Author

Topic: [ANN] NiceHash.com - sell & buy hash rate cloud mining service / multipool - page 164. (Read 794394 times)

legendary
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
AxiomHash algorithm added; try out the first ever CPU-based hashing algorithm on NiceHash: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=news&id=20

Can't seem to compile (Ubuntu 14.02...all dependencies are installed).  Anyone else have any hints:


For issues regarding cpuminer please ask the miner's author directly: Epsylon3; https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-cpuminer-multi-v135-linux-windows-vstudiomingw64-gpl-open-source-841401
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
AxiomHash algorithm added; try out the first ever CPU-based hashing algorithm on NiceHash: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=news&id=20

Can't seem to compile (Ubuntu 14.02...all dependencies are installed).  Anyone else have any hints:

make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dhsc19/Downloads/mining/cpuminer-multi'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/dhsc19/Downloads/mining/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/dhsc19/Downloads/mining/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dhsc19/Downloads/mining/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dhsc19/Downloads/mining/cpuminer-multi/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/dhsc19/Downloads/mining/cpuminer-multi'
gcc -std=gnu99 -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-pointer-to-int-cast   -march=native    -o cpuminer cpuminer-cpu-miner.o cpuminer-util.o cpuminer-api.o cpuminer-sysinfos.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_keccak.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_hefty1.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_groestl.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_skein.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_bmw.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_jh.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_shavite.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_blake.o sha3/cpuminer-mod_blakecoin.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_luffa.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_cubehash.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_simd.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_echo.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_hamsi.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_fugue.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_sha2.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_sha2big.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_shabal.o sha3/cpuminer-sph_whirlpool.o crypto/cpuminer-blake2s.o crypto/cpuminer-oaes_lib.o crypto/cpuminer-c_keccak.o crypto/cpuminer-c_groestl.o crypto/cpuminer-c_blake256.o crypto/cpuminer-c_jh.o crypto/cpuminer-c_skein.o crypto/cpuminer-hash.o crypto/cpuminer-aesb.o lyra2/cpuminer-Lyra2.o lyra2/cpuminer-Sponge.o algo/cpuminer-animecoin.o algo/cpuminer-axiom.o algo/cpuminer-blake.o algo/cpuminer-blakecoin.o algo/cpuminer-blake2.o algo/cpuminer-bmw256.o algo/cpuminer-c11.o algo/cpuminer-cryptonight.o algo/cpuminer-drop.o algo/cpuminer-fresh.o algo/cpuminer-groestl.o algo/cpuminer-heavy.o algo/cpuminer-ink.o algo/cpuminer-luffa.o algo/cpuminer-lyra2re.o algo/cpuminer-myr-groestl.o algo/cpuminer-keccak.o algo/cpuminer-pentablake.o algo/cpuminer-quark.o algo/cpuminer-neoscrypt.o algo/cpuminer-nist5.o algo/cpuminer-pluck.o algo/cpuminer-qubit.o algo/cpuminer-scrypt.o algo/cpuminer-sha2.o algo/cpuminer-skein.o algo/cpuminer-skein2.o algo/cpuminer-s3.o algo/cpuminer-x11.o algo/cpuminer-x13.o algo/cpuminer-x14.o algo/cpuminer-x15.o algo/cpuminer-zr5.o asm/cpuminer-neoscrypt_asm.o  asm/cpuminer-sha2-x64.o asm/cpuminer-scrypt-x64.o asm/cpuminer-aesb-x64.o   -ljansson -lpthread
cpuminer-cpu-miner.o: In function `workio_thread':
cpu-miner.c:(.text+0x38a5): undefined reference to `curl_easy_init'
cpu-miner.c:(.text+0x3994): undefined reference to `curl_easy_cleanup'
