Author

Topic: [ANN] NiceHash.com - sell & buy hash rate cloud mining service / multipool - page 257. (Read 794394 times)

legendary
Activity: 1237
Merit: 1010
As expected here comes the DDOS. Pool seems to be working tho.
full member
Activity: 215
Merit: 100
All,

Anyone selling SHA-256 with a Cointerra Terraminer IV? I've just pointed mine at NiceHash, and I'm getting 60-80% rejects.  cgminer version is 4.1.0...  so should be supported... I'm specifying -P d=1024 to help with this, but it doesn't seem to make a difference.

I am also running about 45 MH/s worth of Zeusminer Scrypt through Nicehash using cgminer 4.3.5 and it's rock solid, sub-1% rejects.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

Sounds like exactly the problem I mentioned a few posts above ... I was getting about 60% rejects ... can you log in to the unit and see the cgminer output directly?  It's probably running in a screen session just like on the S2 ...

The fix for me was to revert to stock firmware which is running cgminer 3.12 ...

Sorry, I missed this reply. I was under the impression that cgminer versions below 3.7.2 would NOT work with NiceHash? You're suggesting  v3.12 DOES work with NiceHash?

legendary
Activity: 1237
Merit: 1010
Pool is under heavy fire right now. All scrypt miners just dropped connection. Expect hickups.
full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
I looked at twitter before I posted. I must have looked right before they posted that. sorry.
full member
Activity: 307
Merit: 102
on the website

NiceHash @NiceHashMining
Payment for balances >0.001 will be issued at UTC 22:00.
CollapseReplyRetweetFavorite·
full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
anyone else not get paid out today? I had over .005 and I didn't get paid out...
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
This error means that your miner modified ntime too many seconds ahead which means that target pool may refuse such share. Some pools may permit some seconds ahead and some may not, but we don't know which do and which don't so we do not allow ntime to be rolled more than current time (we don't permit rolling into the future). I would suggest you to contact ASIC developer and request a fix on mining software/firmware. Miner should always exhaust extranonce range first, before doing ntime rolling.

Thanks, going back to the latest stock firmware fixed it.  I was running '3rd party' (Kano's - an Antminer dev apparently) firmware when I was experiencing this.  I'm not sure if the problem was the cgminer 4.3.5 in his build, or the driver that's built with that version vs. 3.12 which is in stock, but everything is very happy again with the stock S2 firmware!
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
The latest cgminer (v4.3.5-scrypt.1) seems to do even better than the latest bfgminer (4.3.1 ).

I've got a Blizz X3 and Hurr X6 running on https://github.com/zeusminer/cgminer_zeus (cgminer 3.1.1-zeus) and I'm seeing very acceptable hashrates ((avg):1.322Mh/s / (avg):10.70Mh/s), extremely low rejects (zero in almost an hour now), and no disconnects that I can see from Nicehash ... Wonder if it's worth trying 4.3.5 ... can you define "even better"?

I LOVE bfg and it's dynamic growing queues, but the way it maintains and single chain for all the pools it's connected to, expecting you to only be mining a single coin at a time, doesn't play well with how I've got Nicehash setup as a primary with a price threshold and then multipool.us as a backup when Nicehash isn't hitting my price demands ... I get all sorts of untracked share rejects when using bfg ... might see if I can implement the dynamic queuing in cgminer ... I'm amazed it's not already there, such a great feature ...


Edit: Never mind, found my own answer ... pairing them up with 4.3.5 is yielding more than 1 MH/s more hashrate somehow -

(avg):13.10Mh/s


Edit 2: Looks like dynamic queuing is already in cgminer -

Quote
Version 3.11.0 - 25th January 2014

- Generically increase the queue if we are mining on a pool without local work generation each time we run out of work.
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
Guys, i just wanted to know if nicehash's problems have been solved? I used to come here and see complaint after complaint about how their service doesn't work properly, does the problem still exist or has it been solved?

I've switched back here and they have been stable for a couple days now for me.

+1.

NiceHash is back to #1 on my list of mining pools. I have been back here for the better part of a week now. Getting the best hash rate with my Zeus Miners here. The latest cgminer (v4.3.5-scrypt.1) seems to do even better than the latest bfgminer (4.3.1 ).

Has anyone had experience running Antminers S1s and S3s on NiceHash?
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Guys, i just wanted to know if nicehash's problems have been solved? I used to come here and see complaint after complaint about how their service doesn't work properly, does the problem still exist or has it been solved?

I've switched back here and they have been stable for a couple days now for me.
sr. member
Activity: 457
Merit: 273
Guys, i just wanted to know if nicehash's problems have been solved? I used to come here and see complaint after complaint about how their service doesn't work properly, does the problem still exist or has it been solved?

Of all the pools it still has the highest rejects / disconnects / general hickups for me. Still using it because after subtracting the % downtime B/MH/Day is still best.

Our system is stable and GPU miners that are using current sgminer_V5 (https://www.nicehash.com/software/#sgminer) should't have any issues at all.

General issues with high rejects and disconnects are related mainly to custom software versions of cgminer in various ASIC miners. Unfortunately we don't have access to all ASIC machines and thus can't test them all. If you are a Scrypt ASIC miner and you experience issues, please help us improve compatibility by sending us an email to [email protected] with:

- Scrypt ASIC device details (model, version)
- mining software details (cgminer, bfgminer, version)
- geographical location of your miners with ping report to IP 159.253.132.18 (this is just a network test server)
- details (if possible with logs) about the issues when mining on NiceHash (reject rate, number of disconnects, reports of miner being idle or hangs, etc.)

If you can send us these details to [email protected] (subject: "issues when mining on NiceHash") we will try to resolve issues and improve compatibility.

Thanks for using NiceHash!
legendary
Activity: 1237
Merit: 1010
Guys, i just wanted to know if nicehash's problems have been solved? I used to come here and see complaint after complaint about how their service doesn't work properly, does the problem still exist or has it been solved?

Of all the pools it still has the highest rejects / disconnects / general hickups for me. Still using it because after subtracting the % downtime B/MH/Day is still best.
hero member
Activity: 647
Merit: 501
GainerCoin.com 🔥 Masternode coin 🔥
Guys, i just wanted to know if nicehash's problems have been solved? I used to come here and see complaint after complaint about how their service doesn't work properly, does the problem still exist or has it been solved?

My Rig still idle once every few days. Anybody manage to fix it?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Guys, i just wanted to know if nicehash's problems have been solved? I used to come here and see complaint after complaint about how their service doesn't work properly, does the problem still exist or has it been solved?
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
It's one of many GPU farms out there with 200 or so cards. I'm running one myself, just slightly smaller than that person's. However, it's not considered big anymore.. I used to be in top 5 for most major litecoin pools, those days are long gone! Smiley

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
All,

Anyone selling SHA-256 with a Cointerra Terraminer IV? I've just pointed mine at NiceHash, and I'm getting 60-80% rejects.  cgminer version is 4.1.0...  so should be supported... I'm specifying -P d=1024 to help with this, but it doesn't seem to make a difference.

I am also running about 45 MH/s worth of Zeusminer Scrypt through Nicehash using cgminer 4.3.5 and it's rock solid, sub-1% rejects.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

Sounds like exactly the problem I mentioned a few posts above ... I was getting about 60% rejects ... can you log in to the unit and see the cgminer output directly?  It's probably running in a screen session just like on the S2 ...

The fix for me was to revert to stock firmware which is running cgminer 3.12 ...
Jump to: