Anyone with link to wp no link on the first page
From OP:
"Future features will include uncle mining (using the DECOR+ protocol) and a pending whitepaper regarding a Blocktree protocol which is aimed at solving on-chain scalability."
Topic: [ANN] [POW] [MSR] Masari - simple, scalable, and secure cryptocurrency - page 28. (Read 85412 times)
June 08, 2018, 06:39:46 PM
From OP:
"Future features will include uncle mining (using the DECOR+ protocol) and a pending whitepaper regarding a Blocktree protocol which is aimed at solving on-chain scalability."
June 08, 2018, 01:16:57 PM
Anyone with link to wp no link on the first page
June 08, 2018, 12:31:44 PM
Good topic, i read it all. Let's buy some Mazari!!
You read it all after registering 2 minutes ago
You don't need to be registered to read topics, dohh.
June 08, 2018, 08:56:17 AM
Good topic, i read it all. Let's buy some Mazari!!
You read it all after registering 2 minutes ago
June 08, 2018, 08:48:07 AM
Good topic, i read it all. Let's buy some Mazari!!
June 07, 2018, 02:35:16 PM
The PoW change seems a good choice, there are too many coins with the same algorithm.. it's a security problem
June 07, 2018, 07:33:47 AM
Masari has developed CN-Fast and will roll it out as the PoW algo @ block height 204,000. Testing shows a hashrate increase of 30-50% for both CPU & GPU against CNv7.
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
What is the problem of CNv7? If you want larger hashrate number, why don't choose SHA256 as POW algorithm same as Bitcoin?
What lmao? Your comment makes no sense. The hash increase is all relative. We're forking to prevent 51% attacks and timestamp manipulation. Our network is relatively small in comparison to XMR or ETN. People have been attacking MSR with large nicehash orders (CN7 orders). This fork will move us away from CN7 and kick nicehashers out.
Excellent move. We will see a much more stable network post fork.
So, the reason from CNv7 to CNfast is to kick nicehashers out by using a less common POW algorithm?
It's the same reason XTL is also forking away from nicehash. Nicehash is pure cancer thanks to a few toxic A-holes with large sums of BTC who use the massive hashrate to attack smaller projects. It's the same reason more projects are moving to CN-Heavy aswell.
I mean look at all the 51% attacks that have been happening recently. Bitcoin Gold, Litecoin Cash, Verge, ZenCash ect.. Where do you think those tards got the massive multi algorithm (SHA-256, Equihash, Blake2s, Lyra2c2..) hashrate from? Yup, nicehash.
Nicehash is pure aids, I'm glad we're making this move. It was awesome when they got hacked, pitty they didn't close down for good.
It's not necessary Nicehash fault, it could also be big pool owners, the problem is that more coins are using the same algo and the attack is pretty easy to do. Way to go Masari for changing the algo !
June 07, 2018, 03:52:48 AM
Masari has developed CN-Fast and will roll it out as the PoW algo @ block height 204,000. Testing shows a hashrate increase of 30-50% for both CPU & GPU against CNv7.
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
What is the problem of CNv7? If you want larger hashrate number, why don't choose SHA256 as POW algorithm same as Bitcoin?
What lmao? Your comment makes no sense. The hash increase is all relative. We're forking to prevent 51% attacks and timestamp manipulation. Our network is relatively small in comparison to XMR or ETN. People have been attacking MSR with large nicehash orders (CN7 orders). This fork will move us away from CN7 and kick nicehashers out.
Excellent move. We will see a much more stable network post fork.
So, the reason from CNv7 to CNfast is to kick nicehashers out by using a less common POW algorithm?
It's the same reason XTL is also forking away from nicehash. Nicehash is pure cancer thanks to a few toxic A-holes with large sums of BTC who use the massive hashrate to attack smaller projects. It's the same reason more projects are moving to CN-Heavy aswell.
I mean look at all the 51% attacks that have been happening recently. Bitcoin Gold, Litecoin Cash, Verge, ZenCash ect.. Where do you think those tards got the massive multi algorithm (SHA-256, Equihash, Blake2s, Lyra2c2..) hashrate from? Yup, nicehash.
Nicehash is pure aids, I'm glad we're making this move. It was awesome when they got hacked, pitty they didn't close down for good.
June 07, 2018, 03:02:35 AM
Masari has developed CN-Fast and will roll it out as the PoW algo @ block height 204,000. Testing shows a hashrate increase of 30-50% for both CPU & GPU against CNv7.
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
What is the problem of CNv7? If you want larger hashrate number, why don't choose SHA256 as POW algorithm same as Bitcoin?
What lmao? Your comment makes no sense. The hash increase is all relative. We're forking to prevent 51% attacks and timestamp manipulation. Our network is relatively small in comparison to XMR or ETN. People have been attacking MSR with large nicehash orders (CN7 orders). This fork will move us away from CN7 and kick nicehashers out.
Excellent move. We will see a much more stable network post fork.
So, the reason from CNv7 to CNfast is to kick nicehashers out by using a less common POW algorithm?
June 07, 2018, 01:08:10 AM
Masari has developed CN-Fast and will roll it out as the PoW algo @ block height 204,000. Testing shows a hashrate increase of 30-50% for both CPU & GPU against CNv7.
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
What is the problem of CNv7? If you want larger hashrate number, why don't choose SHA256 as POW algorithm same as Bitcoin?
What lmao? Your comment makes no sense. The hash increase is all relative. We're forking to prevent 51% attacks and timestamp manipulation. Our network is relatively small in comparison to XMR or ETN. People have been attacking MSR with large nicehash orders (CN7 orders). This fork will move us away from CN7 and kick nicehashers out.
Excellent move. We will see a much more stable network post fork.
June 07, 2018, 12:47:07 AM
Masari has developed CN-Fast and will roll it out as the PoW algo @ block height 204,000. Testing shows a hashrate increase of 30-50% for both CPU & GPU against CNv7.
Sadly after this change we will loose ability to use free Claymore version. I hope that Masari devs will release custom xmr-stack without built in fees.
Or you can compile XMR stak via github and remove the fee yourself. It's not rocket science.
June 07, 2018, 12:43:50 AM
Masari has developed CN-Fast and will roll it out as the PoW algo @ block height 204,000. Testing shows a hashrate increase of 30-50% for both CPU & GPU against CNv7.
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
What is the problem of CNv7? If you want larger hashrate number, why don't choose SHA256 as POW algorithm same as Bitcoin?
June 06, 2018, 02:35:59 PM
Masari has developed CN-Fast and will roll it out as the PoW algo @ block height 204,000. Testing shows a hashrate increase of 30-50% for both CPU & GPU against CNv7.
Sadly after this change we will loose ability to use free Claymore version. I hope that Masari devs will release custom xmr-stack without built in fees.
June 06, 2018, 01:19:57 PM
Masari has developed CN-Fast and will roll it out as the PoW algo @ block height 204,000. Testing shows a hashrate increase of 30-50% for both CPU & GPU against CNv7.
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f
June 06, 2018, 12:13:15 PM
June 06, 2018, 10:19:20 AM
Is this the original cryptonight algo? That is ASIC mineable now?
Nope.
June 05, 2018, 05:38:58 PM
I just updated the GUI Windows wallet to 0.2.4. I had to restore the wallet from the seed and after that it was smooth sailing. Syncing and rescanning took only a couple of minutes, all my balance is back, and the GUI looks and "feels" very nice.
Awesome work!
Awesome work!
Well, seems like I spoke too soon. After closing the wallet, the GUI cannot open it again, only giving the following error:
Code:
Couldn't open wallet: basic_string::_M_replace_aux
.I also realized, that the GUI wallet asked for a folder to place the wallet file in, but it didn't write anything to that folder. Restoring from seed works of course, but it would be tedious to always do that again...
Edit: found the solution myself, although it's really weird. Apparently you musn't change the default folder for the wallet storage when asked. So after letting the GUI create the wallet file in "my documents", I closed it, moved the created file to another folder, opened the GUI again and then opened the created wallet file from the other folder. Now it works.
Also: is there a setting to lower the "countdown" to the daemon start? Dunno what those 10 seconds are for...
June 05, 2018, 04:38:30 PM
http://
If you rename your keys file (i.e. wallet-name.keys), it will solve the problem. This is because you have to clear your wallet cache (which would be wallet-name, no extension). A rename of the keys file instead of deleting the cache is the safest option (in case you accidentally delete your private key)
Can you explain a bit more? I have not been able to open my wallet since migrating to Badger. The cli wallet program generates these error messages:
2018-06-05 07:21:51.044 460 WARN wallet.wallet2 src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:3789 Failed to open portable binary, trying unportable
2018-06-05 07:21:51.053 460 WARN wallet.wallet2 src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:3810 Failed to open portable binary, trying unportable
2018-06-05 07:21:51.060 460 ERROR msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Error: failed to load wallet: std::bad_alloc
2018-06-05 07:21:51.061 460 ERROR wallet.simplewallet src/simplewallet/simplewallet.cpp:3048 failed to open account
2018-06-05 07:21:51.061 460 ERROR wallet.simplewallet src/simplewallet/simplewallet.cpp:7292 Failed to initialize wallet
How do I solve this? What do you mean you "have to clear your wallet cache"? I have my old wallet, old wallet password, seed words, etc. Just want to restore and see my balance again.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/452150945296416799/453673443431415838/unknown.png
Rename the file in red brackets.
I had the problem that the v0.2.0.2 masari-wallet-cli would simply not recognize the wallet files from v0.1.4.0 as if there is no backward compatibility.
You input the wallet password and get some error: "Error: failed to load wallet: std::bad_alloc"
So I used --restore-deterministic-wallet and entered the seed from the old wallet, but... attention... it will then ask you for something like a seed encryption pasphrase. If you enter one, it will generate a completely new seed with a new address, i.e. a new wallter, not your old wallet. I don't remember if this seed encryption passphrase was there in previous versions, well at least I didn't use it. So I had to restore again, this time leaving that seed encryption passphrase blank and so it finally restored my old address, i.e. exactly my old wallet.
That's on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Not tried the Windows or MacOS version.
You input the wallet password and get some error: "Error: failed to load wallet: std::bad_alloc"
So I used --restore-deterministic-wallet and entered the seed from the old wallet, but... attention... it will then ask you for something like a seed encryption pasphrase. If you enter one, it will generate a completely new seed with a new address, i.e. a new wallter, not your old wallet. I don't remember if this seed encryption passphrase was there in previous versions, well at least I didn't use it. So I had to restore again, this time leaving that seed encryption passphrase blank and so it finally restored my old address, i.e. exactly my old wallet.
That's on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Not tried the Windows or MacOS version.
If you rename your keys file (i.e. wallet-name.keys), it will solve the problem. This is because you have to clear your wallet cache (which would be wallet-name, no extension). A rename of the keys file instead of deleting the cache is the safest option (in case you accidentally delete your private key)
Can you explain a bit more? I have not been able to open my wallet since migrating to Badger. The cli wallet program generates these error messages:
2018-06-05 07:21:51.044 460 WARN wallet.wallet2 src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:3789 Failed to open portable binary, trying unportable
2018-06-05 07:21:51.053 460 WARN wallet.wallet2 src/wallet/wallet2.cpp:3810 Failed to open portable binary, trying unportable
2018-06-05 07:21:51.060 460 ERROR msgwriter src/common/scoped_message_writer.h:102 Error: failed to load wallet: std::bad_alloc
2018-06-05 07:21:51.061 460 ERROR wallet.simplewallet src/simplewallet/simplewallet.cpp:3048 failed to open account
2018-06-05 07:21:51.061 460 ERROR wallet.simplewallet src/simplewallet/simplewallet.cpp:7292 Failed to initialize wallet
How do I solve this? What do you mean you "have to clear your wallet cache"? I have my old wallet, old wallet password, seed words, etc. Just want to restore and see my balance again.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/452150945296416799/453673443431415838/unknown.png
Rename the file in red brackets.
June 05, 2018, 01:40:19 PM
Is this the original cryptonight algo? That is ASIC mineable now?
June 05, 2018, 01:38:36 PM
I just updated the GUI Windows wallet to 0.2.4. I had to restore the wallet from the seed and after that it was smooth sailing. Syncing and rescanning took only a couple of minutes, all my balance is back, and the GUI looks and "feels" very nice.
Awesome work!
Awesome work!
Jump to: