Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [PRE-ICO LIVE] 🔶 Exxor - Next Generation IOT 🔶 - page 2. (Read 4994 times)

full member
Activity: 742
Merit: 102
I see, your proof is solid.

 but you could figure it out what this Katrina said was BS.

First they would give you max 7.5 BTC ... really? more than 35 000 usd for some ann thread? You think it's normal to pay you this and you believed?

Than you say in your screenshot she promised you 4.5 BTC.... seriously? Almost 25000 usd again for 2 days of work. Didn't you think yourself, they are bullshitting? Or is it you talking BS?

Anyway I'm starting to doubt this project also after your proof. So I'm going to wait and see what they will do.

Meanwhile people should hold their investments until we get more info.
I didn't manage campaigns before. 7.5 was their  typo. They offered 15% of raised funds with a maximum of 30 BTC (= 4.5 BTC). Though not in that amount I have been earning incidently great pays with translations also. Of course I did think to myself that the pay was crazy, but in a crazy scene like this where millions are slammed around anything seems possible.

At the same time, if you are now only "starting to doubt" I wonder if you have really figured out their "BS" yet.
sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 250
What are the main differences of Exxor compared to IOTA?

Is the used encryption in your product proprietary or do you use default and already tested hashing algorithms?
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
Proof can be found in post 3 of this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-exxor-aiming-to-scam-between-2-and-239-million-2274283

If still people want to invest it is their responsibility. I took mine to warn them.

I see, your proof is solid.

 but you could figure it out what this Katrina said was BS.

First they would give you max 7.5 BTC ... really? more than 35 000 usd for some ann thread? You think it's normal to pay you this and you believed?

Than you say in your screenshot she promised you 4.5 BTC.... seriously? Almost 25000 usd again for 2 days of work. Didn't you think yourself, they are bullshitting? Or is it you talking BS?

Anyway I'm starting to doubt this project also after your proof. So I'm going to wait and see what they will do.

Meanwhile people should hold their investments until we get more info.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
Proof can be found in post 3 of this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-exxor-aiming-to-scam-between-2-and-239-million-2274283

If still people want to invest it is their responsibility. I took mine to warn them.

This isnt good, I'm also waiting a response from the team
I will update
full member
Activity: 742
Merit: 102
Proof can be found in post 3 of this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-exxor-aiming-to-scam-between-2-and-239-million-2274283

If still people want to invest it is their responsibility. I took mine to warn them.
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
SCAM ALERT

Unfortunately I have to maintain my warning.

Two days ago I visited the Exxor.org website and was on their chat greeted by Katherine Kaplan, Software Engineer. I asked her about a possible bounty campaign as I was looking for translation work. She invited me to do their bounty campaign. As I was offered 15% of collected bounties, with a bounty max of 30 BTC, I happily agreed. We had contact through her Skype account Skillez, of which she indicated it belonged to her. She wanted a Facebook campaign and Slack campaign included. I pointed out that for this they needed to open their closed Facebook and Slack groups, but I found no answer, nor open groups. Up until now these groups are still closed. She was in a hurry so I worked through the evening, and the evening after, to setup all graphics, content and sheets. The bounty campaign had to be launched today in the afternoon. So yesterday evening I sent her the concept forum code. And in the morning, noon and afternoon I waited for Katherine, now known as Skillez, to come online. Which didn't happen. Only in the afternoon she gave me out of an offline status a short 'hello'. Nothing else. No addressing of Facebook and Slack issues, no consent for afternoon launch, nothing. So I asked what her plan was. She then replied that they were running another project for which my bounty sheets could be used. It would be launched this evening. So asked about this other project and why the plans suddenly had changed. Now Skillez replied that he / she wasn't Katherine of the Exxor project but an agent of an agency doing ICO promotion. I gave them my Bitcoin wallet adress and replied that I wanted to be paid for the work done and / or a sound explanation about the sudden turns (no Exxor bounty launch but another project bounty launch and Exxor Katherine suddenly is a hired PR agent). I just read their reply that they could send 0.02 BTC if I would do the other project. I declined. I want to work in an honest and transparent way and I would not like to cooperate with scams, not even for many Bitcoins. For now I am scammed with work. I had an agreement with Exxor and after delivering fine work they terminated the agreement onesided without sending any payment.

All of the above I can prove with screenshots.

Investors; make your own choice whether this project can be trusted.

Provide solid proof please.. You said you were on their chat two days ago. What chat exactly? Telegram?
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Patience is the key to success
SCAM ALERT

Unfortunately I have to maintain my warning.

