Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] NSF Miner - ethereum miner without fee [AMD+Nvidia/Windows+Linux] - page 3. (Read 2055 times)

newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
can you add cuda 9.2 or cuda 10?version cuda 11.2 give me 14mh on gtx1070.other miners 27-28mh.ethminer0.19 26.5mh
hero member
Activity: 764
Merit: 500
I’ll give it a try and send feedback. But can you add more options like temp/fan/clk/mem voltage/... control to it? It would be very nice.
Something like zombiemode would be great too.

yes these features are announced in future updates
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
I’ll give it a try and send feedback. But can you add more options like temp/fan/clk/mem voltage/... control to it? It would be very nice.
Something like zombiemode would be great too.
jr. member
Activity: 57
Merit: 3
How can I see the average pool value in nfsminer for binance pool? Like other miners...
I couldn't find it under the --help section.

If not, I have a request for the next version. Grin Grin Grin

nfsminer works stably for me.
1x 6800 sapphire
1x 6800 xt msi
1x 6900 xt xfx
hero member
Activity: 764
Merit: 500
I having problem compiling on Ubuntu 20.04. I managed to work though a couple of issues
but never got it to compile.

see the solution to your problem here: https://github.com/no-fee-ethereum-mining/nsfminer/issues?page=1&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed

That's just a list of closed issues. Which one is it and if it's closed why does it still fail to compile?
there is no answer to your question among closed topics?
hero member
Activity: 764
Merit: 500
Excuse my ignorance... But nothing is free... What is the catch to using this software?
I think that nothing, the project does not take much time, in addition to this there are other projects that generate income
full member
Activity: 1424
Merit: 225
I having problem compiling on Ubuntu 20.04. I managed to work though a couple of issues
but never got it to compile.

see the solution to your problem here: https://github.com/no-fee-ethereum-mining/nsfminer/issues?page=1&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed

That's just a list of closed issues. Which one is it and if it's closed why does it still fail to compile?
hero member
Activity: 764
Merit: 500
I having problem compiling on Ubuntu 20.04. I managed to work though a couple of issues
but never got it to compile.

First I have to clone the repo. The release source tarball doesn't have the git config files
so git submodule update fails.

The default in Ubuntu 20.04 is GCC-9. I needed to install GCC-8 and configure cmake to use it:

cmake .. -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc-8

Then this error during make:

Code:
[ 54%] Linking CXX static library libhwmon.a
[ 54%] Built target hwmon
[ 57%] Building NVCC (Device) object libcuda/CMakeFiles/cuda.dir/cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o
nvcc fatal   : Value 'c++17' is not defined for option 'std'
CMake Error at cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o.Release.cmake:220 (message):
  Error generating
  /home/bob/miners/nsf/nsfminer/build/libcuda/CMakeFiles/cuda.dir//./cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o


make[2]: *** [libcuda/CMakeFiles/cuda.dir/build.make:65: libcuda/CMakeFiles/cuda.dir/cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:462: libcuda/CMakeFiles/cuda.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
[ 60%] Linking CXX static library libpool.a
[ 60%] Built target pool
make: *** [Makefile:152: all] Error 2

I then editted 2 config files to change all references of c++17 to c++14. It got further but still failed with many undefined references:

Code:
[100%] Linking CXX executable nsfminer
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/nsfminer.dir/main.cpp.o: in function `dev::eth::TelemetryType::strvec(std::__cxx11::list, std::allocator >, std::allocator, std::allocator > > >&)':
main.cpp:(.text._ZN3dev3eth13TelemetryType6strvecERNSt7__cxx114listINS2_12basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS8_EEE[_ZN3dev3eth13TelemetryType6strvecERNSt7__cxx114listINS2_12basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS8_EEE]+0x47): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream, std::allocator >::basic_stringstream()'
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/nsfminer.dir/main.cpp.o: in function `headers(std::vector, std::allocator >, std::allocator, std::allocator > > >&, bool) [clone .constprop.0]':
main.cpp:(.text._ZL7headersRSt6vectorINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS5_EEb.constprop.0+0x94): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream, std::allocator >::basic_stringstream()'
/usr/bin/ld: ../libeth/libeth.a(Farm.cpp.o): in function `dev::eth::Farm::Farm(std::map, std::allocator >, dev::eth::DeviceDescriptor, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, dev::eth::DeviceDescriptor> > >&, dev::eth::FarmSettings)':
Farm.cpp:(.text._ZN3dev3eth4FarmC2ERSt3mapINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEENS0_16DeviceDescriptorESt4lessIS8_ESaISt4pairIKS8_S9_EEENS0_12FarmSettingsE+0x7c6): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >::basic_ostringstream()'
/usr/bin/ld: Farm.cpp:(.text._ZN3dev3eth4FarmC2ERSt3mapINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEENS0_16DeviceDescriptorESt4lessIS8_ESaISt4pairIKS8_S9_EEENS0_12FarmSettingsE+0xb64): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >::basic_ostringstream()'
/usr/bin/ld: ../libpool/libpool.a(PoolManager.cpp.o): in function `dev::eth::PoolManager::setClientHandlers()::{lambda(std::chrono::duration > const&, unsigned int const&)#5}::operator()(std::chrono::duration > const&, unsigned int const&) const [clone .isra.0]':
PoolManager.cpp:(.text._ZZN3dev3eth11PoolManager17setClientHandlersEvENKUlRKNSt6chrono8durationIlSt5ratioILl1ELl1000EEEERKjE3_clES8_SA_.isra.0+0x3b): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream, std::allocator >::basic_stringstream()'



see the solution to your problem here: https://github.com/no-fee-ethereum-mining/nsfminer/issues?page=1&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed
jr. member
Activity: 152
Merit: 3
Do you have any suggestions for what new to add to the miner?

Some information about the GPU (temperature, fan speed, power draw...) would be nice.

hello,

My résult: 2 rig same config | 1 T-REX - 1 NSF

Code:
ETHminer: 320 share 1h10 |362Mhs
T-Rex: 330 shares 1H10 | 366 Mhs
ETHminer NFS: 350 share 1h10 |362Mhs


t-rex v.0.19.11 A 345 1H15
ethminer-NFS A 360 1H15

------------

t-rex v.0.19.11 A 315 1H15
ethminer-NFS A 350 1H15

------------

t-rex v.0.19.11 A 627 2H15
=26.31$ | 0.01671 ETH

ethminer-NFS A 624 2H15
=38.07$ | 0.0243 ETH

------------

I try with 1  ASUS TUF 3070:

NFS - 60.88MHS
T-rex - 61.70MHS

But T-rex 1% Fee => 60.88 + 1% = 61.48Mhs

So between the software with fee and NFS it is for me the same or even sometimes more efficient.
Because with Gminer, Trex or Phoenix the hashrate is increased but it is to pay their Fee in reality ...

I use it I have 19 Nvidia 3060Ti and 3070 cards.
We have a few badshare from time to time, do you do a CPU checks like the others in order to avoid badshare?

Then, possible to add DAG sequential initialization and the way it builds in order to avoid corrupted and bad-share DAGs, I have a RIG of 10 cards and its load the dag of 10 cards in 1 time.

Otherwise good work.
thanks for the info, this is useful data

any idea for the DAG options? initialization and avoid badshares.
full member
Activity: 1424
Merit: 225
I having problem compiling on Ubuntu 20.04. I managed to work though a couple of issues
but never got it to compile.

First I have to clone the repo. The release source tarball doesn't have the git config files
so git submodule update fails.

The default in Ubuntu 20.04 is GCC-9. I needed to install GCC-8 and configure cmake to use it:

cmake .. -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc-8

Then this error during make:

Code:
[ 54%] Linking CXX static library libhwmon.a
[ 54%] Built target hwmon
[ 57%] Building NVCC (Device) object libcuda/CMakeFiles/cuda.dir/cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o
nvcc fatal   : Value 'c++17' is not defined for option 'std'
CMake Error at cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o.Release.cmake:220 (message):
  Error generating
  /home/bob/miners/nsf/nsfminer/build/libcuda/CMakeFiles/cuda.dir//./cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o


make[2]: *** [libcuda/CMakeFiles/cuda.dir/build.make:65: libcuda/CMakeFiles/cuda.dir/cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:462: libcuda/CMakeFiles/cuda.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
[ 60%] Linking CXX static library libpool.a
[ 60%] Built target pool
make: *** [Makefile:152: all] Error 2

I then editted 2 config files to change all references of c++17 to c++14. It got further but still failed with many undefined references:

Code:
[100%] Linking CXX executable nsfminer
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/nsfminer.dir/main.cpp.o: in function `dev::eth::TelemetryType::strvec(std::__cxx11::list, std::allocator >, std::allocator, std::allocator > > >&)':
main.cpp:(.text._ZN3dev3eth13TelemetryType6strvecERNSt7__cxx114listINS2_12basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS8_EEE[_ZN3dev3eth13TelemetryType6strvecERNSt7__cxx114listINS2_12basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS8_EEE]+0x47): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream, std::allocator >::basic_stringstream()'
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/nsfminer.dir/main.cpp.o: in function `headers(std::vector, std::allocator >, std::allocator, std::allocator > > >&, bool) [clone .constprop.0]':
main.cpp:(.text._ZL7headersRSt6vectorINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEESaIS5_EEb.constprop.0+0x94): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream, std::allocator >::basic_stringstream()'
/usr/bin/ld: ../libeth/libeth.a(Farm.cpp.o): in function `dev::eth::Farm::Farm(std::map, std::allocator >, dev::eth::DeviceDescriptor, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, dev::eth::DeviceDescriptor> > >&, dev::eth::FarmSettings)':
Farm.cpp:(.text._ZN3dev3eth4FarmC2ERSt3mapINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEENS0_16DeviceDescriptorESt4lessIS8_ESaISt4pairIKS8_S9_EEENS0_12FarmSettingsE+0x7c6): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >::basic_ostringstream()'
/usr/bin/ld: Farm.cpp:(.text._ZN3dev3eth4FarmC2ERSt3mapINSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEENS0_16DeviceDescriptorESt4lessIS8_ESaISt4pairIKS8_S9_EEENS0_12FarmSettingsE+0xb64): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >::basic_ostringstream()'
/usr/bin/ld: ../libpool/libpool.a(PoolManager.cpp.o): in function `dev::eth::PoolManager::setClientHandlers()::{lambda(std::chrono::duration > const&, unsigned int const&)#5}::operator()(std::chrono::duration > const&, unsigned int const&) const [clone .isra.0]':
PoolManager.cpp:(.text._ZZN3dev3eth11PoolManager17setClientHandlersEvENKUlRKNSt6chrono8durationIlSt5ratioILl1ELl1000EEEERKjE3_clES8_SA_.isra.0+0x3b): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_stringstream, std::allocator >::basic_stringstream()'


full member
Activity: 1179
Merit: 131
Excuse my ignorance... But nothing is free... What is the catch to using this software?

There is plenty of free mining software out there.  Hell plenty of free software in general.  There isn't always a catch.  2 free projects off the top of my head:  ccminer and cpuminer-opt
full member
Activity: 1179
Merit: 131
Ok I just gave this a spin, thanks for the work on this by the way.  Tested on 1.38 (Windows)

I have a 1660 Super and a 5600xt.  When I launch the miner it says no opencl devices found.  It does find my nvidia card however.
On Phoenix miner I get 30.215 MH/S.  On NSFMiner I get 29.97, so its comparable.  I didn't test the power output or anything like that.

I would recommend putting some example bat files in with the release archives.  Most people are too lazy or confused to read the documentation and create on themselves  Grin
pretty good results, given that the miner has no commission, as compared to the phoenix

Any idea why it wouldn't recognize the AMD card?
hero member
Activity: 764
Merit: 500
Do you have any suggestions for what new to add to the miner?

Some information about the GPU (temperature, fan speed, power draw...) would be nice.

hello,

My résult: 2 rig same config | 1 T-REX - 1 NSF

Code:
ETHminer: 320 share 1h10 |362Mhs
T-Rex: 330 shares 1H10 | 366 Mhs
ETHminer NFS: 350 share 1h10 |362Mhs


t-rex v.0.19.11 A 345 1H15
ethminer-NFS A 360 1H15

------------

t-rex v.0.19.11 A 315 1H15
ethminer-NFS A 350 1H15

------------

t-rex v.0.19.11 A 627 2H15
=26.31$ | 0.01671 ETH

ethminer-NFS A 624 2H15
=38.07$ | 0.0243 ETH

------------

I try with 1  ASUS TUF 3070:

NFS - 60.88MHS
T-rex - 61.70MHS

But T-rex 1% Fee => 60.88 + 1% = 61.48Mhs

So between the software with fee and NFS it is for me the same or even sometimes more efficient.
Because with Gminer, Trex or Phoenix the hashrate is increased but it is to pay their Fee in reality ...

I use it I have 19 Nvidia 3060Ti and 3070 cards.
We have a few badshare from time to time, do you do a CPU checks like the others in order to avoid badshare?

Then, possible to add DAG sequential initialization and the way it builds in order to avoid corrupted and bad-share DAGs, I have a RIG of 10 cards and its load the dag of 10 cards in 1 time.

Otherwise good work.
thanks for the info, this is useful data
jr. member
Activity: 152
Merit: 3
Do you have any suggestions for what new to add to the miner?

Some information about the GPU (temperature, fan speed, power draw...) would be nice.

hello,

My résult: 2 rig same config | 1 T-REX - 1 NSF

Code:
ETHminer: 320 share 1h10 |362Mhs
T-Rex: 330 shares 1H10 | 366 Mhs
ETHminer NFS: 350 share 1h10 |362Mhs


t-rex v.0.19.11 A 345 1H15
ethminer-NFS A 360 1H15

------------

t-rex v.0.19.11 A 315 1H15
ethminer-NFS A 350 1H15

------------

t-rex v.0.19.11 A 627 2H15
=26.31$ | 0.01671 ETH

ethminer-NFS A 624 2H15
=38.07$ | 0.0243 ETH

------------

I try with 1  ASUS TUF 3070:

NFS - 60.88MHS
T-rex - 61.70MHS

But T-rex 1% Fee => 60.88 + 1% = 61.48Mhs

So between the software with fee and NFS it is for me the same or even sometimes more efficient.
Because with Gminer, Trex or Phoenix the hashrate is increased but it is to pay their Fee in reality ...

I use it I have 19 Nvidia 3060Ti and 3070 cards.
We have a few badshare from time to time, do you do a CPU checks like the others in order to avoid badshare?

Then, possible to add DAG sequential initialization and the way it builds in order to avoid corrupted and bad-share DAGs, I have a RIG of 10 cards and its load the dag of 10 cards in 1 time.

Otherwise good work.
hero member
Activity: 764
Merit: 500
Ok I just gave this a spin, thanks for the work on this by the way.  Tested on 1.38 (Windows)

I have a 1660 Super and a 5600xt.  When I launch the miner it says no opencl devices found.  It does find my nvidia card however.
On Phoenix miner I get 30.215 MH/S.  On NSFMiner I get 29.97, so its comparable.  I didn't test the power output or anything like that.

I would recommend putting some example bat files in with the release archives.  Most people are too lazy or confused to read the documentation and create on themselves  Grin
pretty good results, given that the miner has no commission, as compared to the phoenix
full member
Activity: 1179
Merit: 131
Ok I just gave this a spin, thanks for the work on this by the way.  Tested on 1.38 (Windows)

I have a 1660 Super and a 5600xt.  When I launch the miner it says no opencl devices found.  It does find my nvidia card however.
On Phoenix miner I get 30.215 MH/S.  On NSFMiner I get 29.97, so its comparable.  I didn't test the power output or anything like that.

I would recommend putting some example bat files in with the release archives.  Most people are too lazy or confused to read the documentation and create on themselves  Grin
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
Win 64 Pro 240 GB SSD 32 GB Virtual memory

I-3 6100 8Gb Ram
Asus Pro Carbon Z170 MB

1 Rx470 8gb Nitro
3 RX570 4 GB Sapphire
everything on Risers

AMd driver : 20.1.2

hero member
Activity: 764
Merit: 500
1.37 doesn't work
1.34 ........ does

What I have to do in order to have
1.38 to work ?
 
write the system on which you run the miner
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
1.37 doesn't work
1.34 ........ does

What I have to do in order to have
1.38 to work ?
 
jr. member
Activity: 66
Merit: 4
Figure out how to "fool" these new RTX cards to mine full speed and you will have instant client base lol
Pages:
Jump to: