Smells fishy to me, unless dev can explain this:
1)Dev posted a picture of his online pharmacy website, yet he has a competitor's (Walgreen's) ad in the lower right, LOL!
2)While I fully trust Earlz, I feel that something is hiding from him in the coin code or official pool code. These guys just
DON'T have half of the LTC mining power. Do you know how many farms that would be and how much it would cost?
See here:
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/litecoin/difficultyHey, prove me wrong, because I sure would be interested in the impossible mathematics behind PHARM getting half of
LTC's nethash, yet LTC diff isn't going down much and NiceHash and MRR isn't being used at all.
Or wild conspiracy theory is that they are an asic manufacturing company testing out their new SFARDS chips, but I doubt
a real serious company would make an obvious fake coin to test it on.
1) The Walgreens logo seems over the top. Crosses the line from proving legitimacy and straight into too ridiculous to believe territory. Granted it's a mock-up but come on, why even put that on there? Walgreens wants nothing to do with a shady crypto pollack operation and you'd have to be retarded to believe so.
2) Wouldn't doubt there are mountains of scrypt ASICs somewhere collecting dust, they were overproduced and fell into unprofitably quickly. I guess it's possible a large datacenter is sitting on a mountain of ASICs purchased on wholesale that they can't profitably run with current LTC prices + electricity costs, and they figure they are better off waiting for the next LTC price spike to flip them all on again and start dumping coins to recoup their investment. Maybe XPH devs hit them up to put those old ASICs to use? Of course, I am making a lot of far fetched assumptions to make this sound plausible.
I don't know, but XPH devs should use their primary assets better and be smarter about promotion if they want their coin to succeed. Example:
