how much target minimum in ico selling dev
and early ico sellingn in 25 april, and how long process in ico selling one month
and how much price mobilego
Topic: [ANN] MOBILEGO Crowdfund [$53 Million] - Decentralized Mobile Gaming Solutions - page 446. (Read 406984 times)
March 08, 2017, 04:02:59 PM
March 08, 2017, 03:44:02 PM
MobileGo added to http://icocountdown.com
Never miss a crowdsale again!
https://twitter.com/ICOcountdown/status/839574892299304965
Never miss a crowdsale again!
https://twitter.com/ICOcountdown/status/839574892299304965
Real happy to see this!
It's good for marketing the project and also adds the ICO countdown stamp of approval.
March 08, 2017, 03:41:47 PM
MobileGo added to http://icocountdown.com
Never miss a crowdsale again!
https://twitter.com/ICOcountdown/status/839574892299304965
Never miss a crowdsale again!
https://twitter.com/ICOcountdown/status/839574892299304965
March 08, 2017, 01:04:27 PM
In Conversation with Jon Comer, the CMO of Gamecredits, a Decentralised Mobile Gaming Store
NewsBTC Article Link: http://bit.ly/2mD3tYV
NewsBTC Article Link: http://bit.ly/2mD3tYV
Hi
Great article to read.
Easy explanation for ordinary user to understand MobileGo! A simple but very informative piece. Personally enjoyed every bit of information provided by Jon Comer! Hopefully we will able to see his vission as a reality!
Thanks
March 08, 2017, 12:56:42 PM
Coming from GameCredits, I'm confident about MobileGO. When will the Crowdfund be coming up? Will like to be part of this.
The Crowdfund will start April 25th and run for 1 month. You can invest using GAME, ETH, BTC, WAVES, and Fiat.Let's goooooooooo. Time to build up my BTC so I can put it all down lmao. Super excited about this endeavor.
Will there be deposit bonuses for those who buy in early? Like 20% bonus if you invest in the first week of the crowdfund or whatnot?
March 08, 2017, 12:41:24 PM
Yep, i hope so the first day of Mobilego crowdsale will be provided bonuses to participants 
March 08, 2017, 12:29:51 PM
Coming from GameCredits, I'm confident about MobileGO. When will the Crowdfund be coming up? Will like to be part of this.
The Crowdfund will start April 25th and run for 1 month. You can invest using GAME, ETH, BTC, WAVES, and Fiat.Let's goooooooooo. Time to build up my BTC so I can put it all down lmao. Super excited about this endeavor.
Will there be deposit bonuses for those who buy in early? Like 20% bonus if you invest in the first week of the crowdfund or whatnot?
March 07, 2017, 06:27:09 PM
In Conversation with Jon Comer, the CMO of Gamecredits, a Decentralised Mobile Gaming Store
NewsBTC Article Link: http://bit.ly/2mD3tYV
NewsBTC Article Link: http://bit.ly/2mD3tYV
March 07, 2017, 06:23:43 PM
Looking forward how this project is developing.
When ICO is live i going throw a few € in it. This project have potential and it is something what crypto needs for further adoption.
The gamingeconomy is big and is still growing.
Have a nice day
When ICO is live i going throw a few € in it. This project have potential and it is something what crypto needs for further adoption.
The gamingeconomy is big and is still growing.
Have a nice day
March 07, 2017, 05:40:00 PM
Joined this awesome project! I am a gamer, I support projects that would take a gaming industry to another level
March 07, 2017, 05:22:34 PM
Let's be correct in your statements, reduce aggression and let's me know where is my "fundamental misunderstandings", "false assumptions" etc. exactly. I understand that you are worried about the project and believe in it... well, I'm happy for you and I wish you to achieve your goals, while leaving me the right to have my own point of view.
In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.
In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.
You're allowed to have your opinion, and Jon wasn't telling you not to. What concerns people is that you aren't providing a reasoning for your scores. Like, for instance we have a 0 in escrow. We signed an Escrow deal and will be having vetted third party professionals handle investors finances. After speaking with Sergey, I find it hard to believe he didn't mention this fact to you. However, you said that even after the interview your opinion hadn't changed. That's pretty strange.
Second of all, our roadmap is quite clear, and our main product where MobileGo will launch is completed. Our Mobile Store will launch before the end of the Crowdfund (like Jon said), meaning for perhaps the first time in crypto history investors don't have to wait months or even a year till after funding to see a product. They will be investing in something that has hit the market, so there's less speculation and concerns about failing to develop.
It's great that you're taking the time to review projects like MobileGo, but saying you have a team that makes decisions doesn't provide any clarity. For all anyone knows you could be making that up and you decide based on arbitrary information.
I get the impression that my "Russian English" is so bad that does not reflect the essence of what was said.
Ok. We will raise the issue of the correctness of MobileGo evaluation at our next team meeting. Thank you for your criticism.
March 07, 2017, 05:03:51 PM
Let's be correct in your statements, reduce aggression and let's me know where is my "fundamental misunderstandings", "false assumptions" etc. exactly. I understand that you are worried about the project and believe in it... well, I'm happy for you and I wish you to achieve your goals, while leaving me the right to have my own point of view.
In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.
In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.
You're allowed to have your opinion, and Jon wasn't telling you not to. What concerns people is that you aren't providing a reasoning for your scores. Like, for instance we have a 0 in escrow. We signed an Escrow deal and will be having vetted third party professionals handle investors finances. After speaking with Sergey, I find it hard to believe he didn't mention this fact to you. However, you said that even after the interview your opinion hadn't changed. That's pretty strange.
Second of all, our roadmap is quite clear, and our main product where MobileGo will launch is completed. Our Mobile Store will launch before the end of the Crowdfund (like Jon said), meaning for perhaps the first time in crypto history investors don't have to wait months or even a year till after funding to see a product. They will be investing in something that has hit the market, so there's less speculation and concerns about failing to develop.
It's great that you're taking the time to review projects like MobileGo, but saying you have a team that makes decisions doesn't provide any clarity. For all anyone knows you could be making that up and you decide based on arbitrary information.
March 07, 2017, 04:35:26 PM
Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.
After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?
We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.
After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?
We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.
Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.
I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.
About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about
Exactly. Back up your opinion with facts. Because right now you haven't offered one fact to back up your opinion. All we know is that you had fundamental misunderstandings about the project when you did the score. If you haven't changed your opinion after having your false assumptions corrected, then that just undermines your own credibility and the credibility of your site.
For instance, you score the roadmap as a 2. This is a joke honestly. I have invested in over 15 ICOs and MobileGo has the best roadmap of any I have ever seen. The core products have been in development already for 2 years and are going to be released BEFORE the ICO ends. Give me one example of another ICO currently coming out in the next 3 months that can say the same thing?
At this point, you probably have your feelings hurt, but your review says much more about your project than it does MobileGo.
Let's be correct in your statements, reduce aggression and let's me know where is my "fundamental misunderstandings", "false assumptions" etc. exactly. I understand that you are worried about the project and believe in it... well, I'm happy for you and I wish you to achieve your goals, while leaving me the right to have my own point of view.
In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.
March 07, 2017, 02:49:46 PM
Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.
After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?
We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.
After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?
We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.
Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.
I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.
About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about
Exactly. Back up your opinion with facts. Because right now you haven't offered one fact to back up your opinion. All we know is that you had fundamental misunderstandings about the project when you did the score. If you haven't changed your opinion after having your false assumptions corrected, then that just undermines your own credibility and the credibility of your site.
For instance, you score the roadmap as a 2. This is a joke honestly. I have invested in over 15 ICOs and MobileGo has the best roadmap of any I have ever seen. The core products have been in development already for 2 years and are going to be released BEFORE the ICO ends. Give me one example of another ICO currently coming out in the next 3 months that can say the same thing?
At this point, you probably have your feelings hurt, but your review says much more about your project than it does MobileGo.
March 07, 2017, 01:51:40 PM
Very interesting project and very helpful community
March 07, 2017, 07:07:44 AM
Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.
After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?
We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.
After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?
We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.
Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.
I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.
About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about
March 06, 2017, 11:48:51 PM
Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.
After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?
We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.
After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?
We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.
Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.
I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.
About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about
March 06, 2017, 04:42:35 PM
MobileGo ICO Sergey Sholom founder of GameCredits interview, answers to questions!
YouTube Video: https://youtu.be/ZHnxb-ZdhGo for Russian-speaking people! ICOTRACKER.NET - https://icotracker.net/project/mobilego
Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.
After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?
We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.
March 06, 2017, 04:26:36 PM
A quick update regarding translations!
So far we have whitepapers for Chinese, German, Portuguese, Russian, Greek, Japanese, English, and French speakers. If you know anyone who might be interested in MobileGo who speaks one of these languages, feel free to direct them to our website: https://mobilego.io/
So far we have whitepapers for Chinese, German, Portuguese, Russian, Greek, Japanese, English, and French speakers. If you know anyone who might be interested in MobileGo who speaks one of these languages, feel free to direct them to our website: https://mobilego.io/
March 06, 2017, 04:17:31 PM
MobileGo ICO Sergey Sholom founder of GameCredits interview, answers to questions!
YouTube Video: https://youtu.be/ZHnxb-ZdhGo for Russian-speaking people! ICOTRACKER.NET - https://icotracker.net/project/mobilego Jump to: