Topic: [ANN] NiceHash.com - sell & buy hash rate cloud mining service / multipool - page 326. (Read 794443 times)
May 02, 2014, 09:57:33 AM
Do you get any rejects? Where are you from? Do you submit stale shares? What about if you use other miner - as ATCkit suggested?
May 02, 2014, 09:41:33 AM
Unfortunately, we are constantly being attack with various forms of attacks. Today, someone decided to spam the service with many orders - even though, he had to pay fee for that. Someone is really investing large quantities of resources to try to harm NiceHash.
Which miners are you using that you are getting lower hashrate?
Which miners are you using that you are getting lower hashrate?
Last binaries of cgminer 3.7.2 (from here) and sgminer 4.0.0
May 02, 2014, 09:30:25 AM
Unfortunately, we are constantly being attack with various forms of attacks. Today, someone decided to spam the service with many orders - even though, he had to pay fee for that. Someone is really investing large quantities of resources to try to harm NiceHash.
Which miners are you using that you are getting lower hashrate?
Which miners are you using that you are getting lower hashrate?
May 02, 2014, 07:55:59 AM
BTW, if you are wondering what config i use to get 740 khs on my 280Xs, here it is:
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer -k zuikkis -o stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3333 -u xxxxxxxxx -p p=4.1 x --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8193 -g 2 -I 13 --auto-fan --gpu-fan 30-85 --temp-cutoff 90 --temp-overheat 85 --temp-target 70 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-engine 1052 --gpu-powertune +1 --expiry 1 --scan-time 1 --queue 0 --no-submit-stale
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer -k zuikkis -o stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3333 -u xxxxxxxxx -p p=4.1 x --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8193 -g 2 -I 13 --auto-fan --gpu-fan 30-85 --temp-cutoff 90 --temp-overheat 85 --temp-target 70 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-engine 1052 --gpu-powertune +1 --expiry 1 --scan-time 1 --queue 0 --no-submit-stale
May 02, 2014, 07:46:45 AM
Ya this new version stops working on start up. I have returned to the Apr 15th version of sgminer-4.1.271. It gives my GPUs the best hashrate (740 khs per gpu) i ever had.
My "5 minute accepted speed MH/s" always varies wildly compared to what my miner shows or the list shows.
My concern is this:
The "round accepted speed MH/s" is always way lower than my miner's mhs or what or the list shows for my mining rig. Should it be the same?
Also, what is Round accepted GH? Mine seems good at 18-19 for a 2.2 MHS miner. Is that better than having a "round accepted speed MH/s" of say 0.8? Which variable is the important one?
EDIT: I don't get any rejects using the Apr 15th version of sgminer-4.1.271.
My "5 minute accepted speed MH/s" always varies wildly compared to what my miner shows or the list shows.
My concern is this:
The "round accepted speed MH/s" is always way lower than my miner's mhs or what or the list shows for my mining rig. Should it be the same?
Also, what is Round accepted GH? Mine seems good at 18-19 for a 2.2 MHS miner. Is that better than having a "round accepted speed MH/s" of say 0.8? Which variable is the important one?
EDIT: I don't get any rejects using the Apr 15th version of sgminer-4.1.271.
May 02, 2014, 06:51:06 AM
I'm new to the site, less than 24 hours. I'm using sgminer and mining on the scrypt pool.
One thing that I've noticed is that the accepted MH/s that NiceHash is reporting on my account is about 20% lower than what my miners are reporting.
I love the higher rates that NiceHash pays out, but if I'm being credited 20% less hash than other places, then really I need to consider that I'm only making 80% of the advertised rate.
I've played with my difficulty settings, I've tried both zuikkis kernel and the ckolivas kernel.
Are others experiencing this mysterious loss in hash? Is there something I am doing wrong at my end?
Thanks for any help, suggestions or insight.
Snooker
One thing that I've noticed is that the accepted MH/s that NiceHash is reporting on my account is about 20% lower than what my miners are reporting.
I love the higher rates that NiceHash pays out, but if I'm being credited 20% less hash than other places, then really I need to consider that I'm only making 80% of the advertised rate.
I've played with my difficulty settings, I've tried both zuikkis kernel and the ckolivas kernel.
Are others experiencing this mysterious loss in hash? Is there something I am doing wrong at my end?
Thanks for any help, suggestions or insight.
Snooker
Check you reject percentage. Also make sure you are not just looking at the 5 min hashrate because that may have a huge variance. Look at the "Round accepted speed MH/s" and also look at the chart.
Snooker is right, same thing for me...and I'm looking at the right thing not the 5min avg.
I haven't change my config and I'm getting 600kh/s instead of usual 730kh/s with another pool.
I was able to do 730kh/s before with nicehash, so I'm pretty sure it's not our miners.
May 02, 2014, 06:47:33 AM
Another improvement/ feature request would be the ability to increase the amount of btc on order after creating the order.
May 02, 2014, 03:55:02 AM
I'm new to the site, less than 24 hours. I'm using sgminer and mining on the scrypt pool.
One thing that I've noticed is that the accepted MH/s that NiceHash is reporting on my account is about 20% lower than what my miners are reporting.
I love the higher rates that NiceHash pays out, but if I'm being credited 20% less hash than other places, then really I need to consider that I'm only making 80% of the advertised rate.
I've played with my difficulty settings, I've tried both zuikkis kernel and the ckolivas kernel.
Are others experiencing this mysterious loss in hash? Is there something I am doing wrong at my end?
Thanks for any help, suggestions or insight.
Snooker
One thing that I've noticed is that the accepted MH/s that NiceHash is reporting on my account is about 20% lower than what my miners are reporting.
I love the higher rates that NiceHash pays out, but if I'm being credited 20% less hash than other places, then really I need to consider that I'm only making 80% of the advertised rate.
I've played with my difficulty settings, I've tried both zuikkis kernel and the ckolivas kernel.
Are others experiencing this mysterious loss in hash? Is there something I am doing wrong at my end?
Thanks for any help, suggestions or insight.
Snooker
Check you reject percentage. Also make sure you are not just looking at the 5 min hashrate because that may have a huge variance. Look at the "Round accepted speed MH/s" and also look at the chart.
May 02, 2014, 02:21:30 AM
I'm new to the site, less than 24 hours. I'm using sgminer and mining on the scrypt pool.
One thing that I've noticed is that the accepted MH/s that NiceHash is reporting on my account is about 20% lower than what my miners are reporting.
I love the higher rates that NiceHash pays out, but if I'm being credited 20% less hash than other places, then really I need to consider that I'm only making 80% of the advertised rate.
I've played with my difficulty settings, I've tried both zuikkis kernel and the ckolivas kernel.
Are others experiencing this mysterious loss in hash? Is there something I am doing wrong at my end?
Thanks for any help, suggestions or insight.
Snooker
One thing that I've noticed is that the accepted MH/s that NiceHash is reporting on my account is about 20% lower than what my miners are reporting.
I love the higher rates that NiceHash pays out, but if I'm being credited 20% less hash than other places, then really I need to consider that I'm only making 80% of the advertised rate.
I've played with my difficulty settings, I've tried both zuikkis kernel and the ckolivas kernel.
Are others experiencing this mysterious loss in hash? Is there something I am doing wrong at my end?
Thanks for any help, suggestions or insight.
Snooker
May 02, 2014, 01:12:15 AM
Can i use my simple old CGminer with this service?
No you can't.
You need only a mining software which is patched to the extranonce2 bug.
The last sgminer github version is ready, or the modded cgminer 3.7.2 release by nicehashdev is ready too.
Or if you have a specific version of cgminer, you can patch it, with this patch :
https://github.com/bitbandi/sgminer/commit/7521451cae3ffadecd007b12d1a3fe0f44e80a9a
May 02, 2014, 12:02:16 AM
I decided to try Lightning Asics firmware, and it works well at every other pool I've tried. However, I get 100% rejects here. It is CPUminer based. Log says:
DEBUG: reject reason: Invalid extranonce2 size.
DEBUG: reject reason: Invalid extranonce2 size.
Yes you need a miner that fix the extranonce issue, as per FAQ : supported miner listed on the website. (Tho some others work, most of the times anyways. EG Cuda miner)
May 01, 2014, 07:30:39 PM
I decided to try Lightning Asics firmware, and it works well at every other pool I've tried. However, I get 100% rejects here. It is CPUminer based. Log says:
DEBUG: reject reason: Invalid extranonce2 size.
DEBUG: reject reason: Invalid extranonce2 size.
May 01, 2014, 06:50:57 PM
cgminer binaries seems to work fine on windows now, but I'm getting a lower hashrate than before with the same config...575 instead of 730kh/s.
anybody have a clue why?
anybody have a clue why?
May 01, 2014, 03:43:24 PM
Can i use my simple old CGminer with this service?
May 01, 2014, 07:17:50 AM
this bug is corrected on cgminer 4.x but scrypt support was remove since 3.7.2 version 
so i don't know how to solve the bug
[Edit] All is right now.
Any reject since 4 hours
very good job nicehashdev
so i don't know how to solve the bug
[Edit] All is right now.
Any reject since 4 hours
very good job nicehashdev
May 01, 2014, 05:35:46 AM
New betatest packages for sgminer/cgminer with fixed idlebug and added extranonce subscription for better performance when working on NiceHash.
Source sgminer:
git clone -b idlebug https://github.com/bitbandi/sgminer
Binaries sgminer:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bk63p5ucyhpid2t/aWhA2KsVZx/sgminer-idlebug
Source modded cgminer 3.7.2:
git clone -b cgminer-master https://github.com/bitbandi/sgminer
Binaries modded cgminer 3.7.2:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bk63p5ucyhpid2t/XEH3qIVFaZ/cgminer-kalroth
Please test them and report back any bugs.
Is your cgminer 3.7.2 modded remove the bug of 100% reject with the message "rejected share above target" ??Source sgminer:
git clone -b idlebug https://github.com/bitbandi/sgminer
Binaries sgminer:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bk63p5ucyhpid2t/aWhA2KsVZx/sgminer-idlebug
Source modded cgminer 3.7.2:
git clone -b cgminer-master https://github.com/bitbandi/sgminer
Binaries modded cgminer 3.7.2:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bk63p5ucyhpid2t/XEH3qIVFaZ/cgminer-kalroth
Please test them and report back any bugs.
Because when I try the official cgminer 3.7.2 on your pool, I have this bug.
Thank you very much to your help.
Same here, 100% rejects when mining here...these cgminer binaries are no good.
May 01, 2014, 02:21:51 AM
Hey guys, I'm experiencing some price drops abruptly today and yesterday on SHA256.
Is this right ?
Thanks
Is this right ?
Thanks
If the better paying order goes dead, then your miners are switched to lower paying orders for a while.
Hi,
I have some problem with the pool and bfgminer.
I use the last git version of bfgminer (3.99.0) and i have lots reject with this error: Share above target.
I know that's a bug in cgminer 3.7.2 but is it normal that's the last bfgminer had the same error ?
thanks to your help.
I have some problem with the pool and bfgminer.
I use the last git version of bfgminer (3.99.0) and i have lots reject with this error: Share above target.
I know that's a bug in cgminer 3.7.2 but is it normal that's the last bfgminer had the same error ?
thanks to your help.
Do you get 100% rejects or only some rejects?
I have near 40% of rejects.
I use this bfgminer with gridseed g-Blade
New betatest packages for sgminer/cgminer with fixed idlebug and added extranonce subscription for better performance when working on NiceHash.
Source sgminer:
git clone -b idlebug https://github.com/bitbandi/sgminer
Binaries sgminer:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bk63p5ucyhpid2t/aWhA2KsVZx/sgminer-idlebug
Source modded cgminer 3.7.2:
git clone -b cgminer-master https://github.com/bitbandi/sgminer
Binaries modded cgminer 3.7.2:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bk63p5ucyhpid2t/XEH3qIVFaZ/cgminer-kalroth
Please test them and report back any bugs.
Is your cgminer 3.7.2 modded remove the bug of 100% reject with the message "rejected share above target" ??Source sgminer:
git clone -b idlebug https://github.com/bitbandi/sgminer
Binaries sgminer:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bk63p5ucyhpid2t/aWhA2KsVZx/sgminer-idlebug
Source modded cgminer 3.7.2:
git clone -b cgminer-master https://github.com/bitbandi/sgminer
Binaries modded cgminer 3.7.2:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bk63p5ucyhpid2t/XEH3qIVFaZ/cgminer-kalroth
Please test them and report back any bugs.
Because when I try the official cgminer 3.7.2 on your pool, I have this bug.
Thank you very much to your help.
May 01, 2014, 01:24:16 AM
I'm also getting "stratum_recv_line failed" on my cudaminer on scrypt port 3333
April 30, 2014, 09:48:31 PM
Both 3333 and 3335 are dead. Ports respond to telnet but I don't speak stratum so don't know what exactly is failing. Any ETA?
April 30, 2014, 09:43:59 PM
Hmmmm...just noticed my miner has been mining my backup for the last two hours. What's odd is that Nicehash is reporting that my hashrate has been stuck on a non-zero steady value (like a flat line, not the normal fluctuations), but no valid shares.
I'm using the sgminer 4.1.271-17-ge7bc (compiled from April 28 notice).
I'm using the sgminer 4.1.271-17-ge7bc (compiled from April 28 notice).
Jump to: