Topic: [ANN] 📁 novusphere.io 📁 atmos (ATMS) 📁 Censorship Resistant Media Sharing 📁 - page 55. (Read 120206 times)

I'm not wrong, but you got me wrong. In your sentence above:
 "1 vidz gets you 1/2 of a atmos" - that is correct.
 "you buy vidz at 260 sat, you get atmos for 130 sats" - that is the opposite of correct. You buy VIDZ at 260 sat, you get atmos for 520 sat.

Anyway, IceFrag pretty much nailed it (just small cirrection: vidz weight in second round is 1.25x, not 1x).

you are WRONG!

with trading fees im pretty spot on.

Burned (Round 2)   2619.99
Estimated Receive (Round 1)   0.00 atmos
Estimated Receive (Round 2)   0.00 atmos
Estimated Receive (from VIDZ)   1436.69 atmos

Nope. You got it completely reversed.

1 vidz gets you 1/2 of a atmos
you buy vidz at 260 sat, you get atmos for 130 sats

Things got pretty dead after phase 1

Don't get too excited, IPFS is based on TCP/IP, so it is not going to replace it. We have to bear with good old TCP/IP even when IPFS takes the world 
As for the rest, that's correct, and thats good design.

@asphyxia: may I ask who are those uploaders, which moved from Vidz to Novus? Are they from this forum, or from elsewhere?

Also something you should know about IPFS and how its deduplication work. If you upload the same file and the file already exists (lets say the smurfs) The Hash (key) Will be exactly the same. You can test it by uploading the same movie twice you will get the same exact hash. Yes IPFS is the future it replaces TCP/IP which is Internet 1.0. IPFS is Internet 2.0

Thanks for responding and addressing the hash. Thank you very much for your answer. Supporters hosting & moving with you is all I had hear .

I have to agree that IPFS is the future. Theres been talk of IPFS in other media circles (cough cough). Anyways your answer on the hash works for me :p
PM'ing you about schtuff :p

An IPFS hash is produced when a file is added to a node. This hash is produced based off the content in the file, think similar to how a sha256 hash may be produced for an array of bytes. Same file, same hash. I reached out to some of the uploaders that had helped support Pure Vidz in the past and let them know about Novus. It should come as no surprise that I have their contact information as I've reached out to them prior in the past when Pure Vidz migrated from Web Torrents to IPFS. It's not that the same index is being used, but rather some of the same files. It's easy enough to bootstrap a couple IPFS nodes together so they're easily made aware of each others files as well as make your node bootstrappable so other nodes can pass content through it.

Thanks.

When second round end?

Posts throughout the thread are deleted all the time. Who deletes them none of us know. Like you said PV does not show logged in or last active for a long long time. Posts have been deleted and thats all I know.

As for this being 100% of anything, its not. But the keys are the same. So the content and ipfs index is the same. I have simply pointed out that 1 day after my initial post the domain goes down..

Please keep in mind that I only am pointing out that the IPFS keys for the content is exact same for content on both sites. Except purevidz no longer works but novus does. A generic download of the purvidz.net can be downloaded at http://www.trollpay.com/purevidz.net.zip  in the home/watch folder is where the movie pages from purevidz.net are. you can open any of them look for IPFS_HASH = and  find the exact same movie at novus and you will see they use the exact same keys.

Again this just says there using same IPFS. you all decide whatever else it means.

I sent it to 1 person that I seen was active. As I did not want to become involved but give enough so that people could research what I had provided and come to there own conclusion. People run around speculating when gathering good/bad evidence is just as easy. I only found this out because I had indexed the entire purevidz movie collection and seen the exact same keys while comparing vidz scub to novus.

Until this dev explains how he is using the same index as a network he no longer has any connection or access to I just say be cautious. If dev answers with legit reasoning IPFS is the way to go for fast indexing and instant streaming of 0 day movies. A little scarey to do when you still have a small ipfs network (unless your indexing right on the public) But still if dev can give legit reasoning thats the only issue I see with any of it.

As far as I remember, those files were not hosted by Vidz servers, but rather just indexed. The files themselves were supposed to be posted by random people, and be 'seeded' from their PC's (as well as from any downloader's PC if I get it right).

So what is so strange in Novus having the same IPFS hashes as Vidz had? I am genuinely interested, as according to my [rather superficial] understanding of IPFS, there is nothing wrong with this.

Again this just says there using same IPFS. you all decide whatever else it means.