it will become decentralized with time and various tests that the devs have planned what dont you guys understand.. when a baby is born u look after and nurture it u dont let it wonder off. Same with this.. its good that its centralized in the start that way any incoming bugs or viruses can be dealt with swiftly and then once the network has kind of matured and u kno things are looking on the upside then u slowly decentralize and let it become independent in this big dangerous world. I warn you dont start any FUD! ((((((WE ARE AIMING FOR 1000BTC VOLUME)))))
I get that I just wanted to clarify things. If the anon feature has to rely on a single point that is the API server, then it is by definition centralized. Not trying to take away anything from the devs or to fud but let's call things for what they are before people who don't know any better invest based on false information.
No mate it is a wrong view you have here. There is a complete network running subchain and different services! This Api is not the Anon system!! That is important to know!
edit: of course api is part of the complete network.
Bonus question. What will happend if navajo api server went offline ? Will wallet (new wallet, that didnt use anon transaction before) choose NMG by itself (data from main chain or subchains ?) or will it block annon transaction since api server is offline ?
Also, what if the sites' SSL private keys were compromised and all users' sessions were logged?
api does not hold any keys.
edit: We are monitoring every server for any irregular login / change and so on. So if it happens, we bring the service down and start the redundant instance to have time cleaning that mess.