cpuminer-cpu-miner.o: In function `stratum_gen_work':
cpu-miner.c:(.text+0x3ddf): undefined reference to `SHA256'
cpuminer-cpu-miner.o: In function `longpoll_thread':
cpu-miner.c:(.text+0x5e1a): undefined reference to `curl_easy_init'
cpu-miner.c:(.text+0x63d8): undefined reference to `curl_easy_cleanup'
cpuminer-cpu-miner.o: In function `show_version_and_exit':
cpu-miner.c:(.text+0x6b7c): undefined reference to `curl_version'
cpuminer-cpu-miner.o: In function `main':
cpu-miner.c:(.text+0x8840): undefined reference to `curl_global_init'
cpuminer-util.o: In function `json_rpc_call':
util.c:(.text+0x11e2): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
util.c:(.text+0x120f): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
util.c:(.text+0x1248): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
util.c:(.text+0x1273): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
util.c:(.text+0x129e): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
cpuminer-util.o:util.c:(.text+0x12c9): more undefined references to `curl_easy_setopt' follow
cpuminer-util.o: In function `json_rpc_call':
util.c:(.text+0x169b): undefined reference to `curl_slist_append'
util.c:(.text+0x16bb): undefined reference to `curl_slist_append'
util.c:(.text+0x16d6): undefined reference to `curl_slist_append'
util.c:(.text+0x16f1): undefined reference to `curl_slist_append'
util.c:(.text+0x1725): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
util.c:(.text+0x1734): undefined reference to `curl_easy_perform'
util.c:(.text+0x178d): undefined reference to `curl_easy_getinfo'
util.c:(.text+0x1cb1): undefined reference to `curl_slist_free_all'
util.c:(.text+0x1cc0): undefined reference to `curl_easy_reset'
util.c:(.text+0x1d14): undefined reference to `curl_slist_free_all'
util.c:(.text+0x1d23): undefined reference to `curl_easy_reset'
cpuminer-util.o: In function `stratum_connect':
util.c:(.text+0x317f): undefined reference to `curl_easy_cleanup'
util.c:(.text+0x3184): undefined reference to `curl_easy_init'
util.c:(.text+0x32ed): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
util.c:(.text+0x3312): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
util.c:(.text+0x3334): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
util.c:(.text+0x3356): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
util.c:(.text+0x337b): undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
cpuminer-util.o:util.c:(.text+0x339d): more undefined references to `curl_easy_setopt' follow
cpuminer-util.o: In function `stratum_connect':
util.c:(.text+0x34cf): undefined reference to `curl_easy_perform'
util.c:(.text+0x3503): undefined reference to `curl_easy_cleanup'
cpuminer-util.o: In function `stratum_disconnect':
util.c:(.text+0x3558): undefined reference to `curl_easy_cleanup'
cpuminer-api.o: In function `websocket_handshake':
api.c:(.text+0xa0c): undefined reference to `SHA1_Init'
api.c:(.text+0xa37): undefined reference to `SHA1_Update'
api.c:(.text+0xa50): undefined reference to `SHA1_Final'
algo/cpuminer-heavy.o: In function `heavyhash':
heavy.c:(.text+0x22b): undefined reference to `SHA256_Init'
heavy.c:(.text+0x24d): undefined reference to `SHA256_Update'
heavy.c:(.text+0x26b): undefined reference to `SHA256_Update'
heavy.c:(.text+0x284): undefined reference to `SHA256_Final'
algo/cpuminer-skein.o: In function `skeinhash':
skein.c:(.text+0x159): undefined reference to `SHA256_Init'
skein.c:(.text+0x177): undefined reference to `SHA256_Update'
skein.c:(.text+0x190): undefined reference to `SHA256_Final'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [cpuminer] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dhsc19/Downloads/mining/cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dhsc19/Downloads/mining/cpuminer-multi'
make: *** [all] Error 2
legendary
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
AxiomHash algorithm added; try out the first ever CPU-based hashing algorithm on NiceHash: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=news&id=20
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
Earlier today, the following txid was posted as a miner payment:

http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/33b387cd1cb935b31147544b7e6036190a794745508e802f89ed6eecb7fb6ed1

This TXN is still unconfirmed, 2.5 hours later, despite about 10 blocks being found since. Not sure if the block is too big or too many outputs (251) or what. Blockchain.info says too many outputs.

[EDIT]
Found another (http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/e16bc5fd5360c0e7b40d34d4731304bc3258361cca403d6431d5f15908c53248) that also has 251 outputs. I'm thinking maybe blockchain.info rejected the txn and it will eventually be confirmed by another node, but not sure.

Looks like transaction flooding has started again: https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions

And it seems that not enough fee was applied to this transaction. It will be confirmed eventually (like all transactions have been). All following transactions will of course have higher fees.

the move to a higher fee state is inevitable ...

its actually better for the blockchain also ... the more confirms - the better the security ... or the higher the fee ...

we had a transaction take 3 days to confirm due to the very low fee that was applied to the transaction ... now we have an auto fee applied to every transaction the we make with btc - and all of them go through without any major issue in a reasonably good period of time ...

#crysx
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
Earlier today, the following txid was posted as a miner payment:

http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/33b387cd1cb935b31147544b7e6036190a794745508e802f89ed6eecb7fb6ed1

This TXN is still unconfirmed, 2.5 hours later, despite about 10 blocks being found since. Not sure if the block is too big or too many outputs (251) or what. Blockchain.info says too many outputs.

[EDIT]
Found another (http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/e16bc5fd5360c0e7b40d34d4731304bc3258361cca403d6431d5f15908c53248) that also has 251 outputs. I'm thinking maybe blockchain.info rejected the txn and it will eventually be confirmed by another node, but not sure.

Looks like transaction flooding has started again: https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions

And it seems that not enough fee was applied to this transaction. It will be confirmed eventually (like all transactions have been). All following transactions will of course have higher fees.
full member
Activity: 260
Merit: 100
Earlier today, the following txid was posted as a miner payment:

http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/33b387cd1cb935b31147544b7e6036190a794745508e802f89ed6eecb7fb6ed1

This TXN is still unconfirmed, 2.5 hours later, despite about 10 blocks being found since. Not sure if the block is too big or too many outputs (251) or what. Blockchain.info says too many outputs.

[EDIT]
Found another (http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/e16bc5fd5360c0e7b40d34d4731304bc3258361cca403d6431d5f15908c53248) that also has 251 outputs. I'm thinking maybe blockchain.info rejected the txn and it will eventually be confirmed by another node, but not sure.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
I am buying on westhash and mining at Antpool. 

Does anyone have a better experience mining Antpool with NiceHash instead?

You should leave cloud mining services and mine in a pools if you are interested in mining as it is.
Every cloud mining will surely collapse in a near future, so you will definitely lose your money..

For now I am good.

no one can predict the future - especially in crypto ... so you are pulling at straws by sayinng 'this will happen' and 'that will happen' ...

if crypto history has shown and already proven time and time again - it is rapidly changing and evolving ... so predictions are moot ...

the ONLY thing we are damn sure of is that we NEED to be flexible and adaptable ... which is why i like nicehash ...

they change as the market and the industry changes ... adaptability still with the miner in mind - even though nicehash is not a mining site ...

predict all you want abotu what can or may happen - its all hot air ...

what is now will not be what is tomorrow - but we can rest assured that flexibility will be the deciding factor of success in this industry ...

#crysx
sr. member
Activity: 316
Merit: 250
I am buying on westhash and mining at Antpool. 

Does anyone have a better experience mining Antpool with NiceHash instead?

You should leave cloud mining services and mine in a pools if you are interested in mining as it is.
Every cloud mining will surely collapse in a near future, so you will definitely lose your money..

For now I am good.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Hello,

Is there a way to get notified when certain market conditions are met?

More specifically I would like to notified by either email or SMS text when the Total Speed on either Nice/WestHash X11 meets or exceeds a certain number i.e. 20 Gh/s. Anyway to do this?

Thanks in advance

No, but since you can easily obtain data from NiceHash over publicly available API, it is possible to code a service that would do that. Send me a PM if you are interested to get in contact with someone that can do this quickly for you.
PM sent
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
Hello,

Is there a way to get notified when certain market conditions are met?

More specifically I would like to notified by either email or SMS text when the Total Speed on either Nice/WestHash X11 meets or exceeds a certain number i.e. 20 Gh/s. Anyway to do this?

Thanks in advance

No, but since you can easily obtain data from NiceHash over publicly available API, it is possible to code a service that would do that. Send me a PM if you are interested to get in contact with someone that can do this quickly for you.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Hello,

Is there a way to get notified when certain market conditions are met?

More specifically I would like to notified by either email or SMS text when the Total Speed on either Nice/WestHash X11 meets or exceeds a certain number i.e. 20 Gh/s. Anyway to do this?

Thanks in advance
legendary
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
Hi,

If anyone is interested, there is a 4 BTC AntMiner firmware job posted: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/5-btc-antminer-firmware-job-1134751

Kind regards,
NiceHash
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
I am buying on westhash and mining at Antpool. 

Does anyone have a better experience mining Antpool with NiceHash instead?

You should leave cloud mining services and mine in a pools if you are interested in mining as it is.
Every cloud mining will surely collapse in a near future, so you will definitely lose your money..
sr. member
Activity: 316
Merit: 250
I am buying on westhash and mining at Antpool. 

Does anyone have a better experience mining Antpool with NiceHash instead?
full member
Activity: 142
Merit: 100
Excellent, my bookmark is working perfectly. I am a WestHash connected miner and everything is still mining without any issues. Thank you for verifying Cool
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
Hi,

Question about order refill fee:

According to the FAQs: "You can also refill your existing orders which essentially extends the running time of an order - you can refill your orders as many times as you want and you are not additionally charged for refilling an existing order.

But when you go to the refill order page you see: * Refundable service fee is charged.

When do you see that refund?

Thanks

If you do not spend coins for buying hashing power (if order is not completed, is partly completed or completed with 0%), you get (partial) fee back. You only pay fee for BTC you actually spent buying hashing power. The remaining fee is returned.


How does this affect miners? Do we need to update our miners to point to a new address? If so, what is it?

No changes are needed for miners. You may only have some confusion when viewing your stats - make sure you select correct "Service location" when viewing stats. That is all.

BTW; if you have bookmarked your miners, these bookmarks should work fine (but report back, if they are not). We have redirect in place (redirecting all requests from WestHash to NiceHash).
full member
Activity: 142
Merit: 100
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ALL

About a year ago, we introduced WestHash, a brother service of NiceHash which has stratum proxy located in USA West coast. We did it, so we could offer buyers two source points of renting hashpower and give better coverage to sellers with another hashpower destination point in USA West coast.

We are very aware that everything in crypto scene is very fast and actions need to be taken immediately. We were forced to establish a separate system, which is of course not fully convenient for our customers, especially buyers. There is extra work needed such as being logged in at two sites and monitoring two lists of orders. We did not have proper ideas and solutions, nor the time to implement everything in very short period of time thus we created separate system - WestHash.

But over time, we were monitoring customers requests, adding in new features and laid a good future plan what to do to eventually merge WestHash into NiceHash and offer all customers unique experience. We created Live Marketplace, which visually unites both markets (WestHash and NiceHash) into single real-time updated page.

In following days we are taking final steps of this large venture; WestHash will be fully merged into NiceHash and there will be no need for two logins anymore. Visiting WestHash.com will bring you to NiceHash frontend.

You may have noticed that we have already taken few steps towards this - previously mentioned Live Marketplace, united statistics for miners, united first page statistics table, united Blockchain Lottery and united list of past orders.

Live Marketplace will replace Order list and My order list pages.

Finally, there will be some changes needed to the API. For everyone using the API, you should read following very carefully.

We will try to keep as much backward compatibility as possible. Accessing service through WestHash.com/api will still work in future, but will be obsolete. We recommend that all API users update their software with recommendations mentioned here.

First, we will roll out API version 1.1.0. This version will bring in optional parameter named location to following methods:
  • stats.provider
  • orders.get
  • orders.get&my
  • orders.create
  • orders.refill
  • orders.remove
  • orders.set.price
  • orders.set.price.decrease
  • orders.set.limit

If location parameter is set to 0, it targets NiceHash market, if set to 1, it targets WestHash market. With location as an optional parameter and WestHash.com/api still working, we keep the backward compatibility and at the same time gives you ability to use API only over NiceHash.com/api to manage orders on WestHash market. If optional parameter location is not supplied then NiceHash market is targeted if accessing through NiceHash.com/api and WestHash market is targeted if accessing through WestHash.com/api.

Second API change (version 1.2.0) will make changes to orders.get method. Values rejected_gh, accepted_gh, btc_avail, btc_paid and rejected_speed will be removed from returned output to match the data displayed on Live Marketplace. We decided to remove them because some do not bring any important information (rejected_gh, accepted_gh, rejected_speed) or because of being private and changeable at any time (btc_avail, btc_paid). If your software is using these values, you should modify your software before we update API to 1.2.0.

As always, we request from our customers to report us all the issues to contact mails.

How does this affect miners? Do we need to update our miners to point to a new address? If so, what is it?
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Hi,

Question about order refill fee:

According to the FAQs: "You can also refill your existing orders which essentially extends the running time of an order - you can refill your orders as many times as you want and you are not additionally charged for refilling an existing order.

But when you go to the refill order page you see: * Refundable service fee is charged.

When do you see that refund?

Thanks
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
Just a little question, the "balance is above payment threshold" is btc 0.05?
Jump to: