go to www.dunaton.com and the meta is on sale via the smart contract. It is currently about $2 but next level is about $3.80. Eventually it will rise to $9000 at the last level and all the tokens are support by real cash that you can exchange the META for if you want. This is why this will fly very high when people knows this fact I think. The object is to create 3D currency not for typical ico reason

It is a really good project. I like and want to participate in this project.

yes the concept of value on blockchain is the great unexplored area!

I like the concept and I think this project will have a big future . I'll support as far as possible

In fact, Bounty is very real so we will look forward to making Bounty payment for hard worker you know, you are the only one with the Scandinavian illness I believe. Too sad. Find some task to do not just to sue people for your own mistakes. It cannot help friend

Blatantly Daniel posting. Hi Dan! Can I name the next company when this one fails. I thought you fell short on Factory Banking.

This one is even worse.

Creating a new company every 2-3 months is not progress. It’s utter failure. Everyone associated with this company is either fake or Suffering from Stockholm syndrome

Thank you for a well-reasoned and fair response. This goes to show that the project is not all about Daniel, and in fact, it is quite insulting to the rest of us who also dedicate hours and hours of time and sweat/blood/tears when it is implied that this is the case.

I wonder how many people in Blockchain actually know that innovation is not a "reasonable" business, and nor is it one that is undertaken in a "reasonable" way (at least, not if it is successful at all in any way). As a consequence, the most "reasonable" ICOs that you see out there will amount to next to nothing. That this will amount to something is evidenced by nothing less than the most unreasonable level of persistence and commitment from the two Founders, in my honest opinion (and yes, the most unreasonable of attitudes sometimes go with those unreasonable levels of persistence, too!)

But implying that employees are unpaid, investors are left hanging with nothing or any other sort of thing is so simply false - and this is coming direct from one of "the employees" - that to suggest such is a mere lie. No, this isn't kindergarten and you don't get your hand held. No, no one is going to congenially make out like your feelings matter. That's because they do not. That is just the culture of the firm that Craig and Daniel are building. But you get paid, you get to take on interesting challenges, and as Daniel once put it to us, "you get to say fuck you to whoever you want when it's all done, since no one else could fucking come close to matching what we're doing here." And what's is that which we are "doing here", exactly?

It's putting value on the Blockchain for the first EVER time in history and in the process, creating new mechanisms by which value will be used to finance industry, households and even everyday life, right down to how students manage their college debt. I think I speak for pretty much all of those of us who work for Craig and Daniel, that these results constitute such potentially life-altering achievements on a personal level for each and every one of us (again, not JUST for Craig and Daniel) that nothing comes close to even getting there in terms of dissuading us to battle on and win our way through another day's gruelling work schedule.

Dunaton (and by association Monkey Capital) will be one of those rare companies that emerge from all this as an Amazon, Google, Facebook, or any other of those early 00s dot com market dominators today. Same culture, same clues, same class ...

IF there is anyone who would actually have a semi-logical reason to speak against Daniel then ill claim it would be me.

And i am not and wont be doing so.
All this project does is show continuouss progress, anyone who could not clearly identify that by now is simply and i must also add (quite obviously) trying to down talk the project for no other reason than personal hate. Is there anything that actually can be done for the 2, or what was it 3? of you to finally call it quit and accept the actual progress and innovation that is being and has been presented?

Also, FUTR and FUTX are in fact the only crypto with identifiable value: FUTX has $32,802.99 of intrinsic value using a conversion rate for ETH of $683.05/ETH and FUTR of $101,362.68 (at the same conversion rate for ETH/USD). This is something called intrinsic value but you obviously don't understand what intrinsic value is so I highly doubt you will understand Metacurrencies ... better go back to the beach over there in Florida, Cuck! Take the Lambo with you, since we all know that is what classy men who women all dream of marrying one day look like: lonely Florida bums in Lambos (or wannabe-Lambos). Sorry to break it to you, but there is a real world out there too!

Hi Lambo Cuck - no  one is posting under fake accounts. This is not Daniel Harrison, it's one of the three people who monitor and answer actively Dunaton's social media (no, I am not going to give a loony like you my name but thanks! Also, not everyone like you is sitting in their bedroom; some of us do have offices to go to!) It must be said, Daniel and Craig are both very hands-on (in different ways) and that is why we are all getting back our value that we originally invested in. They are - in different ways again - good employers, and good caretakers of a business, so insinuating anything other than that is the case is just plain libellous in my view. But you take your own chances.

I must say, it does seem a little obsessive your interest in this whole project. Your interest and the intermittent nature of your posting on other topics elsewhere and given the gap in posting Nov-Dec and subsequent eagerness to explode all over the show with the rather grandiose Silver Miller law suit  (at the office we call them Sleazy & Motherf&*er btw; that was Daniel who made that one up, I think ) makes me wonder if you and Oddin are none other than S&M who purchased two accounts to play about on so that you can induce all the FUD you need to carry on your legal case. At the very very least, you are surely the plaintiffs, and that makes me wonder admittedly from my very rudimentary Bachelor's Degree in Law & Philosophy training at a respectable school here in London whether you are not transgressing any number of, I'd say, possibly 3-4 international, British and no doubt Federal laws right now with the ongoing harassment you insist on keeping up.

So I guess my point is ... keep it up but do be mindful there is a price to pay for everything ...    

Daniel Harrison stop posting under fake accounts and making new scam projects

Also pay back the 100k you owe your assistant in Singapore

Daniel Cocaine Harrison - creator of

MNY/COE/ZURWAVES/PRE/PVT/PLC/COA/FUTX/FUTR among other valueless coins

Also NB two other recent press mentions - From NewsBTC here https://www.newsbtc.com/2018/04/24/why-invest-ethereum/:

<>

Also from Bitcoinist here: http://bitcoinist.com/why-invest-in-ethereum/:

<>

and our updated blog on finishing the Monkey Capital project off here https://cryptocurrencyhub.io/building-the-decentralised-marketplace-fbfbacc67339:

<
The reason we were opposed to securitisation of decentralised assets from the very start was simple: securitisation runs against the whole ethos of decentralisation, which is rooted in management-controlled value parameters. The decentralisation of returns has led to some almost unbelievable wealth-creating effects. To list the top 3 assets: Bitcoin began trading at a price of 10 cents in 2010 and is now around $9,000, representing a return of 9,000,000%; Ethereum was first offered at 14 cents in 2014 and can now be readily purchased or sold 430,000% higher at around $600 each; Ripple began trading at half a basis point (0.005 cents) in 2013 and currently sells for 90 cents per XRP, representing a 17,900% gain with around 15% of that having materialized in the past 12 months alone.

When compared alongside securitised returns, there is almost no argument in favour of adopting the latter as a comparable investment return asset class, let alone including securities in the same domain of value as decentralised ones. If securities are included among Blockchain assets, you can expect to see similar returns to those that are presently traded elsewhere on securities exchanges. During 2017, the top 3 performing stock exchanges comprised Argentina’s Merval Index, up 77%, The Nigeria All-Share Index, which was 42% higher and Turkey’s Borsa Istanbul, with 42% improvement over the previous year. Even if we average these three top-performing indexes and multiply the cumulative returns over the same time period as for our digital asset comparison pairs (which is optimistic at best) there is nowhere near the same sort of return profile among securities assets as there is for decentralised ones.

We are dumbfounded when we hear that teams are lining up to offer dividend-enhanced securities on the Blockchain, and that customers actually want such products. The only affect that putting securities on the Blockchain will have is to lower the average return by a massive factor, so that digital payment utility value as a market becomes virtually unrecognizable and fails to do what it does so well today, which is make investors incredibly high returns without the requirement for a large upfront capital investment.

With both these arguments in mind, what appealed to us was the idea that we could somehow take the best from the exponentially-growing digital payments market and the best from the world of products which have tangible values, and formulate a new sort of asset class that would somehow work exactly like a payment tool and thereby remain non-securitised and unhindered by the continual interference of senior management teams and Board directors, while benefitting somehow from the soundness of underlying value that was sourced outside of the world of digital payments upon which these hybrid assets would draw their own values rooted in tangible values.

Brazen as we were, we seriously miscalculated the amount of work involved in achieving such an aim, let alone establishing a decentralised pool of such assets which digital payment asset holders could access on a whim.

The ICO of MNY was subsequently cancelled to a degree of angry by overall supportive investors. In order to buy time to find the potential solution while still keeping the market we had prematurely fostered active, we offered for sale a variety of digital assets for sale which we advertised with the proposed benefit of such assets becoming ultimately convertible into a brand-new COE/MNY token combination. Needless to say, we ended up trying the already shattered patience of the last of our remaining supporters beyond an acceptable threshold. It was not the finest moment in management history.

Meanwhile, however, as we wound down the previous market we had clung onto over a period of 6 months, we sought to find the answer to the problem we had set out so brazenly self-assured would take us just a few weeks to discover: how is it possible to represent real, tangible, growth and income-supported value on the Blockchain without tripping up over securities regulators?

To date, no one has managed to solve that particular puzzle; instead, eager to enhance their payment utility tokens with real value, many ICOs offer all sorts of dividend-equivalent features within their digital asset promotions, most of which are quite illegal to offer in the places they are advertised and sold.

We emphasize here that we had no aversion to dealing with securities regulators other than that they were not responsible — and are still not responsible — for overseeing the sorts of assets we were seeking to create and invest in.

The sorts of assets we had in mind still had the return profiles of Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple; they just happened to share the value foundations of Apple, Microsoft and Berkshire Hathaway as well. The plan of allowing investors to cumulatively participate in a passively-administered decentralised (digital asset entry-based) fund was looking a lot harder than we at first imagined.

For a short while our dreams of creating a decentralised hedge fund looked like wishful thinking and worst of all, wasted time and money. However, as we began working with some financial advisors on various side projects in London, we began to formulate a way in which such assets could be constructed.

As we proceeded with this new line of enquiry, we realised in so doing that we would need to build a marketplace for these new hybrid payment utility-income value derivative assets in order to maximize their potential.

We realised that what we had to do was build a marketplace for our decentralised fund to invest into — after all, without a market, how does the fund make money?

We called our new value-loaded digital assets Metacurrencies, or three-dimensional currencies, due to their dual status at both digital payment utilities and digital assets that held a form of referenced income value. We wrote a paper. No one bothered reading it except the lawyer, who read it cover to cover. That was usually a bad sign.

Amazingly however, none of the lawyers complained. We knew this was as good a starting point as we were likely to encounter any time soon. We also knew we by now understood the process inside-out to a somewhat unhealthy degree.

“Basically, what we are doing is building the closest thing to a security without it being a security,” explained one of our legal advisors to a fellow lawyer in one conference we sat in. “What is it then?” asked the fellow lawyer in response. “That’s a very good question. It’s a cryptocurrency with actual value,” replied our legal eagle. We were finally getting somewhere.

As we made headway in laying the foundations of the marketplace we would build for our Metacurrencies alongside our slowly-expanding team of advisors, partners and other industry and market professionals, privately the Founders circled back to the original aim of creating a decentralised hedge fund.

After all, a decentralised digital capital asset market was beginning to take shape now; a decentralised hedge fund was surely entirely plausible.

Partly, we confess, this circling back was something we were forced to do as a result of having so many now exasperated, dispirited or plain disinterested investors to make good on from our somewhat ill-advised entry to the cryptocurrency market from the year before.

Metacurrencies are a major step in value innovation of digital assets. They provide the purchaser with the assurance of real base value that can be obtained with the unregulated non-securitised asset of hyper-inflated value that they are hoping to extract unusually high returns from. They are, in a sense, the best of cryptocurrencies with the best of securities values referenced inside their exchangeable values.

Despite the odds against race, the birth of non-securitised asset structuring on a digital distributed and the concurrent establishment of unregulated, non-securitised asset management functions is now taking place in the start of the second quarter of 2018.

We may have been a little late to get to the party, but then again, we cannot help but notice either that we are still the first to have arrived here.>>

It has the hugest potential; it can literally be number 1! ESP with metas. At least top 10.