Because 100 m tokens in total yet only 70m for this crowdsale...so the amount of CURRENT NOT TIMESTAMPED value invested into the crowdfund will only be for 70/100m...i believe that's
So if investors think that one token out of 70m is worth .60+ cents (why else would they invest) then naturally it IS worth that.
After the crowdsale the price of the remaining 30m tokens equals whatever price the crowdfund settled at current value, because that's clearly the value we, the market, have agreed upon otherwise if we didn't we wouldn't have invested for A SHARE OF 70m tokens with a pot of like 42m and growing.
It could be wrong but considering the 30m tokens aren't part of this funding (other than some of the bounty) I don't understand HOW they can be taken into account when determining the price currently.
What the problem here is conflicting info and that info being nonsensical. if we aren't entitled to invest into the other 30 million coins through the ICO, then why would we count them into the equation of how much money is raised towards the 70 million investors are entitled to donate to?
Jack confirmed on slack, its based on 70M