Two days ago I visited the Exxor.org website and was on their chat greeted by Katherine Kaplan, Software Engineer. I asked her about a possible bounty campaign as I was looking for translation work. She invited me to do their bounty campaign. As I was offered 15% of collected bounties, with a bounty max of 30 BTC, I happily agreed. We had contact through her Skype account Skillez, of which she indicated it belonged to her. She wanted a Facebook campaign and Slack campaign included. I pointed out that for this they needed to open their closed Facebook and Slack groups, but I found no answer, nor open groups. Up until now these groups are still closed. She was in a hurry so I worked through the evening, and the evening after, to setup all graphics, content and sheets. The bounty campaign had to be launched today in the afternoon. So yesterday evening I sent her the concept forum code. And in the morning, noon and afternoon I waited for Katherine, now known as Skillez, to come online. Which didn't happen. Only in the afternoon she gave me out of an offline status a short 'hello'. Nothing else. No addressing of Facebook and Slack issues, no consent for afternoon launch, nothing. So I asked what her plan was. She then replied that they were running another project for which my bounty sheets could be used. It would be launched this evening. So asked about this other project and why the plans suddenly had changed. Now Skillez replied that he / she wasn't Katherine of the Exxor project but an agent of an agency doing ICO promotion. I gave them my Bitcoin wallet adress and replied that I wanted to be paid for the work done and / or a sound explanation about the sudden turns (no Exxor bounty launch but another project bounty launch and Exxor Katherine suddenly is a hired PR agent). I just read their reply that they could send 0.02 BTC if I would do the other project. I declined. I want to work in an honest and transparent way and I would not like to cooperate with scams, not even for many Bitcoins. For now I am scammed with work. I had an agreement with Exxor and after delivering fine work they terminated the agreement onesided without sending any payment.

All of the above I can prove with screenshots.

Investors; make your own choice whether this project can be trusted.

Thanks for the heads up buddy
full member
Activity: 742
Merit: 102
SCAM ALERT

Unfortunately I have to maintain my warning.

Two days ago I visited the Exxor.org website and was on their chat greeted by Katherine Kaplan, Software Engineer. I asked her about a possible bounty campaign as I was looking for translation work. She invited me to do their bounty campaign. As I was offered 15% of collected bounties, with a bounty max of 30 BTC, I happily agreed. We had contact through her Skype account Skillez, of which she indicated it belonged to her. She wanted a Facebook campaign and Slack campaign included. I pointed out that for this they needed to open their closed Facebook and Slack groups, but I found no answer, nor open groups. Up until now these groups are still closed. She was in a hurry so I worked through the evening, and the evening after, to setup all graphics, content and sheets. The bounty campaign had to be launched today in the afternoon. So yesterday evening I sent her the concept forum code. And in the morning, noon and afternoon I waited for Katherine, now known as Skillez, to come online. Which didn't happen. Only in the afternoon she gave me out of an offline status a short 'hello'. Nothing else. No addressing of Facebook and Slack issues, no consent for afternoon launch, nothing. So I asked what her plan was. She then replied that they were running another project for which my bounty sheets could be used. It would be launched this evening. So asked about this other project and why the plans suddenly had changed. Now Skillez replied that he / she wasn't Katherine of the Exxor project but an agent of an agency doing ICO promotion. I gave them my Bitcoin wallet adress and replied that I wanted to be paid for the work done and / or a sound explanation about the sudden turns (no Exxor bounty launch but another project bounty launch and Exxor Katherine suddenly is a hired PR agent). I just read their reply that they could send 0.02 BTC if I would do the other project. I declined. I want to work in an honest and transparent way and I would not like to cooperate with scams, not even for many Bitcoins. For now I am scammed with work. I had an agreement with Exxor and after delivering fine work they terminated the agreement onesided without sending any payment.

All of the above I can prove with screenshots.

Investors; make your own choice whether this project can be trusted.
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
Earn with impressio.io
Will the project only be developed if it reaches the hard cap? because in the description of ANN you are only mentioning the value of the hard cap, and what would be the soft cap?

Soft cap is 10m USD. Smiley

Join the telegram chat if you have more questions. They answer quick https://t.me/exxor_org

Ok, I will ask you something on Monday. Smiley Chatting in telegram is rather faster than on forum
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
The global "bubble" of IoT will only continue to inflate, it is still just an instrument to increase the limits of its strength. But if on this background understandable finances provided by non-virtual commodity and intellectual assets will begin to form, we will also see that the world and history will eventually choose.

I hope u are not the person who thinks that btc is also a bubble..

And IoT is primitively a thing that is allowed to touch. So there are already "non-virtual commodity and intellectual assets"
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
The global "bubble" of IoT will only continue to inflate, it is still just an instrument to increase the limits of its strength. But if on this background understandable finances provided by non-virtual commodity and intellectual assets will begin to form, we will also see that the world and history will eventually choose.

I hope u are not the person who thinks that btc is also a bubble..
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
Earn with impressio.io
The global "bubble" of IoT will only continue to inflate, it is still just an instrument to increase the limits of its strength. But if on this background understandable finances provided by non-virtual commodity and intellectual assets will begin to form, we will also see that the world and history will eventually choose.
full member
Activity: 742
Merit: 102
SCAM ALERT!

Investors please hold your investment money!

An update will follow this evening CET where I will withdraw or maintain my warning.

Either way I will give more information about my contact with the team then.
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
IOTA is BOCH and V.W. and Exxor IBM and Samsung (not confirmed at all at this point)

Samsung is big..

..and once again, Samsung wrotes today that they have no bearing with Exxor.
https://steemit.com/exxor/@blockrush/meet-exxor-the-14-trillion-iot-samsung-framed-ico-scam

As mentioned previously and in our press releases, the agreement with Samsung hasn't been completed yet. The deal will go through if we are able secure the funding ourselves which is required to start the development, this was the condition we agreed on with Samsung. We have already sold a fair share of all EXX tokens in the first pre-ico days, so things are looking great and we should be able to raise required funds.

We will not comment on such accusations, as they are completely groundless and come from people who are afraid we may pose danger to IOTA and its price. We will continue working hard to complete objectives in our roadmap and reach that 13B USD IOT market in 2020.

What is the minimum funding you need to make the Samsung partnership official and what sources do you guys have?
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
Will the project only be developed if it reaches the hard cap? because in the description of ANN you are only mentioning the value of the hard cap, and what would be the soft cap?

Soft cap is 10m USD. Smiley

Join the telegram chat if you have more questions. They answer quick https://t.me/exxor_org
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
IOTA is BOCH and V.W. and Exxor IBM and Samsung (not confirmed at all at this point)

Samsung is big..

..and once again, Samsung wrotes today that they have no bearing with Exxor.
https://steemit.com/exxor/@blockrush/meet-exxor-the-14-trillion-iot-samsung-framed-ico-scam

As mentioned previously and in our press releases, the agreement with Samsung hasn't been completed yet. The deal will go through if we are able secure the funding ourselves which is required to start the development, this was the condition we agreed on with Samsung. We have already sold a fair share of all EXX tokens in the first pre-ico days, so things are looking great and we should be able to raise required funds.

We will not comment on such accusations, as they are completely groundless and come from people who are afraid we may pose danger to IOTA and its price. We will continue working hard to complete objectives in our roadmap and reach that 13B USD IOT market in 2020.
sr. member
Activity: 642
Merit: 292
IOTA is BOCH and V.W. and Exxor IBM and Samsung (not confirmed at all at this point)

Samsung is big..

..and once again, Samsung wrotes today that they have no bearing with Exxor.
https://steemit.com/exxor/@blockrush/meet-exxor-the-14-trillion-iot-samsung-framed-ico-scam
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 252
Will the project only be developed if it reaches the hard cap? because in the description of ANN you are only mentioning the value of the hard cap, and what would be the soft cap?
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
Hey guys, who are online. The project looks like IOTA. And I was interested in IOTA ICO. So I have something to say. I heard that IOTA is, in fact, centralised and the transactions are not protected.

Haven't heard anything about this. Could you tell us more?

Oh, I can't remember in fact details of this analyse. There was a lot of scary tech words.. Let me find the article..

Here it is. MIT (MIT Digital Currency Initiative) has published an IOTA code audit, providing one of the largest reports on bugs in the history of Crypto-Currency. This report demonstrated the vulnerability in the core of the cryptographic library IOTA, which allowed to destroy coins of any user of the system or to access them.
The largest bug that appears in the audit was found in the IOTA kernel hash partition.

Hold your horses dude, the bugs were fixed after they were found. That's also what developing is about, constantly looking for weak spots and fix them. Furthermore IOTA had a sort of protection mechanism in their source code, so people could not copy their system without license. That's perfectly fine.

Ether devs are fudding because they couldn't see the huge market capital IOTA was about to gain. IOTA is here and will stay guys. If you like it or not.

Taking cheap shots by some devs by posting about this even after IOTA fixed the bugs and admitted that they have a protection mechanism in their source code. Is low life shit.
And what about Exxor? Is it still worth or just little brother of the IOTA and IBM system? The comparison table looks very promising

Well Exxor, according to them self, isn't as big as IOTA. So you can call it s little brother until they start to develop.

Speaking about partnerships:

IOTA is BOCH and V.W. and Exxor IBM and Samsung (not confirmed at all at this point)

Samsung is big..If they really start a partnership Exxor can get pretty big.. IBM and Samsung parsnip will attract other big players.

Anyway guys join the telegram chat to discuss this, I'm already there. -->> @exxor_org

People joined the announcement channel, where you can't chat lol.. The right one is this one @exxor_org
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
Earn with impressio.io
The level of excitement around the "Internet of Things" (IoT), all these "network heaters", causes some confusion. It seemed, would be, so what? Why such rates and budgets? Let me remind you that only IBM, not the first player in this sector, is ready to invest only $ 3 billion in its IoT-platform (software only) why?
I like statistics and forecasts Smiley
"Gartner analysts presented the results of the Maverick research at the Gartner Symposium / ITxpo conference on October 6, 2015. David Furlonger, vice president and partner in the company, recognizes the need for radical changes, while emphasizing that the critical component that IoT needs is, is a system of money circulation between things.

Furlonger also predicts that the success of IoT can be achieved only through the development of a new economic platform and monetary management. Thus, things, having become objects of trade, will redefine the economic stock. "
Pages:
Jump to: